Cargando…

The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components

In species with multiple mating, intense sexual selection may occur both before and after copulation. However, comparing the strength of pre‐ and postcopulatory selection is challenging, because (i) postcopulatory processes are generally difficult to observe and (ii) the often‐used opportunity for s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marie‐Orleach, Lucas, Vellnow, Nikolas, Schärer, Lukas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.210
_version_ 1783646415255240704
author Marie‐Orleach, Lucas
Vellnow, Nikolas
Schärer, Lukas
author_facet Marie‐Orleach, Lucas
Vellnow, Nikolas
Schärer, Lukas
author_sort Marie‐Orleach, Lucas
collection PubMed
description In species with multiple mating, intense sexual selection may occur both before and after copulation. However, comparing the strength of pre‐ and postcopulatory selection is challenging, because (i) postcopulatory processes are generally difficult to observe and (ii) the often‐used opportunity for selection (I) metric contains both deterministic and stochastic components. Here, we quantified pre‐ and postcopulatory male fitness components of the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm, Macrostomum lignano. We did this by tracking fluorescent sperm—using transgenics—through the transparent body of sperm recipients, enabling to observe postcopulatory processes in vivo. Moreover, we sequentially exposed focal worms to three independent mating groups, and in each assessed their mating success, sperm‐transfer efficiency, sperm fertilizing efficiency, and partner fecundity. Based on these multiple measures, we could, for each fitness component, combine the variance (I) with the repeatability (R) in individual success to assess the amount of repeatable variance in individual success—a measure we call the repeatable opportunity for selection (I(R)). We found higher repeatable opportunity for selection in sperm‐transfer efficiency and sperm fertilizing efficiency compared to mating success, which clearly suggests that postcopulatory selection is stronger than precopulatory selection. Our study demonstrates that the opportunity for selection contains a repeatable deterministic component, which can be assessed and disentangled from the often large stochastic component, to provide a better estimate of the strength of selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7857279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78572792021-02-05 The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Vellnow, Nikolas Schärer, Lukas Evol Lett Letters In species with multiple mating, intense sexual selection may occur both before and after copulation. However, comparing the strength of pre‐ and postcopulatory selection is challenging, because (i) postcopulatory processes are generally difficult to observe and (ii) the often‐used opportunity for selection (I) metric contains both deterministic and stochastic components. Here, we quantified pre‐ and postcopulatory male fitness components of the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm, Macrostomum lignano. We did this by tracking fluorescent sperm—using transgenics—through the transparent body of sperm recipients, enabling to observe postcopulatory processes in vivo. Moreover, we sequentially exposed focal worms to three independent mating groups, and in each assessed their mating success, sperm‐transfer efficiency, sperm fertilizing efficiency, and partner fecundity. Based on these multiple measures, we could, for each fitness component, combine the variance (I) with the repeatability (R) in individual success to assess the amount of repeatable variance in individual success—a measure we call the repeatable opportunity for selection (I(R)). We found higher repeatable opportunity for selection in sperm‐transfer efficiency and sperm fertilizing efficiency compared to mating success, which clearly suggests that postcopulatory selection is stronger than precopulatory selection. Our study demonstrates that the opportunity for selection contains a repeatable deterministic component, which can be assessed and disentangled from the often large stochastic component, to provide a better estimate of the strength of selection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7857279/ /pubmed/33552539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.210 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Marie‐Orleach, Lucas
Vellnow, Nikolas
Schärer, Lukas
The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components
title The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components
title_full The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components
title_fullStr The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components
title_full_unstemmed The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components
title_short The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components
title_sort repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.210
work_keys_str_mv AT marieorleachlucas therepeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents
AT vellnownikolas therepeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents
AT scharerlukas therepeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents
AT marieorleachlucas repeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents
AT vellnownikolas repeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents
AT scharerlukas repeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents