Cargando…

The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora

Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora. Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cada...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanzlik, Shane, Riff, Andrew J., Wuerz, Thomas H., Abdulian, Michael, Gurin, Danielle, Nho, Shane J., Salata, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535
_version_ 1783646780016033792
author Hanzlik, Shane
Riff, Andrew J.
Wuerz, Thomas H.
Abdulian, Michael
Gurin, Danielle
Nho, Shane J.
Salata, Michael J.
author_facet Hanzlik, Shane
Riff, Andrew J.
Wuerz, Thomas H.
Abdulian, Michael
Gurin, Danielle
Nho, Shane J.
Salata, Michael J.
author_sort Hanzlik, Shane
collection PubMed
description Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora. Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity. Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities. Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78596472021-02-05 The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora Hanzlik, Shane Riff, Andrew J. Wuerz, Thomas H. Abdulian, Michael Gurin, Danielle Nho, Shane J. Salata, Michael J. Front Surg Surgery Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora. Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity. Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities. Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7859647/ /pubmed/33553238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hanzlik, Riff, Wuerz, Abdulian, Gurin, Nho and Salata. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Hanzlik, Shane
Riff, Andrew J.
Wuerz, Thomas H.
Abdulian, Michael
Gurin, Danielle
Nho, Shane J.
Salata, Michael J.
The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_full The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_fullStr The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_short The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_sort prevalence of cam morphology: a cross-sectional evaluation of 3,558 cadaveric femora
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535
work_keys_str_mv AT hanzlikshane theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT riffandrewj theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT wuerzthomash theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT abdulianmichael theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT gurindanielle theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT nhoshanej theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT salatamichaelj theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT hanzlikshane prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT riffandrewj prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT wuerzthomash prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT abdulianmichael prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT gurindanielle prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT nhoshanej prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT salatamichaelj prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora