Cargando…

Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses

BACKGROUND: The evidence concerning which physical exercise characteristics are most effective for older adults is fragmented. We aimed to characterize the extent of this diversity and inconsistency and identify future directions for research by undertaking a systematic review of meta-analyses of ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Lorito, Claudio, Long, Annabelle, Byrne, Adrian, Harwood, Rowan H., Gladman, John R.F., Schneider, Stefan, Logan, Pip, Bosco, Alessandro, van der Wardt, Veronika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shanghai University of Sport 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7858023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.003
_version_ 1783646564941561856
author Di Lorito, Claudio
Long, Annabelle
Byrne, Adrian
Harwood, Rowan H.
Gladman, John R.F.
Schneider, Stefan
Logan, Pip
Bosco, Alessandro
van der Wardt, Veronika
author_facet Di Lorito, Claudio
Long, Annabelle
Byrne, Adrian
Harwood, Rowan H.
Gladman, John R.F.
Schneider, Stefan
Logan, Pip
Bosco, Alessandro
van der Wardt, Veronika
author_sort Di Lorito, Claudio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evidence concerning which physical exercise characteristics are most effective for older adults is fragmented. We aimed to characterize the extent of this diversity and inconsistency and identify future directions for research by undertaking a systematic review of meta-analyses of exercise interventions in older adults. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science for articles that met the following criteria: (1) meta-analyses that synthesized measures of improvement (e.g., effect sizes) on any outcome identified in studies of exercise interventions; (2) participants in the studies meta-analyzed were adults aged 65+ or had a mean age of 70+; (3) meta-analyses that included studies of any type of exercise, including its duration, frequency, intensity, and mode of delivery; (4) interventions that included multiple components (e.g., exercise and cognitive stimulation), with effect sizes that were computed separately for the exercise component; and (5) meta-analyses that were published in any year or language. The characteristics of the reviews, of the interventions, and of the parameters improved through exercise were reported through narrative synthesis. Identification of the interventions linked to the largest improvements was carried out by identifying the highest values for improvement recorded across the reviews. The study included 56 meta-analyses that were heterogeneous in relation to population, sample size, settings, outcomes, and intervention characteristics. RESULTS: The largest effect sizes for improvement were found for resistance training, meditative movement interventions, and exercise-based active videogames. CONCLUSION: The review identified important gaps in research, including a lack of studies investigating the benefits of group interventions, the characteristics of professionals delivering the interventions associated with better outcomes, and the impact of motivational strategies and of significant others (e.g., carers) on intervention delivery and outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7858023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shanghai University of Sport
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78580232021-02-05 Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses Di Lorito, Claudio Long, Annabelle Byrne, Adrian Harwood, Rowan H. Gladman, John R.F. Schneider, Stefan Logan, Pip Bosco, Alessandro van der Wardt, Veronika J Sport Health Sci Review BACKGROUND: The evidence concerning which physical exercise characteristics are most effective for older adults is fragmented. We aimed to characterize the extent of this diversity and inconsistency and identify future directions for research by undertaking a systematic review of meta-analyses of exercise interventions in older adults. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science for articles that met the following criteria: (1) meta-analyses that synthesized measures of improvement (e.g., effect sizes) on any outcome identified in studies of exercise interventions; (2) participants in the studies meta-analyzed were adults aged 65+ or had a mean age of 70+; (3) meta-analyses that included studies of any type of exercise, including its duration, frequency, intensity, and mode of delivery; (4) interventions that included multiple components (e.g., exercise and cognitive stimulation), with effect sizes that were computed separately for the exercise component; and (5) meta-analyses that were published in any year or language. The characteristics of the reviews, of the interventions, and of the parameters improved through exercise were reported through narrative synthesis. Identification of the interventions linked to the largest improvements was carried out by identifying the highest values for improvement recorded across the reviews. The study included 56 meta-analyses that were heterogeneous in relation to population, sample size, settings, outcomes, and intervention characteristics. RESULTS: The largest effect sizes for improvement were found for resistance training, meditative movement interventions, and exercise-based active videogames. CONCLUSION: The review identified important gaps in research, including a lack of studies investigating the benefits of group interventions, the characteristics of professionals delivering the interventions associated with better outcomes, and the impact of motivational strategies and of significant others (e.g., carers) on intervention delivery and outcomes. Shanghai University of Sport 2021-01 2020-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7858023/ /pubmed/32525097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.003 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Di Lorito, Claudio
Long, Annabelle
Byrne, Adrian
Harwood, Rowan H.
Gladman, John R.F.
Schneider, Stefan
Logan, Pip
Bosco, Alessandro
van der Wardt, Veronika
Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses
title Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses
title_full Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses
title_fullStr Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses
title_short Exercise interventions for older adults: A systematic review of meta-analyses
title_sort exercise interventions for older adults: a systematic review of meta-analyses
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7858023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.003
work_keys_str_mv AT diloritoclaudio exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT longannabelle exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT byrneadrian exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT harwoodrowanh exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT gladmanjohnrf exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT schneiderstefan exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT loganpip exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT boscoalessandro exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT vanderwardtveronika exerciseinterventionsforolderadultsasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses