Cargando…
Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred?
Several numerical approaches have been developed to address the soft tissue artefact, such as the segmental optimization and multibody kinematics optimizations using either open-loop or closed-loop chains. However, it is still not clear which method is the most efficient for scapular kinematics reco...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857462/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1405741 |
_version_ | 1783646448193110016 |
---|---|
author | Michaud, Benjamin Duprey, Sonia Begon, Mickaël |
author_facet | Michaud, Benjamin Duprey, Sonia Begon, Mickaël |
author_sort | Michaud, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several numerical approaches have been developed to address the soft tissue artefact, such as the segmental optimization and multibody kinematics optimizations using either open-loop or closed-loop chains. However, it is still not clear which method is the most efficient for scapular kinematics reconstruction. In this study, six kinematic models were compared to a silver standard, i.e. a scapula palpator, during a series of 55 postures with maximal amplitudes of both the arm and scapula performed by 15 subjects. The most accurate approaches were the multibody optimization with a closed-loop chain and the segmental optimization. They provided averaged scapula misorientations of 14.9 ± 6.7° and 16 ± 7.1, respectively. Regarding the closed-loop chain integrating a point-to-ellipsoid scapulothoracic joint, the ellipsoid providing the most accurate results was a thorax-size ellipsoid fitting the area browsed by the scapula. Eventually, considering the high implementation costs of a multibody kinematics optimization, the segmental optimization could be considered as appropriate for scapular kinematics reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7857462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78574622021-06-15 Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred? Michaud, Benjamin Duprey, Sonia Begon, Mickaël Int Biomech Articles Several numerical approaches have been developed to address the soft tissue artefact, such as the segmental optimization and multibody kinematics optimizations using either open-loop or closed-loop chains. However, it is still not clear which method is the most efficient for scapular kinematics reconstruction. In this study, six kinematic models were compared to a silver standard, i.e. a scapula palpator, during a series of 55 postures with maximal amplitudes of both the arm and scapula performed by 15 subjects. The most accurate approaches were the multibody optimization with a closed-loop chain and the segmental optimization. They provided averaged scapula misorientations of 14.9 ± 6.7° and 16 ± 7.1, respectively. Regarding the closed-loop chain integrating a point-to-ellipsoid scapulothoracic joint, the ellipsoid providing the most accurate results was a thorax-size ellipsoid fitting the area browsed by the scapula. Eventually, considering the high implementation costs of a multibody kinematics optimization, the segmental optimization could be considered as appropriate for scapular kinematics reconstruction. Taylor & Francis 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7857462/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1405741 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Michaud, Benjamin Duprey, Sonia Begon, Mickaël Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred? |
title | Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred? |
title_full | Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred? |
title_fullStr | Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred? |
title_full_unstemmed | Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred? |
title_short | Scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred? |
title_sort | scapular kinematic reconstruction – segmental optimization, multibody optimization with open-loop or closed-loop chains: which one should be preferred? |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857462/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1405741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michaudbenjamin scapularkinematicreconstructionsegmentaloptimizationmultibodyoptimizationwithopenlooporclosedloopchainswhichoneshouldbepreferred AT dupreysonia scapularkinematicreconstructionsegmentaloptimizationmultibodyoptimizationwithopenlooporclosedloopchainswhichoneshouldbepreferred AT begonmickael scapularkinematicreconstructionsegmentaloptimizationmultibodyoptimizationwithopenlooporclosedloopchainswhichoneshouldbepreferred |