Cargando…

Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Multicenter Pilot and Feasibility Study (BENEFIT)

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) continues to present clinical challenges. Despite extensive experience with guided bronchoscopy, the diagnostic yield has not improved significantly. Robotic-assisted bronchoscopic platforms have been developed potentially to improve th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Alexander C., Pastis, Nicholas J., Mahajan, Amit K., Khandhar, Sandeep J., Simoff, Michael J., Machuzak, Michael S., Cicenia, Joseph, Gildea, Thomas R., Silvestri, Gerard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American College of Chest Physicians 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2047
_version_ 1783646268953722880
author Chen, Alexander C.
Pastis, Nicholas J.
Mahajan, Amit K.
Khandhar, Sandeep J.
Simoff, Michael J.
Machuzak, Michael S.
Cicenia, Joseph
Gildea, Thomas R.
Silvestri, Gerard A.
author_facet Chen, Alexander C.
Pastis, Nicholas J.
Mahajan, Amit K.
Khandhar, Sandeep J.
Simoff, Michael J.
Machuzak, Michael S.
Cicenia, Joseph
Gildea, Thomas R.
Silvestri, Gerard A.
author_sort Chen, Alexander C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) continues to present clinical challenges. Despite extensive experience with guided bronchoscopy, the diagnostic yield has not improved significantly. Robotic-assisted bronchoscopic platforms have been developed potentially to improve the diagnostic yield for PPL. Presently, limited data exist that evaluate the performance of robotic systems in live human subjects. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted bronchoscopy in patients with PPLs? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter pilot and feasibility study that used a robotic bronchoscopic system with a mother-daughter configuration in patients with PPL 1 to 5 cm in size. The primary end points were successful lesion localization with the use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) imaging and incidence of procedure related adverse events. Robotic bronchoscopy was performed in patients with the use of direct visualization, electromagnetic navigation, and fluoroscopy. After the use of R-EBUS imaging, transbronchial needle aspiration was performed. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) was used on all cases. Transbronchial needle aspiration alone was sufficient when ROSE was diagnostic; when ROSE was not diagnostic, transbronchial biopsy was performed with the use of the robotic platform, followed by conventional guided bronchoscopic approaches at the discretion of the investigator. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled at five centers. One patient withdrew consent, which left 54 patients for data analysis. Median lesion size was 23 mm (interquartile range, 15 to 29 mm). R-EBUS images were available in 53 of 54 cases. Lesion localization was successful in 51 of 53 patients (96.2%). Pneumothorax was reported in two of 54 of the cases (3.7%); tube thoracostomy was required in one of the cases (1.9 %). No additional adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: This is the first, prospective, multicenter study of robotic bronchoscopy in patients with PPLs. Successful lesion localization was achieved in 96.2% of cases, with an adverse event rate comparable with conventional bronchoscopic procedures. Additional large prospective studies are warranted to evaluate procedure characteristics, such as diagnostic yield. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03727425; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7856527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American College of Chest Physicians
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78565272021-02-17 Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Multicenter Pilot and Feasibility Study (BENEFIT) Chen, Alexander C. Pastis, Nicholas J. Mahajan, Amit K. Khandhar, Sandeep J. Simoff, Michael J. Machuzak, Michael S. Cicenia, Joseph Gildea, Thomas R. Silvestri, Gerard A. Chest Thoracic Oncology: Original Research BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) continues to present clinical challenges. Despite extensive experience with guided bronchoscopy, the diagnostic yield has not improved significantly. Robotic-assisted bronchoscopic platforms have been developed potentially to improve the diagnostic yield for PPL. Presently, limited data exist that evaluate the performance of robotic systems in live human subjects. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted bronchoscopy in patients with PPLs? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter pilot and feasibility study that used a robotic bronchoscopic system with a mother-daughter configuration in patients with PPL 1 to 5 cm in size. The primary end points were successful lesion localization with the use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) imaging and incidence of procedure related adverse events. Robotic bronchoscopy was performed in patients with the use of direct visualization, electromagnetic navigation, and fluoroscopy. After the use of R-EBUS imaging, transbronchial needle aspiration was performed. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) was used on all cases. Transbronchial needle aspiration alone was sufficient when ROSE was diagnostic; when ROSE was not diagnostic, transbronchial biopsy was performed with the use of the robotic platform, followed by conventional guided bronchoscopic approaches at the discretion of the investigator. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled at five centers. One patient withdrew consent, which left 54 patients for data analysis. Median lesion size was 23 mm (interquartile range, 15 to 29 mm). R-EBUS images were available in 53 of 54 cases. Lesion localization was successful in 51 of 53 patients (96.2%). Pneumothorax was reported in two of 54 of the cases (3.7%); tube thoracostomy was required in one of the cases (1.9 %). No additional adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: This is the first, prospective, multicenter study of robotic bronchoscopy in patients with PPLs. Successful lesion localization was achieved in 96.2% of cases, with an adverse event rate comparable with conventional bronchoscopic procedures. Additional large prospective studies are warranted to evaluate procedure characteristics, such as diagnostic yield. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03727425; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. American College of Chest Physicians 2021-02 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7856527/ /pubmed/32822675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2047 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Thoracic Oncology: Original Research
Chen, Alexander C.
Pastis, Nicholas J.
Mahajan, Amit K.
Khandhar, Sandeep J.
Simoff, Michael J.
Machuzak, Michael S.
Cicenia, Joseph
Gildea, Thomas R.
Silvestri, Gerard A.
Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Multicenter Pilot and Feasibility Study (BENEFIT)
title Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Multicenter Pilot and Feasibility Study (BENEFIT)
title_full Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Multicenter Pilot and Feasibility Study (BENEFIT)
title_fullStr Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Multicenter Pilot and Feasibility Study (BENEFIT)
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Multicenter Pilot and Feasibility Study (BENEFIT)
title_short Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Multicenter Pilot and Feasibility Study (BENEFIT)
title_sort robotic bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a multicenter pilot and feasibility study (benefit)
topic Thoracic Oncology: Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2047
work_keys_str_mv AT chenalexanderc roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit
AT pastisnicholasj roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit
AT mahajanamitk roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit
AT khandharsandeepj roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit
AT simoffmichaelj roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit
AT machuzakmichaels roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit
AT ciceniajoseph roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit
AT gildeathomasr roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit
AT silvestrigerarda roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionsamulticenterpilotandfeasibilitystudybenefit