Cargando…

Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Horse Sickness

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Depner, Klaus, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, José Luis, Gortázar Schmidt, Christian, Herskin, Mette, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Pasquali, Paolo, Roberts, Helen Clare, Sihvonen, Liisa Helena, Spoolder, Hans, Ståhl, Karl, Velarde, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Winckler, Christoph, De Clercq, Kris, Klement, Eyal, Stegeman, Jan Arend, Gubbins, Simon, Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni, Broglia, Alessandro, Van der Stede, Yves, Zancanaro, Gabriele, Aznar, Inma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552302
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6403
_version_ 1783646274656927744
author Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Klement, Eyal
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Gubbins, Simon
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Broglia, Alessandro
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Aznar, Inma
author_facet Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Klement, Eyal
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Gubbins, Simon
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Broglia, Alessandro
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Aznar, Inma
collection PubMed
description EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for African Horse Sickness (AHS). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum duration of measures in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures were assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, sampling procedures described in the diagnostic manual for AHS were considered efficient for all Equidae considering the high case fatality rate expected. The monitoring period (14 days) was assessed as effective in every scenario, except for those relating to the epidemiological enquiry where the risk manager should consider increasing the monitoring period, based on the awareness of keepers, environmental conditions and the vector abundance in the region. The current protection zone (100 km) comprises more than 95% of the infections from an affected establishment. Both the radius and duration of the zones could be reduced, based on local environmental conditions and the time of year of the first index case. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation relating to AHS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7856565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78565652021-02-05 Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Horse Sickness Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Klement, Eyal Stegeman, Jan Arend Gubbins, Simon Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Broglia, Alessandro Van der Stede, Yves Zancanaro, Gabriele Aznar, Inma EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for African Horse Sickness (AHS). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum duration of measures in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures were assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, sampling procedures described in the diagnostic manual for AHS were considered efficient for all Equidae considering the high case fatality rate expected. The monitoring period (14 days) was assessed as effective in every scenario, except for those relating to the epidemiological enquiry where the risk manager should consider increasing the monitoring period, based on the awareness of keepers, environmental conditions and the vector abundance in the region. The current protection zone (100 km) comprises more than 95% of the infections from an affected establishment. Both the radius and duration of the zones could be reduced, based on local environmental conditions and the time of year of the first index case. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation relating to AHS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7856565/ /pubmed/33552302 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6403 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Klement, Eyal
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Gubbins, Simon
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Broglia, Alessandro
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Aznar, Inma
Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Horse Sickness
title Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Horse Sickness
title_full Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Horse Sickness
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Horse Sickness
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Horse Sickness
title_short Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Horse Sickness
title_sort scientific opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category a diseases of animal health law: african horse sickness
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552302
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6403
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT nielsensørensaxmose scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT alvarezjulio scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT calistripaolo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT depnerklaus scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT drewejulianashley scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT garinbastujibruno scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT gortazarschmidtchristian scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT herskinmette scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT michelvirginie scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT pasqualipaolo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT robertshelenclare scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT sihvonenliisahelena scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT spoolderhans scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT stahlkarl scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT velardeantonio scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT viltroparvo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT wincklerchristoph scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT declercqkris scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT klementeyal scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT stegemanjanarend scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT gubbinssimon scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT antoniousotiriaeleni scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT brogliaalessandro scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT vanderstedeyves scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT zancanarogabriele scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness
AT aznarinma scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanhorsesickness