Cargando…

Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yi-Jui, Yang, Hou-Ting, Yao, Melissa Min-Szu, Lin, Shao-Chieh, Cho, Der-Yang, Shen, Wu-Chung, Juan, Chun-Jung, Chan, Wing P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6
_version_ 1783646680625709056
author Liu, Yi-Jui
Yang, Hou-Ting
Yao, Melissa Min-Szu
Lin, Shao-Chieh
Cho, Der-Yang
Shen, Wu-Chung
Juan, Chun-Jung
Chan, Wing P.
author_facet Liu, Yi-Jui
Yang, Hou-Ting
Yao, Melissa Min-Szu
Lin, Shao-Chieh
Cho, Der-Yang
Shen, Wu-Chung
Juan, Chun-Jung
Chan, Wing P.
author_sort Liu, Yi-Jui
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters K(trans), v(e), and v(p), derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal–Wallis test with a Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, K(trans) and v(e) increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but v(p) increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated K(trans) and v(e) were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78592142021-02-04 Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function Liu, Yi-Jui Yang, Hou-Ting Yao, Melissa Min-Szu Lin, Shao-Chieh Cho, Der-Yang Shen, Wu-Chung Juan, Chun-Jung Chan, Wing P. Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters K(trans), v(e), and v(p), derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal–Wallis test with a Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, K(trans) and v(e) increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but v(p) increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated K(trans) and v(e) were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7859214/ /pubmed/33536471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Yi-Jui
Yang, Hou-Ting
Yao, Melissa Min-Szu
Lin, Shao-Chieh
Cho, Der-Yang
Shen, Wu-Chung
Juan, Chun-Jung
Chan, Wing P.
Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function
title Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function
title_full Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function
title_fullStr Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function
title_short Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function
title_sort quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a tofts model on dce-mri using segmental versus aortic arterial input function
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyijui quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction
AT yanghouting quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction
AT yaomelissaminszu quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction
AT linshaochieh quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction
AT choderyang quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction
AT shenwuchung quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction
AT juanchunjung quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction
AT chanwingp quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction