Cargando…

An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge

A simple method to quantify the kinematic chain in a propulsive task would facilitate assessment of athlete effectiveness. The study’s aim was to assess if the kinematic chain distinguishes between skill levels. Fencers were separated into two groups based on attacking lunge ability (7 skilled; 8 no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulloy, Francis, Mullineaux, David R., Graham-Smith, Phillip, Irwin, Gareth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857475/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1454342
_version_ 1783646450086838272
author Mulloy, Francis
Mullineaux, David R.
Graham-Smith, Phillip
Irwin, Gareth
author_facet Mulloy, Francis
Mullineaux, David R.
Graham-Smith, Phillip
Irwin, Gareth
author_sort Mulloy, Francis
collection PubMed
description A simple method to quantify the kinematic chain in a propulsive task would facilitate assessment of athlete effectiveness. The study’s aim was to assess if the kinematic chain distinguishes between skill levels. Fencers were separated into two groups based on attacking lunge ability (7 skilled; 8 novices). Rear leg 3D joint angular extension velocity magnitudes and timings, sword kinematics and rear leg kinetics were obtained in the propulsion phase of the attacking lunge. Skilled fencers obtained greater sword velocity (3.24 ± 0.24 m∙s−1 vs. 2.69 ± 0.29 m∙s−1; p = 0.02). The skilled group had a greater sequential kinematic chain of the hip, knee and ankle, demonstrated by significantly greater ankle angular velocity (9.1 ± 2.1 rad·s−1 skilled; 5.4 ± 2.9 rad·s−1 novice).  Ankle plantarflexion velocity showed a strong positive correlation with horizontal peak force (r = 0.81; p < 0.01). The skilled group demonstrated greater horizontal impulse (1.85 ± 0.29 N·s·kg−1 skilled; 1.45 ± 0.32 N·s·kg−1 novice), suggesting greater effectiveness in applying the kinematic chain towards horizontal propulsion. Analysis of the kinematic chain, which was able to distinguish between skill levels in a propulsive task, is an effective and simple paradigm to assess whole limb contributions to propulsive movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7857475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78574752021-06-15 An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge Mulloy, Francis Mullineaux, David R. Graham-Smith, Phillip Irwin, Gareth Int Biomech Articles A simple method to quantify the kinematic chain in a propulsive task would facilitate assessment of athlete effectiveness. The study’s aim was to assess if the kinematic chain distinguishes between skill levels. Fencers were separated into two groups based on attacking lunge ability (7 skilled; 8 novices). Rear leg 3D joint angular extension velocity magnitudes and timings, sword kinematics and rear leg kinetics were obtained in the propulsion phase of the attacking lunge. Skilled fencers obtained greater sword velocity (3.24 ± 0.24 m∙s−1 vs. 2.69 ± 0.29 m∙s−1; p = 0.02). The skilled group had a greater sequential kinematic chain of the hip, knee and ankle, demonstrated by significantly greater ankle angular velocity (9.1 ± 2.1 rad·s−1 skilled; 5.4 ± 2.9 rad·s−1 novice).  Ankle plantarflexion velocity showed a strong positive correlation with horizontal peak force (r = 0.81; p < 0.01). The skilled group demonstrated greater horizontal impulse (1.85 ± 0.29 N·s·kg−1 skilled; 1.45 ± 0.32 N·s·kg−1 novice), suggesting greater effectiveness in applying the kinematic chain towards horizontal propulsion. Analysis of the kinematic chain, which was able to distinguish between skill levels in a propulsive task, is an effective and simple paradigm to assess whole limb contributions to propulsive movements. Taylor & Francis 2018-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7857475/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1454342 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Mulloy, Francis
Mullineaux, David R.
Graham-Smith, Phillip
Irwin, Gareth
An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge
title An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge
title_full An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge
title_fullStr An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge
title_full_unstemmed An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge
title_short An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge
title_sort applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: an example using the fencing foil attacking lunge
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857475/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1454342
work_keys_str_mv AT mulloyfrancis anappliedparadigmforsimpleanalysisofthelowerlimbkinematicchaininexplosivemovementsanexampleusingthefencingfoilattackinglunge
AT mullineauxdavidr anappliedparadigmforsimpleanalysisofthelowerlimbkinematicchaininexplosivemovementsanexampleusingthefencingfoilattackinglunge
AT grahamsmithphillip anappliedparadigmforsimpleanalysisofthelowerlimbkinematicchaininexplosivemovementsanexampleusingthefencingfoilattackinglunge
AT irwingareth anappliedparadigmforsimpleanalysisofthelowerlimbkinematicchaininexplosivemovementsanexampleusingthefencingfoilattackinglunge
AT mulloyfrancis appliedparadigmforsimpleanalysisofthelowerlimbkinematicchaininexplosivemovementsanexampleusingthefencingfoilattackinglunge
AT mullineauxdavidr appliedparadigmforsimpleanalysisofthelowerlimbkinematicchaininexplosivemovementsanexampleusingthefencingfoilattackinglunge
AT grahamsmithphillip appliedparadigmforsimpleanalysisofthelowerlimbkinematicchaininexplosivemovementsanexampleusingthefencingfoilattackinglunge
AT irwingareth appliedparadigmforsimpleanalysisofthelowerlimbkinematicchaininexplosivemovementsanexampleusingthefencingfoilattackinglunge