Cargando…
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature
OBJECTIVE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) helps to identify lesion of prostate with reasonable accuracy. We aim to describe the various uses of MP-MRI for prostate biopsy comparing different techniques of MP-MRI guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Second Military Medical University
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2020.07.001 |
_version_ | 1783646729211478016 |
---|---|
author | Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Samavedi, Srinivas Moschovas, Marcio Covas Onol, Fikret Fatih Roof, Shannon Rogers, Travis Patel, Vipul R. Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan |
author_facet | Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Samavedi, Srinivas Moschovas, Marcio Covas Onol, Fikret Fatih Roof, Shannon Rogers, Travis Patel, Vipul R. Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan |
author_sort | Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) helps to identify lesion of prostate with reasonable accuracy. We aim to describe the various uses of MP-MRI for prostate biopsy comparing different techniques of MP-MRI guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed for “multiparametric MRI”, “MRI fusion biopsy”, “MRI guided biopsy”, “prostate biopsy”, “MRI cognitive biopsy”, “MRI fusion biopsy systems”, “prostate biopsy” and “cost analysis”. The search operation was performed using the operator “OR” and “AND” with the above key words. All relevant systematic reviews, original articles, case series, and case reports were selected for this review. RESULTS: The sensitivity of MRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is between 91%–93%, and the specificity is between 36%–41% in various studies. It also has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%–92% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 51%–52%. The yield of MRI fusion biopsy (MRI-FB) is similar, if not superior to MR cognitive biopsy. In-bore MRI-TB had better detection rates compared to MR cognitive biopsy, but were similar to MR fusion biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRI guidance in prostate biopsy is inevitable, subject to availability, cost, and experience. Any one of the three modalities (i.e. MRI cognitive, MRI fusion and MRI in-bore approach) can be used. MRI-FB has a fine balance with regards to accuracy, practicality and affordability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7859420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Second Military Medical University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78594202021-02-09 Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Samavedi, Srinivas Moschovas, Marcio Covas Onol, Fikret Fatih Roof, Shannon Rogers, Travis Patel, Vipul R. Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan Asian J Urol Review OBJECTIVE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) helps to identify lesion of prostate with reasonable accuracy. We aim to describe the various uses of MP-MRI for prostate biopsy comparing different techniques of MP-MRI guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed for “multiparametric MRI”, “MRI fusion biopsy”, “MRI guided biopsy”, “prostate biopsy”, “MRI cognitive biopsy”, “MRI fusion biopsy systems”, “prostate biopsy” and “cost analysis”. The search operation was performed using the operator “OR” and “AND” with the above key words. All relevant systematic reviews, original articles, case series, and case reports were selected for this review. RESULTS: The sensitivity of MRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is between 91%–93%, and the specificity is between 36%–41% in various studies. It also has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%–92% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 51%–52%. The yield of MRI fusion biopsy (MRI-FB) is similar, if not superior to MR cognitive biopsy. In-bore MRI-TB had better detection rates compared to MR cognitive biopsy, but were similar to MR fusion biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRI guidance in prostate biopsy is inevitable, subject to availability, cost, and experience. Any one of the three modalities (i.e. MRI cognitive, MRI fusion and MRI in-bore approach) can be used. MRI-FB has a fine balance with regards to accuracy, practicality and affordability. Second Military Medical University 2021-01 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7859420/ /pubmed/33569277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2020.07.001 Text en © 2021 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Seetharam Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Samavedi, Srinivas Moschovas, Marcio Covas Onol, Fikret Fatih Roof, Shannon Rogers, Travis Patel, Vipul R. Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature |
title_full | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature |
title_fullStr | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature |
title_short | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—A review of literature |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy—a review of literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2020.07.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seetharambhatkultheramesh magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature AT samavedisrinivas magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature AT moschovasmarciocovas magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature AT onolfikretfatih magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature AT roofshannon magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature AT rogerstravis magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature AT patelvipulr magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature AT sivaramanananthakrishnan magneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyareviewofliterature |