Cargando…
Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight he...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6 |
_version_ | 1783646680625709056 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yi-Jui Yang, Hou-Ting Yao, Melissa Min-Szu Lin, Shao-Chieh Cho, Der-Yang Shen, Wu-Chung Juan, Chun-Jung Chan, Wing P. |
author_facet | Liu, Yi-Jui Yang, Hou-Ting Yao, Melissa Min-Szu Lin, Shao-Chieh Cho, Der-Yang Shen, Wu-Chung Juan, Chun-Jung Chan, Wing P. |
author_sort | Liu, Yi-Jui |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters K(trans), v(e), and v(p), derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal–Wallis test with a Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, K(trans) and v(e) increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but v(p) increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated K(trans) and v(e) were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7859214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78592142021-02-04 Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function Liu, Yi-Jui Yang, Hou-Ting Yao, Melissa Min-Szu Lin, Shao-Chieh Cho, Der-Yang Shen, Wu-Chung Juan, Chun-Jung Chan, Wing P. Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters K(trans), v(e), and v(p), derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal–Wallis test with a Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, K(trans) and v(e) increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but v(p) increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated K(trans) and v(e) were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7859214/ /pubmed/33536471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Yi-Jui Yang, Hou-Ting Yao, Melissa Min-Szu Lin, Shao-Chieh Cho, Der-Yang Shen, Wu-Chung Juan, Chun-Jung Chan, Wing P. Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function |
title | Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function |
title_full | Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function |
title_fullStr | Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function |
title_short | Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function |
title_sort | quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a tofts model on dce-mri using segmental versus aortic arterial input function |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyijui quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction AT yanghouting quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction AT yaomelissaminszu quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction AT linshaochieh quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction AT choderyang quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction AT shenwuchung quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction AT juanchunjung quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction AT chanwingp quantifyinglumbarvertebralperfusionbyatoftsmodelondcemriusingsegmentalversusaorticarterialinputfunction |