Cargando…

Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) for the reduction of postoperative infection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elective LCC was performed on 529 patients at Jeonbuk National University Hospital between April 2015 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jae Do, Yu, Hee Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33527797
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.2.172
_version_ 1783646787281616896
author Yang, Jae Do
Yu, Hee Chul
author_facet Yang, Jae Do
Yu, Hee Chul
author_sort Yang, Jae Do
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) for the reduction of postoperative infection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elective LCC was performed on 529 patients at Jeonbuk National University Hospital between April 2015 and August 2017. A total of 509 patients were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria. This prospective study compared the results for antibiotic group (AG) (n=249, cefotetan 1 g, 1 dose/prophylactic) and non-antibiotic group (NAG) (n=260). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups: AG and NAG (p=0.580, 0.782, and 0.325, respectively). Levels of C-reactive protein were higher in NAG compared to AG at postoperative day 2 (16.6±24.2 vs. 24.2±40.6; p=0.033). There were no significant differences in white blood cell counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Fever ≥38℃ on postoperative day 2 occurred in 3 (1.2%) and 9 (3%) patients in AG and NAG, respectively. One patient in each group had subhepatic fluid collection by abdominal computed tomography, but there was no evidence of infection. Two patients in NAG (3%) had serous wound drainage on postoperative day 14. CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significant differences in patients receiving or not receiving prophylactic antibiotics during LCC. Therefore, it is not necessary to use prophylactic antibiotics during elective LCC in patients who meet the inclusion criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78596822021-02-11 Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate Yang, Jae Do Yu, Hee Chul Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) for the reduction of postoperative infection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elective LCC was performed on 529 patients at Jeonbuk National University Hospital between April 2015 and August 2017. A total of 509 patients were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria. This prospective study compared the results for antibiotic group (AG) (n=249, cefotetan 1 g, 1 dose/prophylactic) and non-antibiotic group (NAG) (n=260). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups: AG and NAG (p=0.580, 0.782, and 0.325, respectively). Levels of C-reactive protein were higher in NAG compared to AG at postoperative day 2 (16.6±24.2 vs. 24.2±40.6; p=0.033). There were no significant differences in white blood cell counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Fever ≥38℃ on postoperative day 2 occurred in 3 (1.2%) and 9 (3%) patients in AG and NAG, respectively. One patient in each group had subhepatic fluid collection by abdominal computed tomography, but there was no evidence of infection. Two patients in NAG (3%) had serous wound drainage on postoperative day 14. CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significant differences in patients receiving or not receiving prophylactic antibiotics during LCC. Therefore, it is not necessary to use prophylactic antibiotics during elective LCC in patients who meet the inclusion criteria. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2021-02-01 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7859682/ /pubmed/33527797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.2.172 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Jae Do
Yu, Hee Chul
Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate
title Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate
title_full Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate
title_fullStr Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate
title_short Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate
title_sort prospective control study of clinical effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy on infection rate
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33527797
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.2.172
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjaedo prospectivecontrolstudyofclinicaleffectivenessofprophylacticantibioticsinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyoninfectionrate
AT yuheechul prospectivecontrolstudyofclinicaleffectivenessofprophylacticantibioticsinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyoninfectionrate