Cargando…

The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science

The study of human behavior is severely hampered by logistical problems, ethical and legal constraints, and funding shortfalls. However, the biggest difficulty of conducting social and behavioral research is the extraordinary complexity of the study phenomena. In this article, we review the impact o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanbonmatsu, David M., Cooley, Emily H., Butner, Jonathan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580111
_version_ 1783646743790878720
author Sanbonmatsu, David M.
Cooley, Emily H.
Butner, Jonathan E.
author_facet Sanbonmatsu, David M.
Cooley, Emily H.
Butner, Jonathan E.
author_sort Sanbonmatsu, David M.
collection PubMed
description The study of human behavior is severely hampered by logistical problems, ethical and legal constraints, and funding shortfalls. However, the biggest difficulty of conducting social and behavioral research is the extraordinary complexity of the study phenomena. In this article, we review the impact of complexity on research design, hypothesis testing, measurement, data analyses, reproducibility, and the communication of findings in psychological science. The systematic investigation of the world often requires different approaches because of the variability in complexity. Confirmatory testing, multi-factorial designs, survey methods, large samples, and modeling are frequently needed to study complex social and behavioral topics. Complexity impedes the measurement of general constructs, the reproducibility of results and scientific reporting, and the general rigor of research. Many of the benchmarks established by classic work in physical science are not attainable in studies of more complex phenomena. Consequently, the standards used to evaluate scientific research should be tethered to the complexity of the study topic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78594822021-02-05 The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science Sanbonmatsu, David M. Cooley, Emily H. Butner, Jonathan E. Front Psychol Psychology The study of human behavior is severely hampered by logistical problems, ethical and legal constraints, and funding shortfalls. However, the biggest difficulty of conducting social and behavioral research is the extraordinary complexity of the study phenomena. In this article, we review the impact of complexity on research design, hypothesis testing, measurement, data analyses, reproducibility, and the communication of findings in psychological science. The systematic investigation of the world often requires different approaches because of the variability in complexity. Confirmatory testing, multi-factorial designs, survey methods, large samples, and modeling are frequently needed to study complex social and behavioral topics. Complexity impedes the measurement of general constructs, the reproducibility of results and scientific reporting, and the general rigor of research. Many of the benchmarks established by classic work in physical science are not attainable in studies of more complex phenomena. Consequently, the standards used to evaluate scientific research should be tethered to the complexity of the study topic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7859482/ /pubmed/33551904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580111 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sanbonmatsu, Cooley and Butner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Sanbonmatsu, David M.
Cooley, Emily H.
Butner, Jonathan E.
The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science
title The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science
title_full The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science
title_fullStr The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science
title_short The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science
title_sort impact of complexity on methods and findings in psychological science
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580111
work_keys_str_mv AT sanbonmatsudavidm theimpactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience
AT cooleyemilyh theimpactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience
AT butnerjonathane theimpactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience
AT sanbonmatsudavidm impactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience
AT cooleyemilyh impactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience
AT butnerjonathane impactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience