Cargando…

Feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy (WBRT) using a U‐net‐based deep‐learning model for predicting the multileaf collimator (MLC) shape bypassing the contouring processes. METHODS: A dataset of 55 cases, including 40 training sets, fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Jesang, Goh, Youngmoon, Song, Kye Jin, Kwak, Jungwon, Cho, Byungchul, Kim, Su San, Lee, Sang‐wook, Choi, Eun Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13130
_version_ 1783646268257468416
author Yu, Jesang
Goh, Youngmoon
Song, Kye Jin
Kwak, Jungwon
Cho, Byungchul
Kim, Su San
Lee, Sang‐wook
Choi, Eun Kyung
author_facet Yu, Jesang
Goh, Youngmoon
Song, Kye Jin
Kwak, Jungwon
Cho, Byungchul
Kim, Su San
Lee, Sang‐wook
Choi, Eun Kyung
author_sort Yu, Jesang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy (WBRT) using a U‐net‐based deep‐learning model for predicting the multileaf collimator (MLC) shape bypassing the contouring processes. METHODS: A dataset of 55 cases, including 40 training sets, five validation sets, and 10 test sets, was used to predict the static MLC shape. The digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) reconstructed from planning CT images as an input layer and the MLC shape as an output layer are connected one‐to‐one via the U‐net modeling. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as the loss function in the training and ninefold cross‐validation. Dose‐volume‐histogram (DVH) curves were constructed for assessing the automatic MLC shaping performance. Deep‐learning (DL) and manually optimized (MO) approaches were compared based on the DVH curves and dose distributions. RESULTS: The ninefold cross‐validation ensemble test results were consistent with DSC values of 94.6 ± 0.4 and 94.7 ± 0.9 in training and validation learnings, respectively. The dose coverages of 95% target volume were (98.0 ± 0.7)% and (98.3 ± 0.8)%, and the maximum doses for the lens as critical organ‐at‐risk were 2.9 Gy and 3.9 Gy for DL and MO, respectively. The DL technique shows the consistent results in terms of the DVH parameter except for MLC shaping prediction for dose saving of small organs such as lens. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable with the MO plan result, the WBRT plan quality obtained using the DL approach is clinically acceptable. Moreover, the DL approach enables WBRT auto‐planning without the time‐consuming manual MLC shaping and target contouring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7856520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78565202021-02-05 Feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning Yu, Jesang Goh, Youngmoon Song, Kye Jin Kwak, Jungwon Cho, Byungchul Kim, Su San Lee, Sang‐wook Choi, Eun Kyung J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy (WBRT) using a U‐net‐based deep‐learning model for predicting the multileaf collimator (MLC) shape bypassing the contouring processes. METHODS: A dataset of 55 cases, including 40 training sets, five validation sets, and 10 test sets, was used to predict the static MLC shape. The digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) reconstructed from planning CT images as an input layer and the MLC shape as an output layer are connected one‐to‐one via the U‐net modeling. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as the loss function in the training and ninefold cross‐validation. Dose‐volume‐histogram (DVH) curves were constructed for assessing the automatic MLC shaping performance. Deep‐learning (DL) and manually optimized (MO) approaches were compared based on the DVH curves and dose distributions. RESULTS: The ninefold cross‐validation ensemble test results were consistent with DSC values of 94.6 ± 0.4 and 94.7 ± 0.9 in training and validation learnings, respectively. The dose coverages of 95% target volume were (98.0 ± 0.7)% and (98.3 ± 0.8)%, and the maximum doses for the lens as critical organ‐at‐risk were 2.9 Gy and 3.9 Gy for DL and MO, respectively. The DL technique shows the consistent results in terms of the DVH parameter except for MLC shaping prediction for dose saving of small organs such as lens. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable with the MO plan result, the WBRT plan quality obtained using the DL approach is clinically acceptable. Moreover, the DL approach enables WBRT auto‐planning without the time‐consuming manual MLC shaping and target contouring. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7856520/ /pubmed/33340391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13130 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Yu, Jesang
Goh, Youngmoon
Song, Kye Jin
Kwak, Jungwon
Cho, Byungchul
Kim, Su San
Lee, Sang‐wook
Choi, Eun Kyung
Feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning
title Feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning
title_full Feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning
title_fullStr Feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning
title_short Feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning
title_sort feasibility of automated planning for whole‐brain radiation therapy using deep learning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13130
work_keys_str_mv AT yujesang feasibilityofautomatedplanningforwholebrainradiationtherapyusingdeeplearning
AT gohyoungmoon feasibilityofautomatedplanningforwholebrainradiationtherapyusingdeeplearning
AT songkyejin feasibilityofautomatedplanningforwholebrainradiationtherapyusingdeeplearning
AT kwakjungwon feasibilityofautomatedplanningforwholebrainradiationtherapyusingdeeplearning
AT chobyungchul feasibilityofautomatedplanningforwholebrainradiationtherapyusingdeeplearning
AT kimsusan feasibilityofautomatedplanningforwholebrainradiationtherapyusingdeeplearning
AT leesangwook feasibilityofautomatedplanningforwholebrainradiationtherapyusingdeeplearning
AT choieunkyung feasibilityofautomatedplanningforwholebrainradiationtherapyusingdeeplearning