Cargando…
Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) for the reduction of postoperative infection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elective LCC was performed on 529 patients at Jeonbuk National University Hospital between April 2015 a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Yonsei University College of Medicine
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33527797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.2.172 |
_version_ | 1783646787281616896 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Jae Do Yu, Hee Chul |
author_facet | Yang, Jae Do Yu, Hee Chul |
author_sort | Yang, Jae Do |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) for the reduction of postoperative infection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elective LCC was performed on 529 patients at Jeonbuk National University Hospital between April 2015 and August 2017. A total of 509 patients were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria. This prospective study compared the results for antibiotic group (AG) (n=249, cefotetan 1 g, 1 dose/prophylactic) and non-antibiotic group (NAG) (n=260). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups: AG and NAG (p=0.580, 0.782, and 0.325, respectively). Levels of C-reactive protein were higher in NAG compared to AG at postoperative day 2 (16.6±24.2 vs. 24.2±40.6; p=0.033). There were no significant differences in white blood cell counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Fever ≥38℃ on postoperative day 2 occurred in 3 (1.2%) and 9 (3%) patients in AG and NAG, respectively. One patient in each group had subhepatic fluid collection by abdominal computed tomography, but there was no evidence of infection. Two patients in NAG (3%) had serous wound drainage on postoperative day 14. CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significant differences in patients receiving or not receiving prophylactic antibiotics during LCC. Therefore, it is not necessary to use prophylactic antibiotics during elective LCC in patients who meet the inclusion criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7859682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78596822021-02-11 Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate Yang, Jae Do Yu, Hee Chul Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) for the reduction of postoperative infection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elective LCC was performed on 529 patients at Jeonbuk National University Hospital between April 2015 and August 2017. A total of 509 patients were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria. This prospective study compared the results for antibiotic group (AG) (n=249, cefotetan 1 g, 1 dose/prophylactic) and non-antibiotic group (NAG) (n=260). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups: AG and NAG (p=0.580, 0.782, and 0.325, respectively). Levels of C-reactive protein were higher in NAG compared to AG at postoperative day 2 (16.6±24.2 vs. 24.2±40.6; p=0.033). There were no significant differences in white blood cell counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Fever ≥38℃ on postoperative day 2 occurred in 3 (1.2%) and 9 (3%) patients in AG and NAG, respectively. One patient in each group had subhepatic fluid collection by abdominal computed tomography, but there was no evidence of infection. Two patients in NAG (3%) had serous wound drainage on postoperative day 14. CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significant differences in patients receiving or not receiving prophylactic antibiotics during LCC. Therefore, it is not necessary to use prophylactic antibiotics during elective LCC in patients who meet the inclusion criteria. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2021-02-01 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7859682/ /pubmed/33527797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.2.172 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yang, Jae Do Yu, Hee Chul Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate |
title | Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate |
title_full | Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate |
title_fullStr | Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate |
title_short | Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate |
title_sort | prospective control study of clinical effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy on infection rate |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33527797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.2.172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangjaedo prospectivecontrolstudyofclinicaleffectivenessofprophylacticantibioticsinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyoninfectionrate AT yuheechul prospectivecontrolstudyofclinicaleffectivenessofprophylacticantibioticsinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyoninfectionrate |