Cargando…

Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise

This study examined acute cerebral hemodynamic and circulating neurotrophic factor responses to moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICT), guideline-based high intensity interval exercise (HIIT), and sprint interval exercise (SIT). We hypothesized that the pattern of middle cerebral artery veloc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weaver, Samuel R., Skinner, Bethany D., Furlong, Rhodri, Lucas, Rebekah A. I., Cable, N. Timothy, Rendeiro, Catarina, McGettrick, Helen M., Lucas, Samuel J. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.609935
_version_ 1783646794584948736
author Weaver, Samuel R.
Skinner, Bethany D.
Furlong, Rhodri
Lucas, Rebekah A. I.
Cable, N. Timothy
Rendeiro, Catarina
McGettrick, Helen M.
Lucas, Samuel J. E.
author_facet Weaver, Samuel R.
Skinner, Bethany D.
Furlong, Rhodri
Lucas, Rebekah A. I.
Cable, N. Timothy
Rendeiro, Catarina
McGettrick, Helen M.
Lucas, Samuel J. E.
author_sort Weaver, Samuel R.
collection PubMed
description This study examined acute cerebral hemodynamic and circulating neurotrophic factor responses to moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICT), guideline-based high intensity interval exercise (HIIT), and sprint interval exercise (SIT). We hypothesized that the pattern of middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) response would differ between interval and continuous exercise, with SIT inducing the smallest increase from rest, while increases in neurotrophic factors would be intensity-dependent. In a randomized crossover design, 24 healthy adults (nine females) performed three exercise protocols: (i) MICT (30 min), (ii) HIIT (4 × 4 min at 85% HR(max)), and (iii) SIT (4 × 30 s supramaximal). MCAv significantly increased from rest across MICT (Δ13.1 ± 8.5 cm⋅s(–1), p < 0.001) and all bouts of HIIT (Δ15.2 ± 9.8 cm⋅s(–1), p < 0.001), but only for the initial bout of SIT (Δ17.3 ± 11.6 cm⋅s(–1), p < 0.001). Immediately following each interval bout, MCAv increased (i.e., rebounded) for the SIT (9–14% above rest, p ≤ 0.04), but not HIIT protocol. SIT alone induced significant elevations from rest to end-exercise in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; Δ28 ± 36%, p = 0.017) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, Δ149% ± 162%, p < 0.001) and there were greater increases in lactate than in either other protocol (>5-fold greater in SIT, p < 0.001), alongside a small significant reduction at the end of active recovery in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1, Δ22 ± 21%, p = 0.002). In conclusion, while the nature of the response may differ, both guideline-based and sprint-based interval exercise have the potential to induce significant changes in factors linked to improved cerebrovascular and brain health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78597142021-02-05 Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise Weaver, Samuel R. Skinner, Bethany D. Furlong, Rhodri Lucas, Rebekah A. I. Cable, N. Timothy Rendeiro, Catarina McGettrick, Helen M. Lucas, Samuel J. E. Front Physiol Physiology This study examined acute cerebral hemodynamic and circulating neurotrophic factor responses to moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICT), guideline-based high intensity interval exercise (HIIT), and sprint interval exercise (SIT). We hypothesized that the pattern of middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) response would differ between interval and continuous exercise, with SIT inducing the smallest increase from rest, while increases in neurotrophic factors would be intensity-dependent. In a randomized crossover design, 24 healthy adults (nine females) performed three exercise protocols: (i) MICT (30 min), (ii) HIIT (4 × 4 min at 85% HR(max)), and (iii) SIT (4 × 30 s supramaximal). MCAv significantly increased from rest across MICT (Δ13.1 ± 8.5 cm⋅s(–1), p < 0.001) and all bouts of HIIT (Δ15.2 ± 9.8 cm⋅s(–1), p < 0.001), but only for the initial bout of SIT (Δ17.3 ± 11.6 cm⋅s(–1), p < 0.001). Immediately following each interval bout, MCAv increased (i.e., rebounded) for the SIT (9–14% above rest, p ≤ 0.04), but not HIIT protocol. SIT alone induced significant elevations from rest to end-exercise in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; Δ28 ± 36%, p = 0.017) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, Δ149% ± 162%, p < 0.001) and there were greater increases in lactate than in either other protocol (>5-fold greater in SIT, p < 0.001), alongside a small significant reduction at the end of active recovery in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1, Δ22 ± 21%, p = 0.002). In conclusion, while the nature of the response may differ, both guideline-based and sprint-based interval exercise have the potential to induce significant changes in factors linked to improved cerebrovascular and brain health. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7859714/ /pubmed/33551835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.609935 Text en Copyright © 2021 Weaver, Skinner, Furlong, Lucas, Cable, Rendeiro, McGettrick and Lucas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Weaver, Samuel R.
Skinner, Bethany D.
Furlong, Rhodri
Lucas, Rebekah A. I.
Cable, N. Timothy
Rendeiro, Catarina
McGettrick, Helen M.
Lucas, Samuel J. E.
Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise
title Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise
title_full Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise
title_fullStr Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise
title_full_unstemmed Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise
title_short Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise
title_sort cerebral hemodynamic and neurotrophic factor responses are dependent on the type of exercise
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.609935
work_keys_str_mv AT weaversamuelr cerebralhemodynamicandneurotrophicfactorresponsesaredependentonthetypeofexercise
AT skinnerbethanyd cerebralhemodynamicandneurotrophicfactorresponsesaredependentonthetypeofexercise
AT furlongrhodri cerebralhemodynamicandneurotrophicfactorresponsesaredependentonthetypeofexercise
AT lucasrebekahai cerebralhemodynamicandneurotrophicfactorresponsesaredependentonthetypeofexercise
AT cablentimothy cerebralhemodynamicandneurotrophicfactorresponsesaredependentonthetypeofexercise
AT rendeirocatarina cerebralhemodynamicandneurotrophicfactorresponsesaredependentonthetypeofexercise
AT mcgettrickhelenm cerebralhemodynamicandneurotrophicfactorresponsesaredependentonthetypeofexercise
AT lucassamuelje cerebralhemodynamicandneurotrophicfactorresponsesaredependentonthetypeofexercise