Cargando…
Robotic parastomal hernia repair
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Annually, more than one hundred thousand new stomas are created in the United States and near 30-50% of those will develop parastomal hernia ( 1 ). Occasionally parastomal hernias may result in life threatening complications such as bowel obstruction or strangulation requ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857754/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0347 |
_version_ | 1783646503909195776 |
---|---|
author | Tobias-Machado, Marcos Gomes, Daniel Coser Faria, Eliney Ferreira Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos |
author_facet | Tobias-Machado, Marcos Gomes, Daniel Coser Faria, Eliney Ferreira Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos |
author_sort | Tobias-Machado, Marcos |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Annually, more than one hundred thousand new stomas are created in the United States and near 30-50% of those will develop parastomal hernia ( 1 ). Occasionally parastomal hernias may result in life threatening complications such as bowel obstruction or strangulation requiring urgent surgical intervention ( 2 ). The minimally invasive surgery for these hernias are preferred, specially when the primary case was either laparoscopic or robot-assisted. Our objective is to demonstrate a step-by-step robotic approach with and without mesh placement and their outcomes in two different scenarios: elective and emergency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present two cases, a 56-year-old male with three years prior robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit and a 82-year-old male with five year post operation of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bilateral ureterostomies. Both of them had parastomal hernia, the first case was an urgency due to bowel obstruction while the second case was an elective procedure. Using three portals, we choose the primary repair for the first case and placement of a biological mesh within the keyhole technique ( 3 ) for the second one. RESULTS: In the first case we had an operative time of 110min, total blood loss of 40cc and for the second case an operative time of 140min with total blood loss of 20cc. Both patients were discharged within 24h and had a follow-up of 2 years with no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The capability for complex sutures and dissection of intracorporeal structures makes the robotic platform a powerful ally ( 4 ) and we believe in its superiority over conventional laparoscopy. Although further studies are required, our initial series suggests that the robotic parastomal hernia repair is feasible and reproducible, with or without mesh placement and could be demonstrated its use for either elective or emergency situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7857754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78577542021-02-06 Robotic parastomal hernia repair Tobias-Machado, Marcos Gomes, Daniel Coser Faria, Eliney Ferreira Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos Int Braz J Urol Video Section INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Annually, more than one hundred thousand new stomas are created in the United States and near 30-50% of those will develop parastomal hernia ( 1 ). Occasionally parastomal hernias may result in life threatening complications such as bowel obstruction or strangulation requiring urgent surgical intervention ( 2 ). The minimally invasive surgery for these hernias are preferred, specially when the primary case was either laparoscopic or robot-assisted. Our objective is to demonstrate a step-by-step robotic approach with and without mesh placement and their outcomes in two different scenarios: elective and emergency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present two cases, a 56-year-old male with three years prior robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit and a 82-year-old male with five year post operation of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bilateral ureterostomies. Both of them had parastomal hernia, the first case was an urgency due to bowel obstruction while the second case was an elective procedure. Using three portals, we choose the primary repair for the first case and placement of a biological mesh within the keyhole technique ( 3 ) for the second one. RESULTS: In the first case we had an operative time of 110min, total blood loss of 40cc and for the second case an operative time of 140min with total blood loss of 20cc. Both patients were discharged within 24h and had a follow-up of 2 years with no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The capability for complex sutures and dissection of intracorporeal structures makes the robotic platform a powerful ally ( 4 ) and we believe in its superiority over conventional laparoscopy. Although further studies are required, our initial series suggests that the robotic parastomal hernia repair is feasible and reproducible, with or without mesh placement and could be demonstrated its use for either elective or emergency situations. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7857754/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0347 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Video Section Tobias-Machado, Marcos Gomes, Daniel Coser Faria, Eliney Ferreira Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos Robotic parastomal hernia repair |
title | Robotic parastomal hernia repair |
title_full | Robotic parastomal hernia repair |
title_fullStr | Robotic parastomal hernia repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic parastomal hernia repair |
title_short | Robotic parastomal hernia repair |
title_sort | robotic parastomal hernia repair |
topic | Video Section |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857754/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tobiasmachadomarcos roboticparastomalherniarepair AT gomesdanielcoser roboticparastomalherniarepair AT fariaelineyferreira roboticparastomalherniarepair AT zampollihamiltondecampos roboticparastomalherniarepair |