Cargando…
The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
The advent and widespread adoption of pedicle screw instrumentation prompted the need for image guidance in spine surgery to improve accuracy and safety. Although the conventional method, fluoroscopy, is readily available and inexpensive, concerns regarding radiation exposure and the drive to provid...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553379 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07 |
_version_ | 1783646803028082688 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Meng Tetreault, Tyler A. Vaishnav, Avani York, Philip J. Staub, Blake N. |
author_facet | Huang, Meng Tetreault, Tyler A. Vaishnav, Avani York, Philip J. Staub, Blake N. |
author_sort | Huang, Meng |
collection | PubMed |
description | The advent and widespread adoption of pedicle screw instrumentation prompted the need for image guidance in spine surgery to improve accuracy and safety. Although the conventional method, fluoroscopy, is readily available and inexpensive, concerns regarding radiation exposure and the drive to provide better visual guidance spurred the development of computer-assisted navigation. Contemporaneously, a non-navigated robotic guidance platform was also introduced as a competing modality for pedicle screw placement. Although the robot could provide high precision trajectory guidance by restricting four of the six degrees of freedom (DOF), the lack of real-time depth control and high capital acquisition cost diminished its popularity, while computer-assisted navigation platforms became increasingly sophisticated and accepted. The recent integration of real-time 3D navigation with robotic platforms has resulted in a resurgence of interest in robotics in spine surgery with the recent introduction of numerous navigated robotic platforms. The currently available navigated robotic spine surgery platforms include the ROSA Spine Robot (Zimmer Biomet Robotics formerly Medtech SA, Montpellier, France), ExcelsiusGPS(®) (Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA), Mazor X spine robot (Medtronic Navigation Louisville, CO; Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN; formerly Mazor Robotics, Caesarea, Israel) and TiRobot (TINAVI Medical Technologies, Beijing, China). Here we provide an overview of these navigated spine robotic platforms, existing applications, and potential future avenues of implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7859750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78597502021-02-05 The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery Huang, Meng Tetreault, Tyler A. Vaishnav, Avani York, Philip J. Staub, Blake N. Ann Transl Med Review Article on Current State of Intraoperative Imaging The advent and widespread adoption of pedicle screw instrumentation prompted the need for image guidance in spine surgery to improve accuracy and safety. Although the conventional method, fluoroscopy, is readily available and inexpensive, concerns regarding radiation exposure and the drive to provide better visual guidance spurred the development of computer-assisted navigation. Contemporaneously, a non-navigated robotic guidance platform was also introduced as a competing modality for pedicle screw placement. Although the robot could provide high precision trajectory guidance by restricting four of the six degrees of freedom (DOF), the lack of real-time depth control and high capital acquisition cost diminished its popularity, while computer-assisted navigation platforms became increasingly sophisticated and accepted. The recent integration of real-time 3D navigation with robotic platforms has resulted in a resurgence of interest in robotics in spine surgery with the recent introduction of numerous navigated robotic platforms. The currently available navigated robotic spine surgery platforms include the ROSA Spine Robot (Zimmer Biomet Robotics formerly Medtech SA, Montpellier, France), ExcelsiusGPS(®) (Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA), Mazor X spine robot (Medtronic Navigation Louisville, CO; Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN; formerly Mazor Robotics, Caesarea, Israel) and TiRobot (TINAVI Medical Technologies, Beijing, China). Here we provide an overview of these navigated spine robotic platforms, existing applications, and potential future avenues of implementation. AME Publishing Company 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7859750/ /pubmed/33553379 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Current State of Intraoperative Imaging Huang, Meng Tetreault, Tyler A. Vaishnav, Avani York, Philip J. Staub, Blake N. The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery |
title | The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery |
title_full | The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery |
title_fullStr | The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery |
title_short | The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery |
title_sort | current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery |
topic | Review Article on Current State of Intraoperative Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553379 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangmeng thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT tetreaulttylera thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT vaishnavavani thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT yorkphilipj thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT staubblaken thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT huangmeng currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT tetreaulttylera currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT vaishnavavani currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT yorkphilipj currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery AT staubblaken currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery |