Cargando…

A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies

BACKGROUND: Different strategies can be used to counteract coagulation of extracorporeal systems. Systemic anticoagulation is most widely used in routine clinical practice, but can be contraindicated in specific settings. The Solacea(™) dialyser, containing the asymmetric triacetate membrane, claims...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanommeslaeghe, Floris, Josipovic, Iván, Boone, Matthieu, Dhondt, Annemie, Van Biesen, Wim, Eloot, Sunny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz163
_version_ 1783646512692068352
author Vanommeslaeghe, Floris
Josipovic, Iván
Boone, Matthieu
Dhondt, Annemie
Van Biesen, Wim
Eloot, Sunny
author_facet Vanommeslaeghe, Floris
Josipovic, Iván
Boone, Matthieu
Dhondt, Annemie
Van Biesen, Wim
Eloot, Sunny
author_sort Vanommeslaeghe, Floris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different strategies can be used to counteract coagulation of extracorporeal systems. Systemic anticoagulation is most widely used in routine clinical practice, but can be contraindicated in specific settings. The Solacea(™) dialyser, containing the asymmetric triacetate membrane, claims improved biocompatibility, which should result in decreased tendency for coagulation. We quantified the performance of the Solacea(™) versus the FX800CORDIAX dialyser regarding resistance to fibre blocking as assessed by micro-computed tomography (CT). METHODS: This cross-over study with four arms randomized consecutively 10 maintenance haemodialysis patients to a 4-h post-dilution haemodiafiltration session at midweek, using either Solacea(™) 19 H or FX800CORDIAX, with either regular or half dose of anticoagulation (EC2017/1459-NCT03820401). Dialyser fibre blocking was visualized in the dialyser outlet potting using a 3D CT scanning technique on micrometre resolution. Extraction ratios of middle molecules [myoglobin, lambda and kappa free light chains (FLCs)] were determined. RESULTS: The relative number of open fibres post-dialysis was lower in FX800CORDIAX versus Solacea(™) dialyser, and this was irrespective of the anticoagulation dose used or the threshold for counting open fibres. Extraction ratios of FLCs were not different at regular anticoagulation between Solacea(™) and FX800CORDIAX (21% ± 4% for kappa and 32% ± 8% for lambda with Solacea(™) versus 23% ± 7% and 38% ± 6% for FX800CORDIAX), but were superior with the Solacea(™) (34% ± 12% versus 22% ± 8% with FX800CORDIAX; P = 0.02) for myoglobin in case of halving anticoagulation dose. No clinically relevant albumin loss was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The Solacea(™) dialyser seems to be promising for use in conditions where systemic anticoagulation is contraindicated, as even under conditions of low systemic anticoagulation, virtually no signs of fibre blocking could be observed using the sensitive micro-CT scanning technique. This finding is in line with its presumed good performance in terms of biocompatibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7857793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78577932021-02-08 A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies Vanommeslaeghe, Floris Josipovic, Iván Boone, Matthieu Dhondt, Annemie Van Biesen, Wim Eloot, Sunny Clin Kidney J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Different strategies can be used to counteract coagulation of extracorporeal systems. Systemic anticoagulation is most widely used in routine clinical practice, but can be contraindicated in specific settings. The Solacea(™) dialyser, containing the asymmetric triacetate membrane, claims improved biocompatibility, which should result in decreased tendency for coagulation. We quantified the performance of the Solacea(™) versus the FX800CORDIAX dialyser regarding resistance to fibre blocking as assessed by micro-computed tomography (CT). METHODS: This cross-over study with four arms randomized consecutively 10 maintenance haemodialysis patients to a 4-h post-dilution haemodiafiltration session at midweek, using either Solacea(™) 19 H or FX800CORDIAX, with either regular or half dose of anticoagulation (EC2017/1459-NCT03820401). Dialyser fibre blocking was visualized in the dialyser outlet potting using a 3D CT scanning technique on micrometre resolution. Extraction ratios of middle molecules [myoglobin, lambda and kappa free light chains (FLCs)] were determined. RESULTS: The relative number of open fibres post-dialysis was lower in FX800CORDIAX versus Solacea(™) dialyser, and this was irrespective of the anticoagulation dose used or the threshold for counting open fibres. Extraction ratios of FLCs were not different at regular anticoagulation between Solacea(™) and FX800CORDIAX (21% ± 4% for kappa and 32% ± 8% for lambda with Solacea(™) versus 23% ± 7% and 38% ± 6% for FX800CORDIAX), but were superior with the Solacea(™) (34% ± 12% versus 22% ± 8% with FX800CORDIAX; P = 0.02) for myoglobin in case of halving anticoagulation dose. No clinically relevant albumin loss was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The Solacea(™) dialyser seems to be promising for use in conditions where systemic anticoagulation is contraindicated, as even under conditions of low systemic anticoagulation, virtually no signs of fibre blocking could be observed using the sensitive micro-CT scanning technique. This finding is in line with its presumed good performance in terms of biocompatibility. Oxford University Press 2019-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7857793/ /pubmed/33564444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz163 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Vanommeslaeghe, Floris
Josipovic, Iván
Boone, Matthieu
Dhondt, Annemie
Van Biesen, Wim
Eloot, Sunny
A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies
title A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies
title_full A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies
title_fullStr A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies
title_full_unstemmed A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies
title_short A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies
title_sort randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz163
work_keys_str_mv AT vanommeslaeghefloris arandomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT josipovicivan arandomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT boonematthieu arandomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT dhondtannemie arandomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT vanbiesenwim arandomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT elootsunny arandomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT vanommeslaeghefloris randomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT josipovicivan randomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT boonematthieu randomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT dhondtannemie randomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT vanbiesenwim randomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies
AT elootsunny randomizedcrossoverstudywithobjectivequantificationoftheperformanceofanasymmetrictriacetateandapolysulfonedialysismembraneusingdifferentanticoagulationstrategies