Cargando…

Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis

The purposes of this study were to develop and evaluate the test-retest reliability of a specific low-cost three-dimensional webcam recording system (3D-WCRS) and compare its reliability to a standard motion analysis system. Twenty healthy volunteers comprised of 5 males and 15 females with a mean a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pusara, Apiwan, Heamawatanachai, Sumet, Sinsurin, Komsak, Jorrakate, Chaiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221
_version_ 1783646421695594496
author Pusara, Apiwan
Heamawatanachai, Sumet
Sinsurin, Komsak
Jorrakate, Chaiyong
author_facet Pusara, Apiwan
Heamawatanachai, Sumet
Sinsurin, Komsak
Jorrakate, Chaiyong
author_sort Pusara, Apiwan
collection PubMed
description The purposes of this study were to develop and evaluate the test-retest reliability of a specific low-cost three-dimensional webcam recording system (3D-WCRS) and compare its reliability to a standard motion analysis system. Twenty healthy volunteers comprised of 5 males and 15 females with a mean age of 22.90 years and mean BMI of 22.72 kg/m(2) were investigated for angles of hip, knee and ankle joints in three planes while walking at a self-selected speed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate as well as compare the test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis system. Standard error of measurement (SEM) was also analyzed for the purposes of the study. The results exhibited excellent test-retest reliability for the 3D-WCRS (ICCs ranged between 0.93 and 0.99, p = 0.001) in the three joints and planes. The standard motion analysis system demonstrated excellent reliability for all joints and planes (ICCs ranged between 0.99 and 1.00, p = 0.001). Minimal SEM values were observed in both the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis systems. Therefore, the developed low-cost 3D-WCRS exhibits good to excellent test-retest reliability. The test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS is likely to be comparable to a standard motion analysis system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7857306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78573062021-06-15 Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis Pusara, Apiwan Heamawatanachai, Sumet Sinsurin, Komsak Jorrakate, Chaiyong Int Biomech Article The purposes of this study were to develop and evaluate the test-retest reliability of a specific low-cost three-dimensional webcam recording system (3D-WCRS) and compare its reliability to a standard motion analysis system. Twenty healthy volunteers comprised of 5 males and 15 females with a mean age of 22.90 years and mean BMI of 22.72 kg/m(2) were investigated for angles of hip, knee and ankle joints in three planes while walking at a self-selected speed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate as well as compare the test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis system. Standard error of measurement (SEM) was also analyzed for the purposes of the study. The results exhibited excellent test-retest reliability for the 3D-WCRS (ICCs ranged between 0.93 and 0.99, p = 0.001) in the three joints and planes. The standard motion analysis system demonstrated excellent reliability for all joints and planes (ICCs ranged between 0.99 and 1.00, p = 0.001). Minimal SEM values were observed in both the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis systems. Therefore, the developed low-cost 3D-WCRS exhibits good to excellent test-retest reliability. The test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS is likely to be comparable to a standard motion analysis system. Taylor & Francis 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7857306/ /pubmed/34042008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Pusara, Apiwan
Heamawatanachai, Sumet
Sinsurin, Komsak
Jorrakate, Chaiyong
Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis
title Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis
title_full Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis
title_fullStr Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis
title_short Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis
title_sort reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221
work_keys_str_mv AT pusaraapiwan reliabilityofalowcostwebcamrecordingsystemforthreedimensionallowerlimbgaitanalysis
AT heamawatanachaisumet reliabilityofalowcostwebcamrecordingsystemforthreedimensionallowerlimbgaitanalysis
AT sinsurinkomsak reliabilityofalowcostwebcamrecordingsystemforthreedimensionallowerlimbgaitanalysis
AT jorrakatechaiyong reliabilityofalowcostwebcamrecordingsystemforthreedimensionallowerlimbgaitanalysis