Cargando…

Cleaning the dose falloff in lung SBRT plan

PURPOSE: To investigate a planning technique that can possibly reduce low‐to‐intermediate dose spillage (measured by R50%, D2cm values) in lung SBRT plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose falloff outside the target was studied retrospectively in 102 SBRT VMAT plans of lung tumor. Plans having R50% and/o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desai, Dharmin, Narayanasamy, Ganesh, Bimali, Milan, Cordrey, Ivan, Elasmar, Hisham, Srinivasan, Senthamizhchelvan, Johnson, Ellis Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13113
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To investigate a planning technique that can possibly reduce low‐to‐intermediate dose spillage (measured by R50%, D2cm values) in lung SBRT plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose falloff outside the target was studied retrospectively in 102 SBRT VMAT plans of lung tumor. Plans having R50% and/or D2cm higher than recommended tolerances in RTOG protocols 0813 and 0915 were replanned with new optimization constraints using novel shell structures and novel constraints. Violations in the RTOG R50% value can be rectified with a dose constraint to a novel shell structure (“OptiForR50”). The construction of structure OptiForR50% and the novel optimization criteria translate the RTOG goals for R50% into direct inputs for the optimizer. Violations in the D2cm can be rectified using constraints on a 0.5 cm thick shell structure with inner surface 2cm from the PTV surface. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to compare differences in dose conformity, volume of hot spots, R50%, D2cm of the target in addition to the OAR doses. A two‐sided P‐value of 0.05 was used to assess statistical significance. RESULTS: Among 102 lung SBRT plans with PTV sizes ranging from 5 to 179 cc, 32 plans with violations in R50% or D2cm were reoptimized. The mean reduction in R50% (4.68 vs 3.89) and D2cm (56.49 vs 52.51) was statistically significant both having P < 0.01. Target conformity index, volume of 105% isodose contour outside PTV, normal lung V20, and mean dose to heart and aorta were significantly lowered with P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: The novel planning methodology using multiple shells including the novel OptiForR50 shell with precisely calculated dimensions and optimizer constraints lead to significantly lower values of R50% and D2cm and lower dose spillage in lung SBRT plans. All plans were successfully brought into the zone of no RTOG violations.