Cargando…
The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components
In species with multiple mating, intense sexual selection may occur both before and after copulation. However, comparing the strength of pre‐ and postcopulatory selection is challenging, because (i) postcopulatory processes are generally difficult to observe and (ii) the often‐used opportunity for s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.210 |
_version_ | 1783646415255240704 |
---|---|
author | Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Vellnow, Nikolas Schärer, Lukas |
author_facet | Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Vellnow, Nikolas Schärer, Lukas |
author_sort | Marie‐Orleach, Lucas |
collection | PubMed |
description | In species with multiple mating, intense sexual selection may occur both before and after copulation. However, comparing the strength of pre‐ and postcopulatory selection is challenging, because (i) postcopulatory processes are generally difficult to observe and (ii) the often‐used opportunity for selection (I) metric contains both deterministic and stochastic components. Here, we quantified pre‐ and postcopulatory male fitness components of the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm, Macrostomum lignano. We did this by tracking fluorescent sperm—using transgenics—through the transparent body of sperm recipients, enabling to observe postcopulatory processes in vivo. Moreover, we sequentially exposed focal worms to three independent mating groups, and in each assessed their mating success, sperm‐transfer efficiency, sperm fertilizing efficiency, and partner fecundity. Based on these multiple measures, we could, for each fitness component, combine the variance (I) with the repeatability (R) in individual success to assess the amount of repeatable variance in individual success—a measure we call the repeatable opportunity for selection (I(R)). We found higher repeatable opportunity for selection in sperm‐transfer efficiency and sperm fertilizing efficiency compared to mating success, which clearly suggests that postcopulatory selection is stronger than precopulatory selection. Our study demonstrates that the opportunity for selection contains a repeatable deterministic component, which can be assessed and disentangled from the often large stochastic component, to provide a better estimate of the strength of selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7857279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78572792021-02-05 The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Vellnow, Nikolas Schärer, Lukas Evol Lett Letters In species with multiple mating, intense sexual selection may occur both before and after copulation. However, comparing the strength of pre‐ and postcopulatory selection is challenging, because (i) postcopulatory processes are generally difficult to observe and (ii) the often‐used opportunity for selection (I) metric contains both deterministic and stochastic components. Here, we quantified pre‐ and postcopulatory male fitness components of the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm, Macrostomum lignano. We did this by tracking fluorescent sperm—using transgenics—through the transparent body of sperm recipients, enabling to observe postcopulatory processes in vivo. Moreover, we sequentially exposed focal worms to three independent mating groups, and in each assessed their mating success, sperm‐transfer efficiency, sperm fertilizing efficiency, and partner fecundity. Based on these multiple measures, we could, for each fitness component, combine the variance (I) with the repeatability (R) in individual success to assess the amount of repeatable variance in individual success—a measure we call the repeatable opportunity for selection (I(R)). We found higher repeatable opportunity for selection in sperm‐transfer efficiency and sperm fertilizing efficiency compared to mating success, which clearly suggests that postcopulatory selection is stronger than precopulatory selection. Our study demonstrates that the opportunity for selection contains a repeatable deterministic component, which can be assessed and disentangled from the often large stochastic component, to provide a better estimate of the strength of selection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7857279/ /pubmed/33552539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.210 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Letters Marie‐Orleach, Lucas Vellnow, Nikolas Schärer, Lukas The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components |
title | The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components |
title_full | The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components |
title_fullStr | The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components |
title_full_unstemmed | The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components |
title_short | The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components |
title_sort | repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components |
topic | Letters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marieorleachlucas therepeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents AT vellnownikolas therepeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents AT scharerlukas therepeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents AT marieorleachlucas repeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents AT vellnownikolas repeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents AT scharerlukas repeatableopportunityforselectiondiffersbetweenpreandpostcopulatoryfitnesscomponents |