Cargando…
Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictability and accuracy of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) online calculator with the Haigis-L formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in post myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileuses (LASIK) eyes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33229682 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2494_20 |
_version_ | 1783646346599727104 |
---|---|
author | Menon, P Ramya Shekhar, Madhu Sankarananthan, R Agarwal, Neha Dhanya, CA Wijesinghe, Hiruni K |
author_facet | Menon, P Ramya Shekhar, Madhu Sankarananthan, R Agarwal, Neha Dhanya, CA Wijesinghe, Hiruni K |
author_sort | Menon, P Ramya |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictability and accuracy of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) online calculator with the Haigis-L formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in post myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileuses (LASIK) eyes undergoing cataract surgery and also to analyze the postoperative refractive outcome among the ASCRS average, maximum and minimum values. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on post myopic LASIK eyes which underwent cataract surgery between June 2017 and December 2019. IOL power was calculated using both Haigis-L & ASCRS methods. Implanted IOL power was based on the ASCRS method. The expected postoperative refraction for IOL power based on the Haigis-L formula was calculated and compared with the Spherical Equivalent (SE) obtained from the patient's actual refraction. Prediction error (PE) & Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was calculated. Intragroup analysis of ASCRS values was done. RESULTS: Among the 41 eyes analyzed, pre-operative and post-operative mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.58 ± 0.21 and 0.15 ± 0.26 logMAR, respectively. In the ASCRS method, 36 (87.8%) and 40 (97.6%) eyes had PE within ± 0.5D and ± 1.0 D, respectively, whereas, in the Haigis-L method, 29 (70.7%) eyes, and 38 (92.7%) eyes had PE within ± 0.5D and ± 1.0 D, respectively. Among the ASCRS subgroups, ASCRS average, maximum and minimum values had 83%, 80.6%, and 48.8% eyes with SE within ± 0.5D, respectively. CONCLUSION: ASCRS method can be considered as an equally efficient method of IOL power calculation as the Haigis-L method in eyes which have undergone post myopic LASIK refractive surgery. ASCRS maximum & average values gave better emmetropic results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7856948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78569482021-02-05 Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes Menon, P Ramya Shekhar, Madhu Sankarananthan, R Agarwal, Neha Dhanya, CA Wijesinghe, Hiruni K Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictability and accuracy of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) online calculator with the Haigis-L formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in post myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileuses (LASIK) eyes undergoing cataract surgery and also to analyze the postoperative refractive outcome among the ASCRS average, maximum and minimum values. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on post myopic LASIK eyes which underwent cataract surgery between June 2017 and December 2019. IOL power was calculated using both Haigis-L & ASCRS methods. Implanted IOL power was based on the ASCRS method. The expected postoperative refraction for IOL power based on the Haigis-L formula was calculated and compared with the Spherical Equivalent (SE) obtained from the patient's actual refraction. Prediction error (PE) & Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was calculated. Intragroup analysis of ASCRS values was done. RESULTS: Among the 41 eyes analyzed, pre-operative and post-operative mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.58 ± 0.21 and 0.15 ± 0.26 logMAR, respectively. In the ASCRS method, 36 (87.8%) and 40 (97.6%) eyes had PE within ± 0.5D and ± 1.0 D, respectively, whereas, in the Haigis-L method, 29 (70.7%) eyes, and 38 (92.7%) eyes had PE within ± 0.5D and ± 1.0 D, respectively. Among the ASCRS subgroups, ASCRS average, maximum and minimum values had 83%, 80.6%, and 48.8% eyes with SE within ± 0.5D, respectively. CONCLUSION: ASCRS method can be considered as an equally efficient method of IOL power calculation as the Haigis-L method in eyes which have undergone post myopic LASIK refractive surgery. ASCRS maximum & average values gave better emmetropic results. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-12 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7856948/ /pubmed/33229682 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2494_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Menon, P Ramya Shekhar, Madhu Sankarananthan, R Agarwal, Neha Dhanya, CA Wijesinghe, Hiruni K Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes |
title | Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes |
title_full | Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes |
title_short | Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes |
title_sort | comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of american society of cataract and refractive surgery online calculator with haigis-l formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33229682 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2494_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menonpramya comparativeanalysisofpredictabilityandaccuracyofamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryonlinecalculatorwithhaigislformulainpostmyopiclaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisrefractivesurgeryeyes AT shekharmadhu comparativeanalysisofpredictabilityandaccuracyofamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryonlinecalculatorwithhaigislformulainpostmyopiclaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisrefractivesurgeryeyes AT sankarananthanr comparativeanalysisofpredictabilityandaccuracyofamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryonlinecalculatorwithhaigislformulainpostmyopiclaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisrefractivesurgeryeyes AT agarwalneha comparativeanalysisofpredictabilityandaccuracyofamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryonlinecalculatorwithhaigislformulainpostmyopiclaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisrefractivesurgeryeyes AT dhanyaca comparativeanalysisofpredictabilityandaccuracyofamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryonlinecalculatorwithhaigislformulainpostmyopiclaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisrefractivesurgeryeyes AT wijesinghehirunik comparativeanalysisofpredictabilityandaccuracyofamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgeryonlinecalculatorwithhaigislformulainpostmyopiclaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisrefractivesurgeryeyes |