Cargando…
How sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation?
Musculoskeletal modeling is an important tool to estimate knee loads. In these models, anatomical muscles are frequently sub-divided to account for wide origin/insertion areas. The specific sub-division has been shown to affect some muscle recruitment criteria and it has been suggested that normaliz...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857479/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1514278 |
_version_ | 1783646451003293696 |
---|---|
author | Andersen, Michael Skipper |
author_facet | Andersen, Michael Skipper |
author_sort | Andersen, Michael Skipper |
collection | PubMed |
description | Musculoskeletal modeling is an important tool to estimate knee loads. In these models, anatomical muscles are frequently sub-divided to account for wide origin/insertion areas. The specific sub-division has been shown to affect some muscle recruitment criteria and it has been suggested that normalization factors should be incorporated into models. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different muscle normalization factors in the muscle recruitment criterion and polynomial order on the estimated muscle and total, medial and lateral knee contact forces during gait. These were evaluated on three different musculoskeletal models with increasing levels of patient-specificity and knee joint model complexity for one subject from the Grand Challenge data set and evaluated against measured forces. The results showed that the introduction of the muscle normalization factors affected the estimated forces and that this effect was most pronounced when a polynomial of order two was applied. Additionally, mainly the second contact force peak was affected. Secondary investigations revealed that the predicted forces can vary substantially as a function of the knee flexor and extensor muscle strength with over one body weight difference in predicted total compressive force between 100% and 40% of the strength. Additionally, the predicted second peak during gait was found to be sensitive to the position of the pelvic skin marker positions in the model. These results imply that caution should be taken when a normalization factor is introduced to account for sub-divided muscles especially for second-order recruitment criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7857479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78574792021-06-15 How sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation? Andersen, Michael Skipper Int Biomech Articles Musculoskeletal modeling is an important tool to estimate knee loads. In these models, anatomical muscles are frequently sub-divided to account for wide origin/insertion areas. The specific sub-division has been shown to affect some muscle recruitment criteria and it has been suggested that normalization factors should be incorporated into models. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different muscle normalization factors in the muscle recruitment criterion and polynomial order on the estimated muscle and total, medial and lateral knee contact forces during gait. These were evaluated on three different musculoskeletal models with increasing levels of patient-specificity and knee joint model complexity for one subject from the Grand Challenge data set and evaluated against measured forces. The results showed that the introduction of the muscle normalization factors affected the estimated forces and that this effect was most pronounced when a polynomial of order two was applied. Additionally, mainly the second contact force peak was affected. Secondary investigations revealed that the predicted forces can vary substantially as a function of the knee flexor and extensor muscle strength with over one body weight difference in predicted total compressive force between 100% and 40% of the strength. Additionally, the predicted second peak during gait was found to be sensitive to the position of the pelvic skin marker positions in the model. These results imply that caution should be taken when a normalization factor is introduced to account for sub-divided muscles especially for second-order recruitment criteria. Taylor & Francis 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7857479/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1514278 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Andersen, Michael Skipper How sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation? |
title | How sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation? |
title_full | How sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation? |
title_fullStr | How sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation? |
title_full_unstemmed | How sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation? |
title_short | How sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation? |
title_sort | how sensitive are predicted muscle and knee contact forces to normalization factors and polynomial order in the muscle recruitment criterion formulation? |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857479/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2018.1514278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersenmichaelskipper howsensitivearepredictedmuscleandkneecontactforcestonormalizationfactorsandpolynomialorderinthemusclerecruitmentcriterionformulation |