Cargando…

Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy of urorectal fistula (URF) repair using different approaches and the clinical factor determinant of success, and also the morbidity associated to the procedure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in male survivors of pelvic malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angulo, Javier C., Arance, Ignacio, Apesteguy, Yannick, Felicio, João, Martins, Natália, Martins, Francisco E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0476
_version_ 1783646507131469824
author Angulo, Javier C.
Arance, Ignacio
Apesteguy, Yannick
Felicio, João
Martins, Natália
Martins, Francisco E.
author_facet Angulo, Javier C.
Arance, Ignacio
Apesteguy, Yannick
Felicio, João
Martins, Natália
Martins, Francisco E.
author_sort Angulo, Javier C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy of urorectal fistula (URF) repair using different approaches and the clinical factor determinant of success, and also the morbidity associated to the procedure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in male survivors of pelvic malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 39 patients with URF primarily intervened in three institutions using different surgical approaches. Success was defined as effective fistula closure. Variables evaluated included demographics, previous treatments, surgical approach, ancillary surgeries, complications and HRQoL by using a standardized non-validated specific questionnaire. Median follow-up from surgery to interview was 55 months (interquartile range 49, range 4-112). Factors determinant of success were investigated using logistic regression. Safety of the procedure was evaluated by Clavien-Dindo scale. Deterioration of continence and erectile function and other HRQoL issues were evaluated. RESULTS: Prostate cancer treatment was the predominant etiology. The success rate for fistula repair was 89.5%. The surgical approach was not related to failed repair (p=0.35) or complications (p=0.29). Factors associated with failure were complications (p=0.025), radiotherapy (p=0.03), fistula location (p=0.04) and fistula size (p=0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed fistula size was the only independent determinant of failure (OR 6.904, 1.01-47.75). Complications occurred in 46.2% and severe complications in 12.8%. The mortality related to the procedure was 2.6%. Urinary incontinence was present before repair in 26.3% and erectile dysfunction in 89.5%. Fistula repair caused de novo urinary incontinence in 7.9% and deterioration of erectile status in 44.7%. Globally 79% were satisfied after repair and only 7.9% rated HRQoL as unhappy. Trans-sphincteric approach was related to less deterioration of erectile function (p=0.003), and higher perceived satisfaction in QoL (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical approach elected to correct URF is not determinant of success nor of complications. Fistula size appears as independent determinant for failure. Transsphincteric approach could be advantageous over other procedures regarding HRQoL issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7857768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78577682021-02-06 Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues Angulo, Javier C. Arance, Ignacio Apesteguy, Yannick Felicio, João Martins, Natália Martins, Francisco E. Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy of urorectal fistula (URF) repair using different approaches and the clinical factor determinant of success, and also the morbidity associated to the procedure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in male survivors of pelvic malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 39 patients with URF primarily intervened in three institutions using different surgical approaches. Success was defined as effective fistula closure. Variables evaluated included demographics, previous treatments, surgical approach, ancillary surgeries, complications and HRQoL by using a standardized non-validated specific questionnaire. Median follow-up from surgery to interview was 55 months (interquartile range 49, range 4-112). Factors determinant of success were investigated using logistic regression. Safety of the procedure was evaluated by Clavien-Dindo scale. Deterioration of continence and erectile function and other HRQoL issues were evaluated. RESULTS: Prostate cancer treatment was the predominant etiology. The success rate for fistula repair was 89.5%. The surgical approach was not related to failed repair (p=0.35) or complications (p=0.29). Factors associated with failure were complications (p=0.025), radiotherapy (p=0.03), fistula location (p=0.04) and fistula size (p=0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed fistula size was the only independent determinant of failure (OR 6.904, 1.01-47.75). Complications occurred in 46.2% and severe complications in 12.8%. The mortality related to the procedure was 2.6%. Urinary incontinence was present before repair in 26.3% and erectile dysfunction in 89.5%. Fistula repair caused de novo urinary incontinence in 7.9% and deterioration of erectile status in 44.7%. Globally 79% were satisfied after repair and only 7.9% rated HRQoL as unhappy. Trans-sphincteric approach was related to less deterioration of erectile function (p=0.003), and higher perceived satisfaction in QoL (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical approach elected to correct URF is not determinant of success nor of complications. Fistula size appears as independent determinant for failure. Transsphincteric approach could be advantageous over other procedures regarding HRQoL issues. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7857768/ /pubmed/33284543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0476 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Angulo, Javier C.
Arance, Ignacio
Apesteguy, Yannick
Felicio, João
Martins, Natália
Martins, Francisco E.
Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues
title Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues
title_full Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues
title_fullStr Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues
title_full_unstemmed Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues
title_short Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues
title_sort urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0476
work_keys_str_mv AT angulojavierc urorectalfistularepairusingdifferentapproachesoperativeresultsandqualityoflifeissues
AT aranceignacio urorectalfistularepairusingdifferentapproachesoperativeresultsandqualityoflifeissues
AT apesteguyyannick urorectalfistularepairusingdifferentapproachesoperativeresultsandqualityoflifeissues
AT feliciojoao urorectalfistularepairusingdifferentapproachesoperativeresultsandqualityoflifeissues
AT martinsnatalia urorectalfistularepairusingdifferentapproachesoperativeresultsandqualityoflifeissues
AT martinsfranciscoe urorectalfistularepairusingdifferentapproachesoperativeresultsandqualityoflifeissues