Cargando…

The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery

The advent and widespread adoption of pedicle screw instrumentation prompted the need for image guidance in spine surgery to improve accuracy and safety. Although the conventional method, fluoroscopy, is readily available and inexpensive, concerns regarding radiation exposure and the drive to provid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Meng, Tetreault, Tyler A., Vaishnav, Avani, York, Philip J., Staub, Blake N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553379
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07
_version_ 1783646803028082688
author Huang, Meng
Tetreault, Tyler A.
Vaishnav, Avani
York, Philip J.
Staub, Blake N.
author_facet Huang, Meng
Tetreault, Tyler A.
Vaishnav, Avani
York, Philip J.
Staub, Blake N.
author_sort Huang, Meng
collection PubMed
description The advent and widespread adoption of pedicle screw instrumentation prompted the need for image guidance in spine surgery to improve accuracy and safety. Although the conventional method, fluoroscopy, is readily available and inexpensive, concerns regarding radiation exposure and the drive to provide better visual guidance spurred the development of computer-assisted navigation. Contemporaneously, a non-navigated robotic guidance platform was also introduced as a competing modality for pedicle screw placement. Although the robot could provide high precision trajectory guidance by restricting four of the six degrees of freedom (DOF), the lack of real-time depth control and high capital acquisition cost diminished its popularity, while computer-assisted navigation platforms became increasingly sophisticated and accepted. The recent integration of real-time 3D navigation with robotic platforms has resulted in a resurgence of interest in robotics in spine surgery with the recent introduction of numerous navigated robotic platforms. The currently available navigated robotic spine surgery platforms include the ROSA Spine Robot (Zimmer Biomet Robotics formerly Medtech SA, Montpellier, France), ExcelsiusGPS(®) (Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA), Mazor X spine robot (Medtronic Navigation Louisville, CO; Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN; formerly Mazor Robotics, Caesarea, Israel) and TiRobot (TINAVI Medical Technologies, Beijing, China). Here we provide an overview of these navigated spine robotic platforms, existing applications, and potential future avenues of implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78597502021-02-05 The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery Huang, Meng Tetreault, Tyler A. Vaishnav, Avani York, Philip J. Staub, Blake N. Ann Transl Med Review Article on Current State of Intraoperative Imaging The advent and widespread adoption of pedicle screw instrumentation prompted the need for image guidance in spine surgery to improve accuracy and safety. Although the conventional method, fluoroscopy, is readily available and inexpensive, concerns regarding radiation exposure and the drive to provide better visual guidance spurred the development of computer-assisted navigation. Contemporaneously, a non-navigated robotic guidance platform was also introduced as a competing modality for pedicle screw placement. Although the robot could provide high precision trajectory guidance by restricting four of the six degrees of freedom (DOF), the lack of real-time depth control and high capital acquisition cost diminished its popularity, while computer-assisted navigation platforms became increasingly sophisticated and accepted. The recent integration of real-time 3D navigation with robotic platforms has resulted in a resurgence of interest in robotics in spine surgery with the recent introduction of numerous navigated robotic platforms. The currently available navigated robotic spine surgery platforms include the ROSA Spine Robot (Zimmer Biomet Robotics formerly Medtech SA, Montpellier, France), ExcelsiusGPS(®) (Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA), Mazor X spine robot (Medtronic Navigation Louisville, CO; Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN; formerly Mazor Robotics, Caesarea, Israel) and TiRobot (TINAVI Medical Technologies, Beijing, China). Here we provide an overview of these navigated spine robotic platforms, existing applications, and potential future avenues of implementation. AME Publishing Company 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7859750/ /pubmed/33553379 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Current State of Intraoperative Imaging
Huang, Meng
Tetreault, Tyler A.
Vaishnav, Avani
York, Philip J.
Staub, Blake N.
The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
title The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
title_full The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
title_fullStr The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
title_full_unstemmed The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
title_short The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
title_sort current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery
topic Review Article on Current State of Intraoperative Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553379
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07
work_keys_str_mv AT huangmeng thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT tetreaulttylera thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT vaishnavavani thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT yorkphilipj thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT staubblaken thecurrentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT huangmeng currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT tetreaulttylera currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT vaishnavavani currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT yorkphilipj currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery
AT staubblaken currentstateofnavigationinroboticspinesurgery