Cargando…

Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™

PURPOSE: The annual quality assurance (QA) of Leksell Gamma Knife(®) (LGK) systems are typically performed using films. Film is a good candidate for small field dosimetry due to its high spatial resolution and availability. However, there are multiple challenges with using film; film does not provid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maraghechi, Borna, Kim, Taeho, Mitchell, Timothy J., Goddu, S. Murty, Dise, Joe, Kavanaugh, James A., Zoberi, Jacqueline E., Mutic, Sasa, Knutson, Nels C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33300664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13070
_version_ 1783646263350132736
author Maraghechi, Borna
Kim, Taeho
Mitchell, Timothy J.
Goddu, S. Murty
Dise, Joe
Kavanaugh, James A.
Zoberi, Jacqueline E.
Mutic, Sasa
Knutson, Nels C.
author_facet Maraghechi, Borna
Kim, Taeho
Mitchell, Timothy J.
Goddu, S. Murty
Dise, Joe
Kavanaugh, James A.
Zoberi, Jacqueline E.
Mutic, Sasa
Knutson, Nels C.
author_sort Maraghechi, Borna
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The annual quality assurance (QA) of Leksell Gamma Knife(®) (LGK) systems are typically performed using films. Film is a good candidate for small field dosimetry due to its high spatial resolution and availability. However, there are multiple challenges with using film; film does not provide real‐time measurement and requires batch‐specific calibration. Our findings show that active detector‐based QA can simplify the procedure and save time without loss of accuracy. METHODS: Annual QA tests for a LGK Icon™ system were performed using both film‐based and filmless techniques. Output calibration, relative output factors (ROF), radiation profiles, sector uniformity/source counting, and verification of the unit center point (UCP) and radiation focal point (RFP) coincidence tests were performed. Radiochromic films, two ionization chambers, and a synthetic diamond detector were used for the measurements. Results were compared and verified with the treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS: The measured dose rate of the LGK Icon was within 0.4% of the TPS value set at the time of commissioning using an ionization chamber. ROF for the 8 and 4‐mm collimators were found to be 0.3% and 1.8% different from TPS values using the MicroDiamond detector and 2.6% and 1.9% different for film, respectively. Excellent agreement was found between TPS and measured dose profiles using the MicroDiamond detector which was within 1%/1 mm vs 2%/1 mm for film. Sector uniformity was found to be within 1% for all eight sectors measured using an ionization chamber. Verification of UCP and RFP coincidence using the MicroDiamond detector and pinprick film test was within 0.3 mm at isocenter for both. CONCLUSION: The annual QA of a LGK Icon was successfully performed by employing filmless techniques. Comparable results were obtained using radiochromic films. Utilizing active detectors instead of films simplifies the QA process and saves time without loss of accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7856498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78564982021-02-05 Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ Maraghechi, Borna Kim, Taeho Mitchell, Timothy J. Goddu, S. Murty Dise, Joe Kavanaugh, James A. Zoberi, Jacqueline E. Mutic, Sasa Knutson, Nels C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The annual quality assurance (QA) of Leksell Gamma Knife(®) (LGK) systems are typically performed using films. Film is a good candidate for small field dosimetry due to its high spatial resolution and availability. However, there are multiple challenges with using film; film does not provide real‐time measurement and requires batch‐specific calibration. Our findings show that active detector‐based QA can simplify the procedure and save time without loss of accuracy. METHODS: Annual QA tests for a LGK Icon™ system were performed using both film‐based and filmless techniques. Output calibration, relative output factors (ROF), radiation profiles, sector uniformity/source counting, and verification of the unit center point (UCP) and radiation focal point (RFP) coincidence tests were performed. Radiochromic films, two ionization chambers, and a synthetic diamond detector were used for the measurements. Results were compared and verified with the treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS: The measured dose rate of the LGK Icon was within 0.4% of the TPS value set at the time of commissioning using an ionization chamber. ROF for the 8 and 4‐mm collimators were found to be 0.3% and 1.8% different from TPS values using the MicroDiamond detector and 2.6% and 1.9% different for film, respectively. Excellent agreement was found between TPS and measured dose profiles using the MicroDiamond detector which was within 1%/1 mm vs 2%/1 mm for film. Sector uniformity was found to be within 1% for all eight sectors measured using an ionization chamber. Verification of UCP and RFP coincidence using the MicroDiamond detector and pinprick film test was within 0.3 mm at isocenter for both. CONCLUSION: The annual QA of a LGK Icon was successfully performed by employing filmless techniques. Comparable results were obtained using radiochromic films. Utilizing active detectors instead of films simplifies the QA process and saves time without loss of accuracy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7856498/ /pubmed/33300664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13070 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Maraghechi, Borna
Kim, Taeho
Mitchell, Timothy J.
Goddu, S. Murty
Dise, Joe
Kavanaugh, James A.
Zoberi, Jacqueline E.
Mutic, Sasa
Knutson, Nels C.
Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™
title Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™
title_full Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™
title_fullStr Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™
title_full_unstemmed Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™
title_short Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™
title_sort filmless quality assurance of a leksell gamma knife® icon™
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33300664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13070
work_keys_str_mv AT maraghechiborna filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon
AT kimtaeho filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon
AT mitchelltimothyj filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon
AT goddusmurty filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon
AT disejoe filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon
AT kavanaughjamesa filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon
AT zoberijacquelinee filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon
AT muticsasa filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon
AT knutsonnelsc filmlessqualityassuranceofaleksellgammaknifeicon