Cargando…
The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora. Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cada...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535 |
_version_ | 1783646780016033792 |
---|---|
author | Hanzlik, Shane Riff, Andrew J. Wuerz, Thomas H. Abdulian, Michael Gurin, Danielle Nho, Shane J. Salata, Michael J. |
author_facet | Hanzlik, Shane Riff, Andrew J. Wuerz, Thomas H. Abdulian, Michael Gurin, Danielle Nho, Shane J. Salata, Michael J. |
author_sort | Hanzlik, Shane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora. Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity. Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities. Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7859647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78596472021-02-05 The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora Hanzlik, Shane Riff, Andrew J. Wuerz, Thomas H. Abdulian, Michael Gurin, Danielle Nho, Shane J. Salata, Michael J. Front Surg Surgery Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora. Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity. Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities. Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7859647/ /pubmed/33553238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hanzlik, Riff, Wuerz, Abdulian, Gurin, Nho and Salata. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Hanzlik, Shane Riff, Andrew J. Wuerz, Thomas H. Abdulian, Michael Gurin, Danielle Nho, Shane J. Salata, Michael J. The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title | The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_full | The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_fullStr | The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_short | The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_sort | prevalence of cam morphology: a cross-sectional evaluation of 3,558 cadaveric femora |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanzlikshane theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT riffandrewj theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT wuerzthomash theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT abdulianmichael theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT gurindanielle theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT nhoshanej theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT salatamichaelj theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT hanzlikshane prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT riffandrewj prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT wuerzthomash prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT abdulianmichael prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT gurindanielle prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT nhoshanej prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT salatamichaelj prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora |