Cargando…
The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science
The study of human behavior is severely hampered by logistical problems, ethical and legal constraints, and funding shortfalls. However, the biggest difficulty of conducting social and behavioral research is the extraordinary complexity of the study phenomena. In this article, we review the impact o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580111 |
_version_ | 1783646743790878720 |
---|---|
author | Sanbonmatsu, David M. Cooley, Emily H. Butner, Jonathan E. |
author_facet | Sanbonmatsu, David M. Cooley, Emily H. Butner, Jonathan E. |
author_sort | Sanbonmatsu, David M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study of human behavior is severely hampered by logistical problems, ethical and legal constraints, and funding shortfalls. However, the biggest difficulty of conducting social and behavioral research is the extraordinary complexity of the study phenomena. In this article, we review the impact of complexity on research design, hypothesis testing, measurement, data analyses, reproducibility, and the communication of findings in psychological science. The systematic investigation of the world often requires different approaches because of the variability in complexity. Confirmatory testing, multi-factorial designs, survey methods, large samples, and modeling are frequently needed to study complex social and behavioral topics. Complexity impedes the measurement of general constructs, the reproducibility of results and scientific reporting, and the general rigor of research. Many of the benchmarks established by classic work in physical science are not attainable in studies of more complex phenomena. Consequently, the standards used to evaluate scientific research should be tethered to the complexity of the study topic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7859482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78594822021-02-05 The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science Sanbonmatsu, David M. Cooley, Emily H. Butner, Jonathan E. Front Psychol Psychology The study of human behavior is severely hampered by logistical problems, ethical and legal constraints, and funding shortfalls. However, the biggest difficulty of conducting social and behavioral research is the extraordinary complexity of the study phenomena. In this article, we review the impact of complexity on research design, hypothesis testing, measurement, data analyses, reproducibility, and the communication of findings in psychological science. The systematic investigation of the world often requires different approaches because of the variability in complexity. Confirmatory testing, multi-factorial designs, survey methods, large samples, and modeling are frequently needed to study complex social and behavioral topics. Complexity impedes the measurement of general constructs, the reproducibility of results and scientific reporting, and the general rigor of research. Many of the benchmarks established by classic work in physical science are not attainable in studies of more complex phenomena. Consequently, the standards used to evaluate scientific research should be tethered to the complexity of the study topic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7859482/ /pubmed/33551904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580111 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sanbonmatsu, Cooley and Butner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Sanbonmatsu, David M. Cooley, Emily H. Butner, Jonathan E. The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science |
title | The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science |
title_full | The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science |
title_short | The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science |
title_sort | impact of complexity on methods and findings in psychological science |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanbonmatsudavidm theimpactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience AT cooleyemilyh theimpactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience AT butnerjonathane theimpactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience AT sanbonmatsudavidm impactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience AT cooleyemilyh impactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience AT butnerjonathane impactofcomplexityonmethodsandfindingsinpsychologicalscience |