Cargando…

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature

OBJECTIVE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) helps to identify lesion of prostate with reasonable accuracy. We aim to describe the various uses of MP-MRI for prostate biopsy comparing different techniques of MP-MRI guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh, Samavedi, Srinivas, Moschovas, Marcio Covas, Onol, Fikret Fatih, Roof, Shannon, Rogers, Travis, Patel, Vipul R., Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Second Military Medical University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2020.07.001
_version_ 1783646729211478016
author Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh
Samavedi, Srinivas
Moschovas, Marcio Covas
Onol, Fikret Fatih
Roof, Shannon
Rogers, Travis
Patel, Vipul R.
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
author_facet Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh
Samavedi, Srinivas
Moschovas, Marcio Covas
Onol, Fikret Fatih
Roof, Shannon
Rogers, Travis
Patel, Vipul R.
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
author_sort Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) helps to identify lesion of prostate with reasonable accuracy. We aim to describe the various uses of MP-MRI for prostate biopsy comparing different techniques of MP-MRI guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed for “multiparametric MRI”, “MRI fusion biopsy”, “MRI guided biopsy”, “prostate biopsy”, “MRI cognitive biopsy”, “MRI fusion biopsy systems”, “prostate biopsy” and “cost analysis”. The search operation was performed using the operator “OR” and “AND” with the above key words. All relevant systematic reviews, original articles, case series, and case reports were selected for this review. RESULTS: The sensitivity of MRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is between 91%–93%, and the specificity is between 36%–41% in various studies. It also has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%–92% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 51%–52%. The yield of MRI fusion biopsy (MRI-FB) is similar, if not superior to MR cognitive biopsy. In-bore MRI-TB had better detection rates compared to MR cognitive biopsy, but were similar to MR fusion biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRI guidance in prostate biopsy is inevitable, subject to availability, cost, and experience. Any one of the three modalities (i.e. MRI cognitive, MRI fusion and MRI in-bore approach) can be used. MRI-FB has a fine balance with regards to accuracy, practicality and affordability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Second Military Medical University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78594202021-02-09 Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Samavedi, Srinivas Moschovas, Marcio Covas Onol, Fikret Fatih Roof, Shannon Rogers, Travis Patel, Vipul R. Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan Asian J Urol Review OBJECTIVE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) helps to identify lesion of prostate with reasonable accuracy. We aim to describe the various uses of MP-MRI for prostate biopsy comparing different techniques of MP-MRI guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed for “multiparametric MRI”, “MRI fusion biopsy”, “MRI guided biopsy”, “prostate biopsy”, “MRI cognitive biopsy”, “MRI fusion biopsy systems”, “prostate biopsy” and “cost analysis”. The search operation was performed using the operator “OR” and “AND” with the above key words. All relevant systematic reviews, original articles, case series, and case reports were selected for this review. RESULTS: The sensitivity of MRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is between 91%–93%, and the specificity is between 36%–41% in various studies. It also has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%–92% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 51%–52%. The yield of MRI fusion biopsy (MRI-FB) is similar, if not superior to MR cognitive biopsy. In-bore MRI-TB had better detection rates compared to MR cognitive biopsy, but were similar to MR fusion biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRI guidance in prostate biopsy is inevitable, subject to availability, cost, and experience. Any one of the three modalities (i.e. MRI cognitive, MRI fusion and MRI in-bore approach) can be used. MRI-FB has a fine balance with regards to accuracy, practicality and affordability. Second Military Medical University 2021-01 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7859420/ /pubmed/33569277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2020.07.001 Text en © 2021 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh
Samavedi, Srinivas
Moschovas, Marcio Covas
Onol, Fikret Fatih
Roof, Shannon
Rogers, Travis
Patel, Vipul R.
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature
title Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature
title_full Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature
title_short Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—a review of literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2020.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT seetharambhatkultheramesh magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature
AT samavedisrinivas magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature
AT moschovasmarciocovas magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature
AT onolfikretfatih magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature
AT roofshannon magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature
AT rogerstravis magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature
AT patelvipulr magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature
AT sivaramanananthakrishnan magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature