Cargando…

Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment

PURPOSE: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and respiratory gating (RG) are widely used to reduce movement of target and healthy organs caused by breathing during irradiation. We hypothesized that accuracy and efficiency comparable to DIBH can be achieved with RG for pancreas treatment. METHODS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Chuan, Li, Xiang, Lu, Wei, Reyngold, Marsha, Gewanter, Richard M., Cuaron, John J., Yorke, Ellen, Li, Tianfang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33378792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13137
_version_ 1783646267531853824
author Zeng, Chuan
Li, Xiang
Lu, Wei
Reyngold, Marsha
Gewanter, Richard M.
Cuaron, John J.
Yorke, Ellen
Li, Tianfang
author_facet Zeng, Chuan
Li, Xiang
Lu, Wei
Reyngold, Marsha
Gewanter, Richard M.
Cuaron, John J.
Yorke, Ellen
Li, Tianfang
author_sort Zeng, Chuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and respiratory gating (RG) are widely used to reduce movement of target and healthy organs caused by breathing during irradiation. We hypothesized that accuracy and efficiency comparable to DIBH can be achieved with RG for pancreas treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer treated with DIBH (eight) or RG (twelve) volumetric modulated arc therapy during 2017–2019 were included in this study, with radiopaque markers implanted near or in the targets. Seventeen patients received 25 fractions, while the other three received 15 fractions. Only patients who could not tolerate DIBH received RG treatment. While both techniques relied on respiratory signals from external markers, internal target motions were monitored with kV X‐ray imaging during treatment. A 3‐mm external gating window was used for DIBH treatment; RG treatment was centered on end‐expiration with a duty cycle of 40%, corresponding to an external gating window of 2–3 mm. During dose delivery, kV images were automatically taken every 20(◦) or 40(◦) gantry rotation, from which internal markers were identified. The marker displacement from their initial positions and the residual motion amplitudes were calculated. For the analysis of treatment efficiency, the treatment time of every session was calculated from the motion management waveform files recorded at the treatment console. RESULTS: Within one fraction, the displacement was 0–5 mm for DIBH and 0–6 mm for RG. The average magnitude of displacement for each patient during the entire course of treatment ranged 0–3 mm for both techniques. No statistically significant difference in displacement or residual motion was observed between the two techniques. The average treatment time was 15 min for DIBH and 17 min for RG, with no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and efficiency were comparable between RG and DIBH treatment for pancreas irradiation. RG is a feasible alternative strategy to DIBH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7856516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78565162021-02-05 Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment Zeng, Chuan Li, Xiang Lu, Wei Reyngold, Marsha Gewanter, Richard M. Cuaron, John J. Yorke, Ellen Li, Tianfang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and respiratory gating (RG) are widely used to reduce movement of target and healthy organs caused by breathing during irradiation. We hypothesized that accuracy and efficiency comparable to DIBH can be achieved with RG for pancreas treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer treated with DIBH (eight) or RG (twelve) volumetric modulated arc therapy during 2017–2019 were included in this study, with radiopaque markers implanted near or in the targets. Seventeen patients received 25 fractions, while the other three received 15 fractions. Only patients who could not tolerate DIBH received RG treatment. While both techniques relied on respiratory signals from external markers, internal target motions were monitored with kV X‐ray imaging during treatment. A 3‐mm external gating window was used for DIBH treatment; RG treatment was centered on end‐expiration with a duty cycle of 40%, corresponding to an external gating window of 2–3 mm. During dose delivery, kV images were automatically taken every 20(◦) or 40(◦) gantry rotation, from which internal markers were identified. The marker displacement from their initial positions and the residual motion amplitudes were calculated. For the analysis of treatment efficiency, the treatment time of every session was calculated from the motion management waveform files recorded at the treatment console. RESULTS: Within one fraction, the displacement was 0–5 mm for DIBH and 0–6 mm for RG. The average magnitude of displacement for each patient during the entire course of treatment ranged 0–3 mm for both techniques. No statistically significant difference in displacement or residual motion was observed between the two techniques. The average treatment time was 15 min for DIBH and 17 min for RG, with no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and efficiency were comparable between RG and DIBH treatment for pancreas irradiation. RG is a feasible alternative strategy to DIBH. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7856516/ /pubmed/33378792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13137 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Zeng, Chuan
Li, Xiang
Lu, Wei
Reyngold, Marsha
Gewanter, Richard M.
Cuaron, John J.
Yorke, Ellen
Li, Tianfang
Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment
title Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment
title_full Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment
title_fullStr Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment
title_short Accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment
title_sort accuracy and efficiency of respiratory gating comparable to deep inspiration breath hold for pancreatic cancer treatment
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33378792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13137
work_keys_str_mv AT zengchuan accuracyandefficiencyofrespiratorygatingcomparabletodeepinspirationbreathholdforpancreaticcancertreatment
AT lixiang accuracyandefficiencyofrespiratorygatingcomparabletodeepinspirationbreathholdforpancreaticcancertreatment
AT luwei accuracyandefficiencyofrespiratorygatingcomparabletodeepinspirationbreathholdforpancreaticcancertreatment
AT reyngoldmarsha accuracyandefficiencyofrespiratorygatingcomparabletodeepinspirationbreathholdforpancreaticcancertreatment
AT gewanterrichardm accuracyandefficiencyofrespiratorygatingcomparabletodeepinspirationbreathholdforpancreaticcancertreatment
AT cuaronjohnj accuracyandefficiencyofrespiratorygatingcomparabletodeepinspirationbreathholdforpancreaticcancertreatment
AT yorkeellen accuracyandefficiencyofrespiratorygatingcomparabletodeepinspirationbreathholdforpancreaticcancertreatment
AT litianfang accuracyandefficiencyofrespiratorygatingcomparabletodeepinspirationbreathholdforpancreaticcancertreatment