Cargando…

Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac

BACKGROUND: Many authors stated that cavities or air-gaps were the main challenge of dose calculation for head and neck with flattening filter medical linear accelerator (Linac) irradiation. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of air-gap dose calculation on flattening-filter-free (FFF)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azzi, A., Ryangga, D., Pawiro, S. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564636
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2004-1096
_version_ 1783646717859594240
author Azzi, A.
Ryangga, D.
Pawiro, S. A.
author_facet Azzi, A.
Ryangga, D.
Pawiro, S. A.
author_sort Azzi, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many authors stated that cavities or air-gaps were the main challenge of dose calculation for head and neck with flattening filter medical linear accelerator (Linac) irradiation. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of air-gap dose calculation on flattening-filter-free (FFF) small field irradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this comparative study, we did the experimental and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to evaluate the presence of heterogeneities in radiotherapy. We simulated the dose distribution on virtual phantom and the patient’s CT image to determine the air-gap effect of open small field and modulated photon beam, respectively. The dose ratio of air-gaps to tissue-equivalent was calculated both in Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and MC. RESULTS: We found that the dose ratio of air to tissue-equivalent tends to decrease with a larger field size. This correlation was linear with a slope of -0.198±0.001 and -0.161±0.014 for both AAA and MC, respectively. On the other hand, the dose ratio below the air-gap was field size-dependent. The AAA to MC dose calculation as the impact of air-gap thickness and field size varied from 1.57% to 5.35% after the gap. Besides, patient’s skin and oral cavity on head and neck case received a large dose discrepancy according to this study. CONCLUSION: The dose air to tissue-equivalent ratio decreased with smaller air gaps and larger field sizes. Dose correction for AAA calculation of open small field size should be considered after small air-gaps. However, delivered beam from others gantry angle reduced this effect on clinical case.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78593732021-02-08 Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac Azzi, A. Ryangga, D. Pawiro, S. A. J Biomed Phys Eng Original BACKGROUND: Many authors stated that cavities or air-gaps were the main challenge of dose calculation for head and neck with flattening filter medical linear accelerator (Linac) irradiation. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of air-gap dose calculation on flattening-filter-free (FFF) small field irradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this comparative study, we did the experimental and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to evaluate the presence of heterogeneities in radiotherapy. We simulated the dose distribution on virtual phantom and the patient’s CT image to determine the air-gap effect of open small field and modulated photon beam, respectively. The dose ratio of air-gaps to tissue-equivalent was calculated both in Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and MC. RESULTS: We found that the dose ratio of air to tissue-equivalent tends to decrease with a larger field size. This correlation was linear with a slope of -0.198±0.001 and -0.161±0.014 for both AAA and MC, respectively. On the other hand, the dose ratio below the air-gap was field size-dependent. The AAA to MC dose calculation as the impact of air-gap thickness and field size varied from 1.57% to 5.35% after the gap. Besides, patient’s skin and oral cavity on head and neck case received a large dose discrepancy according to this study. CONCLUSION: The dose air to tissue-equivalent ratio decreased with smaller air gaps and larger field sizes. Dose correction for AAA calculation of open small field size should be considered after small air-gaps. However, delivered beam from others gantry angle reduced this effect on clinical case. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7859373/ /pubmed/33564636 http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2004-1096 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original
Azzi, A.
Ryangga, D.
Pawiro, S. A.
Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac
title Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac
title_full Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac
title_fullStr Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac
title_short Comparison of Air-Gaps Effect in a Small Cavity on Dose Calculation for 6 MV Linac
title_sort comparison of air-gaps effect in a small cavity on dose calculation for 6 mv linac
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564636
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2004-1096
work_keys_str_mv AT azzia comparisonofairgapseffectinasmallcavityondosecalculationfor6mvlinac
AT ryanggad comparisonofairgapseffectinasmallcavityondosecalculationfor6mvlinac
AT pawirosa comparisonofairgapseffectinasmallcavityondosecalculationfor6mvlinac