Cargando…
Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: The evidence concerning which physical exercise characteristics are most effective for older adults is fragmented. We aimed to characterize the extent of this diversity and inconsistency and identify future directions for research by undertaking a systematic review of meta-analyses of ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Shanghai University of Sport
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7858023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.003 |
_version_ | 1783646564941561856 |
---|---|
author | Di Lorito, Claudio Long, Annabelle Byrne, Adrian Harwood, Rowan H. Gladman, John R.F. Schneider, Stefan Logan, Pip Bosco, Alessandro van der Wardt, Veronika |
author_facet | Di Lorito, Claudio Long, Annabelle Byrne, Adrian Harwood, Rowan H. Gladman, John R.F. Schneider, Stefan Logan, Pip Bosco, Alessandro van der Wardt, Veronika |
author_sort | Di Lorito, Claudio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The evidence concerning which physical exercise characteristics are most effective for older adults is fragmented. We aimed to characterize the extent of this diversity and inconsistency and identify future directions for research by undertaking a systematic review of meta-analyses of exercise interventions in older adults. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science for articles that met the following criteria: (1) meta-analyses that synthesized measures of improvement (e.g., effect sizes) on any outcome identified in studies of exercise interventions; (2) participants in the studies meta-analyzed were adults aged 65+ or had a mean age of 70+; (3) meta-analyses that included studies of any type of exercise, including its duration, frequency, intensity, and mode of delivery; (4) interventions that included multiple components (e.g., exercise and cognitive stimulation), with effect sizes that were computed separately for the exercise component; and (5) meta-analyses that were published in any year or language. The characteristics of the reviews, of the interventions, and of the parameters improved through exercise were reported through narrative synthesis. Identification of the interventions linked to the largest improvements was carried out by identifying the highest values for improvement recorded across the reviews. The study included 56 meta-analyses that were heterogeneous in relation to population, sample size, settings, outcomes, and intervention characteristics. RESULTS: The largest effect sizes for improvement were found for resistance training, meditative movement interventions, and exercise-based active videogames. CONCLUSION: The review identified important gaps in research, including a lack of studies investigating the benefits of group interventions, the characteristics of professionals delivering the interventions associated with better outcomes, and the impact of motivational strategies and of significant others (e.g., carers) on intervention delivery and outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7858023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Shanghai University of Sport |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78580232021-02-05 Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses Di Lorito, Claudio Long, Annabelle Byrne, Adrian Harwood, Rowan H. Gladman, John R.F. Schneider, Stefan Logan, Pip Bosco, Alessandro van der Wardt, Veronika J Sport Health Sci Review BACKGROUND: The evidence concerning which physical exercise characteristics are most effective for older adults is fragmented. We aimed to characterize the extent of this diversity and inconsistency and identify future directions for research by undertaking a systematic review of meta-analyses of exercise interventions in older adults. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science for articles that met the following criteria: (1) meta-analyses that synthesized measures of improvement (e.g., effect sizes) on any outcome identified in studies of exercise interventions; (2) participants in the studies meta-analyzed were adults aged 65+ or had a mean age of 70+; (3) meta-analyses that included studies of any type of exercise, including its duration, frequency, intensity, and mode of delivery; (4) interventions that included multiple components (e.g., exercise and cognitive stimulation), with effect sizes that were computed separately for the exercise component; and (5) meta-analyses that were published in any year or language. The characteristics of the reviews, of the interventions, and of the parameters improved through exercise were reported through narrative synthesis. Identification of the interventions linked to the largest improvements was carried out by identifying the highest values for improvement recorded across the reviews. The study included 56 meta-analyses that were heterogeneous in relation to population, sample size, settings, outcomes, and intervention characteristics. RESULTS: The largest effect sizes for improvement were found for resistance training, meditative movement interventions, and exercise-based active videogames. CONCLUSION: The review identified important gaps in research, including a lack of studies investigating the benefits of group interventions, the characteristics of professionals delivering the interventions associated with better outcomes, and the impact of motivational strategies and of significant others (e.g., carers) on intervention delivery and outcomes. Shanghai University of Sport 2021-01 2020-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7858023/ /pubmed/32525097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.003 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Di Lorito, Claudio Long, Annabelle Byrne, Adrian Harwood, Rowan H. Gladman, John R.F. Schneider, Stefan Logan, Pip Bosco, Alessandro van der Wardt, Veronika Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses |
title | Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses |
title_full | Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses |
title_fullStr | Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses |
title_short | Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses |
title_sort | exercise interventions for older adults: a systematic review of meta-analyses |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7858023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diloritoclaudio exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses AT longannabelle exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses AT byrneadrian exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses AT harwoodrowanh exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses AT gladmanjohnrf exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses AT schneiderstefan exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses AT loganpip exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses AT boscoalessandro exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses AT vanderwardtveronika exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses |