Cargando…
Biological responses to COVID-19: Insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles
BACKGROUND: Understanding the spectrum and course of biological responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have important therapeutic implications. We sought to characterise biological responses among patients hospitalised with severe COVID-19 based on serial, routinely collected, physiolo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33588321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retram.2021.103276 |
_version_ | 1783646368453099520 |
---|---|
author | Zakeri, Rosita Pickles, Andrew Carr, Ewan Bean, Daniel M. O’Gallagher, Kevin Kraljewic, Zeljko Searle, Tom Shek, Anthony Galloway, James B Teo, James T.H. Shah, Ajay M. Dobson, Richard J.B. Bendayan, Rebecca |
author_facet | Zakeri, Rosita Pickles, Andrew Carr, Ewan Bean, Daniel M. O’Gallagher, Kevin Kraljewic, Zeljko Searle, Tom Shek, Anthony Galloway, James B Teo, James T.H. Shah, Ajay M. Dobson, Richard J.B. Bendayan, Rebecca |
author_sort | Zakeri, Rosita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding the spectrum and course of biological responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have important therapeutic implications. We sought to characterise biological responses among patients hospitalised with severe COVID-19 based on serial, routinely collected, physiological and blood biomarker values. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1335 patients hospitalised with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (median age 70 years, 56 % male), between 1st March and 30th April 2020. Latent profile analysis was performed on serial physiological and blood biomarkers. Patient characteristics, comorbidities and rates of death and admission to intensive care, were compared between the latent classes. A five class solution provided the best fit. Class 1 “Typical response” exhibited a moderately elevated and rising C-reactive protein (CRP), stable lymphopaenia, and the lowest rates of 14-day adverse outcomes. Class 2 “Rapid hyperinflammatory response” comprised older patients, with higher admission white cell and neutrophil counts, which declined over time, accompanied by a very high and rising CRP and platelet count, and exibited the highest mortality risk. Class 3 “Progressive inflammatory response” was similar to the typical response except for a higher and rising CRP, though similar mortality rate. Class 4 “Inflammatory response with kidney injury” had prominent lymphopaenia, moderately elevated (and rising) CRP, and severe renal failure. Class 5 “Hyperinflammatory response with kidney injury” comprised older patients, with a very high and rising CRP, and severe renal failure that attenuated over time. Physiological measures did not substantially vary between classes at baseline or early admission. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our identification of five distinct classes of biomarker profiles provides empirical evidence for heterogeneous biological responses to COVID-19. Early hyperinflammatory responses and kidney injury may signify unique pathophysiology that requires targeted therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7857048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78570482021-02-04 Biological responses to COVID-19: Insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles Zakeri, Rosita Pickles, Andrew Carr, Ewan Bean, Daniel M. O’Gallagher, Kevin Kraljewic, Zeljko Searle, Tom Shek, Anthony Galloway, James B Teo, James T.H. Shah, Ajay M. Dobson, Richard J.B. Bendayan, Rebecca Curr Res Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Understanding the spectrum and course of biological responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have important therapeutic implications. We sought to characterise biological responses among patients hospitalised with severe COVID-19 based on serial, routinely collected, physiological and blood biomarker values. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1335 patients hospitalised with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (median age 70 years, 56 % male), between 1st March and 30th April 2020. Latent profile analysis was performed on serial physiological and blood biomarkers. Patient characteristics, comorbidities and rates of death and admission to intensive care, were compared between the latent classes. A five class solution provided the best fit. Class 1 “Typical response” exhibited a moderately elevated and rising C-reactive protein (CRP), stable lymphopaenia, and the lowest rates of 14-day adverse outcomes. Class 2 “Rapid hyperinflammatory response” comprised older patients, with higher admission white cell and neutrophil counts, which declined over time, accompanied by a very high and rising CRP and platelet count, and exibited the highest mortality risk. Class 3 “Progressive inflammatory response” was similar to the typical response except for a higher and rising CRP, though similar mortality rate. Class 4 “Inflammatory response with kidney injury” had prominent lymphopaenia, moderately elevated (and rising) CRP, and severe renal failure. Class 5 “Hyperinflammatory response with kidney injury” comprised older patients, with a very high and rising CRP, and severe renal failure that attenuated over time. Physiological measures did not substantially vary between classes at baseline or early admission. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our identification of five distinct classes of biomarker profiles provides empirical evidence for heterogeneous biological responses to COVID-19. Early hyperinflammatory responses and kidney injury may signify unique pathophysiology that requires targeted therapy. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. 2021-05 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7857048/ /pubmed/33588321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retram.2021.103276 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zakeri, Rosita Pickles, Andrew Carr, Ewan Bean, Daniel M. O’Gallagher, Kevin Kraljewic, Zeljko Searle, Tom Shek, Anthony Galloway, James B Teo, James T.H. Shah, Ajay M. Dobson, Richard J.B. Bendayan, Rebecca Biological responses to COVID-19: Insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles |
title | Biological responses to COVID-19: Insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles |
title_full | Biological responses to COVID-19: Insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles |
title_fullStr | Biological responses to COVID-19: Insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological responses to COVID-19: Insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles |
title_short | Biological responses to COVID-19: Insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles |
title_sort | biological responses to covid-19: insights from physiological and blood biomarker profiles |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33588321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retram.2021.103276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zakerirosita biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT picklesandrew biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT carrewan biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT beandanielm biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT ogallagherkevin biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT kraljewiczeljko biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT searletom biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT shekanthony biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT gallowayjamesb biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT teojamesth biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT shahajaym biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT dobsonrichardjb biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles AT bendayanrebecca biologicalresponsestocovid19insightsfromphysiologicalandbloodbiomarkerprofiles |