Cargando…

Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation

Spatially varying selection promotes variance in allele frequencies, increasing genetic differentiation between the demes of a metapopulation. For that reason, outliers in the genome‐wide distribution of summary statistics measuring genetic differentiation, such as F(ST), are often interpreted as ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Booker, Tom R., Yeaman, Sam, Whitlock, Michael C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.208
_version_ 1783646420041990144
author Booker, Tom R.
Yeaman, Sam
Whitlock, Michael C.
author_facet Booker, Tom R.
Yeaman, Sam
Whitlock, Michael C.
author_sort Booker, Tom R.
collection PubMed
description Spatially varying selection promotes variance in allele frequencies, increasing genetic differentiation between the demes of a metapopulation. For that reason, outliers in the genome‐wide distribution of summary statistics measuring genetic differentiation, such as F(ST), are often interpreted as evidence for alleles that contribute to local adaptation. However, theoretical studies have shown that in spatially structured populations the spread of beneficial mutations with spatially uniform fitness effects can also induce transient genetic differentiation. In recent years, numerous empirical studies have suggested that such species‐wide, or global, adaptation makes a substantial contribution to molecular evolution. In this perspective, we discuss how commonly such global adaptation may influence the genome‐wide distribution of F(ST) and generate genetic differentiation patterns, which could be mistaken for local adaptation. To illustrate this, we use forward‐in‐time population genetic simulations assuming parameters for the rate and strength of beneficial mutations consistent with estimates from natural populations. We demonstrate that the spread of globally beneficial mutations in parapatric populations may frequently generate F(ST) outliers, which could be misinterpreted as evidence for local adaptation. The spread of beneficial mutations causes selective sweeps at flanking sites, so in some cases, the effects of global versus local adaptation may be distinguished by examining patterns of nucleotide diversity within and between populations in addition to F(ST). However, when local adaptation has been only recently established, it may be much more difficult to distinguish from global adaptation, due to less accumulation of linkage disequilibrium at flanking sites. Through our discussion, we conclude that a large fraction of F(ST) outliers that are presumed to arise from local adaptation may instead be due to global adaptation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7857299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78572992021-02-05 Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation Booker, Tom R. Yeaman, Sam Whitlock, Michael C. Evol Lett Comments and Opinions Spatially varying selection promotes variance in allele frequencies, increasing genetic differentiation between the demes of a metapopulation. For that reason, outliers in the genome‐wide distribution of summary statistics measuring genetic differentiation, such as F(ST), are often interpreted as evidence for alleles that contribute to local adaptation. However, theoretical studies have shown that in spatially structured populations the spread of beneficial mutations with spatially uniform fitness effects can also induce transient genetic differentiation. In recent years, numerous empirical studies have suggested that such species‐wide, or global, adaptation makes a substantial contribution to molecular evolution. In this perspective, we discuss how commonly such global adaptation may influence the genome‐wide distribution of F(ST) and generate genetic differentiation patterns, which could be mistaken for local adaptation. To illustrate this, we use forward‐in‐time population genetic simulations assuming parameters for the rate and strength of beneficial mutations consistent with estimates from natural populations. We demonstrate that the spread of globally beneficial mutations in parapatric populations may frequently generate F(ST) outliers, which could be misinterpreted as evidence for local adaptation. The spread of beneficial mutations causes selective sweeps at flanking sites, so in some cases, the effects of global versus local adaptation may be distinguished by examining patterns of nucleotide diversity within and between populations in addition to F(ST). However, when local adaptation has been only recently established, it may be much more difficult to distinguish from global adaptation, due to less accumulation of linkage disequilibrium at flanking sites. Through our discussion, we conclude that a large fraction of F(ST) outliers that are presumed to arise from local adaptation may instead be due to global adaptation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7857299/ /pubmed/33552532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.208 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Comments and Opinions
Booker, Tom R.
Yeaman, Sam
Whitlock, Michael C.
Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation
title Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation
title_full Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation
title_fullStr Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation
title_short Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation
title_sort global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation
topic Comments and Opinions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.208
work_keys_str_mv AT bookertomr globaladaptationcomplicatestheinterpretationofgenomescansforlocaladaptation
AT yeamansam globaladaptationcomplicatestheinterpretationofgenomescansforlocaladaptation
AT whitlockmichaelc globaladaptationcomplicatestheinterpretationofgenomescansforlocaladaptation