Cargando…

Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation

PURPOSE: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may require extensive X-ray usage. We evaluated the impact of preoperative surgeon briefing regarding the inclusion and evaluation of fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) in a multicenter study on the applied X-ray usage. METHODS: A prospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hein, Simon, Wilhelm, Konrad, Miernik, Arkadiusz, Schoenthaler, Martin, Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo, Gratzke, Christian, Salem, Johannes, Karapanos, Leonidas, Netsch, Christopher, Becker, Benedikt, Secker, Armin, Veser, Julian, Neisius, Andreas, Fritsche, Hans-Martin, Schnabel, Marco Julius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7858553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32200411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03160-9
_version_ 1783646623521308672
author Hein, Simon
Wilhelm, Konrad
Miernik, Arkadiusz
Schoenthaler, Martin
Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
Gratzke, Christian
Salem, Johannes
Karapanos, Leonidas
Netsch, Christopher
Becker, Benedikt
Secker, Armin
Veser, Julian
Neisius, Andreas
Fritsche, Hans-Martin
Schnabel, Marco Julius
author_facet Hein, Simon
Wilhelm, Konrad
Miernik, Arkadiusz
Schoenthaler, Martin
Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
Gratzke, Christian
Salem, Johannes
Karapanos, Leonidas
Netsch, Christopher
Becker, Benedikt
Secker, Armin
Veser, Julian
Neisius, Andreas
Fritsche, Hans-Martin
Schnabel, Marco Julius
author_sort Hein, Simon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may require extensive X-ray usage. We evaluated the impact of preoperative surgeon briefing regarding the inclusion and evaluation of fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) in a multicenter study on the applied X-ray usage. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study of 6 tertiary centers was performed. Each center recruited up to 25 prospective patients with renal stones of any size for RIRS. Prior to study´s onset, all surgeons were briefed about hazards of radiation and on strategies to avoid high doses in RIRS. Prospective procedures were compared to past procedures, as baseline data. FT was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary parameters were stone-free rate (SFR), complications according to the Clavien, SATAVA and postureteroscopic lesion scale. Results were analyzed using T test, chi-squared test, univariate analysis and confirmed in a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: 303 patients were included (145 retro- and 158 prospective). Mean FT and DAP were reduced from 130.8 s/565.8 to 77.4 s/357.8 (p < 0.05). SFR was improved from 85.5% to 93% (p < 0.05). Complications did not vary significantly. Neither stone position (p = 0.569), prestenting (p = 0.419), nor surgeons’ experience (> 100 RIRS) had a significant impact on FT. Significant univariate parameters were confirmed in a multivariate model, revealing X-ray training to be radiation protective (OR − 44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased surgeon awareness of X-ray exposure risks has a significant impact on FT and DAP. This “awareness effect” is a simple method to reduce radiation exposure for the patient and OR staff without the procedures´ outcome and safety being affected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7858553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78585532021-02-11 Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation Hein, Simon Wilhelm, Konrad Miernik, Arkadiusz Schoenthaler, Martin Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo Gratzke, Christian Salem, Johannes Karapanos, Leonidas Netsch, Christopher Becker, Benedikt Secker, Armin Veser, Julian Neisius, Andreas Fritsche, Hans-Martin Schnabel, Marco Julius World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may require extensive X-ray usage. We evaluated the impact of preoperative surgeon briefing regarding the inclusion and evaluation of fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) in a multicenter study on the applied X-ray usage. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study of 6 tertiary centers was performed. Each center recruited up to 25 prospective patients with renal stones of any size for RIRS. Prior to study´s onset, all surgeons were briefed about hazards of radiation and on strategies to avoid high doses in RIRS. Prospective procedures were compared to past procedures, as baseline data. FT was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary parameters were stone-free rate (SFR), complications according to the Clavien, SATAVA and postureteroscopic lesion scale. Results were analyzed using T test, chi-squared test, univariate analysis and confirmed in a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: 303 patients were included (145 retro- and 158 prospective). Mean FT and DAP were reduced from 130.8 s/565.8 to 77.4 s/357.8 (p < 0.05). SFR was improved from 85.5% to 93% (p < 0.05). Complications did not vary significantly. Neither stone position (p = 0.569), prestenting (p = 0.419), nor surgeons’ experience (> 100 RIRS) had a significant impact on FT. Significant univariate parameters were confirmed in a multivariate model, revealing X-ray training to be radiation protective (OR − 44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased surgeon awareness of X-ray exposure risks has a significant impact on FT and DAP. This “awareness effect” is a simple method to reduce radiation exposure for the patient and OR staff without the procedures´ outcome and safety being affected. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7858553/ /pubmed/32200411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03160-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hein, Simon
Wilhelm, Konrad
Miernik, Arkadiusz
Schoenthaler, Martin
Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
Gratzke, Christian
Salem, Johannes
Karapanos, Leonidas
Netsch, Christopher
Becker, Benedikt
Secker, Armin
Veser, Julian
Neisius, Andreas
Fritsche, Hans-Martin
Schnabel, Marco Julius
Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation
title Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation
title_full Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation
title_fullStr Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation
title_short Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation
title_sort radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (rirs): a prospective multicenter evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7858553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32200411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03160-9
work_keys_str_mv AT heinsimon radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT wilhelmkonrad radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT miernikarkadiusz radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT schoenthalermartin radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT suarezibarrolarodrigo radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT gratzkechristian radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT salemjohannes radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT karapanosleonidas radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT netschchristopher radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT beckerbenedikt radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT seckerarmin radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT veserjulian radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT neisiusandreas radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT fritschehansmartin radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation
AT schnabelmarcojulius radiationexposureduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryrirsaprospectivemulticenterevaluation