Cargando…
The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis
BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) is critical procedure in the diagnosis interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The procedure utilizes cryoprobes of different sizes (1.9-mm or 2.4-mm probes). This study aimed to compare the effect of different cryoprobe types on the outcomes of TBCB. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553313 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4159 |
_version_ | 1783646804949073920 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Guowu Ren, Yanhong Li, Jun Yang, Ting Su, Nan Zhao, Ling Wang, Shumeng Wang, Dan Li, Ying Tian, Zheng Liu, Ruihong Dai, Huaping Wang, Chen |
author_facet | Zhou, Guowu Ren, Yanhong Li, Jun Yang, Ting Su, Nan Zhao, Ling Wang, Shumeng Wang, Dan Li, Ying Tian, Zheng Liu, Ruihong Dai, Huaping Wang, Chen |
author_sort | Zhou, Guowu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) is critical procedure in the diagnosis interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The procedure utilizes cryoprobes of different sizes (1.9-mm or 2.4-mm probes). This study aimed to compare the effect of different cryoprobe types on the outcomes of TBCB. METHODS: This study was analyzed from an updated single-center prospective cohort study between September 2018 and January 2020 (NCT04047667). TBCB was performed in patients with ILD using 1.9-mm or 2.4-mm cryoprobes. The size and quality of specimens, complications, and histopathological and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnoses were compared between the cryoprobes. RESULTS: TBCB was performed on 52 and 164 patients with 1.9- and 2.4-mm cryoprobes, respectively. The specimens obtained using the 2.4-mm probe were significantly larger than those obtained with the 1.9-mm probe (surface area: 24.6 vs. 22.0 mm(2), P<0.001). Both percentages of grossly and microscopically qualified specimens acquired with the 2.4-mm probe were significantly higher than those obtained with the 1.9-mm probe (grossly qualified: 80.1% vs. 66.7%, P<0.001; microscopically qualified: 99.4% vs. 90.4%, P=0.003). No significant differences were found in the incidence of pneumothorax (3.7% vs. 0.0%, P=0.360) or the risk of moderate bleeding (9.1% vs. 11.5%, P=0.612) between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the pathological or MDD diagnostic yields. Multivariate analysis indicated that pathological diagnostic yield in patients with microscopically qualified specimens was significantly higher than that with unqualified specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens obtained using the 2.4-mm probe were of significantly better size and quality than those obtained using the 1.9-mm probe. No significant differences were observed between the two probes with respect to the safety profile and diagnostic yield. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7859758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78597582021-02-05 The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis Zhou, Guowu Ren, Yanhong Li, Jun Yang, Ting Su, Nan Zhao, Ling Wang, Shumeng Wang, Dan Li, Ying Tian, Zheng Liu, Ruihong Dai, Huaping Wang, Chen Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) is critical procedure in the diagnosis interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The procedure utilizes cryoprobes of different sizes (1.9-mm or 2.4-mm probes). This study aimed to compare the effect of different cryoprobe types on the outcomes of TBCB. METHODS: This study was analyzed from an updated single-center prospective cohort study between September 2018 and January 2020 (NCT04047667). TBCB was performed in patients with ILD using 1.9-mm or 2.4-mm cryoprobes. The size and quality of specimens, complications, and histopathological and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnoses were compared between the cryoprobes. RESULTS: TBCB was performed on 52 and 164 patients with 1.9- and 2.4-mm cryoprobes, respectively. The specimens obtained using the 2.4-mm probe were significantly larger than those obtained with the 1.9-mm probe (surface area: 24.6 vs. 22.0 mm(2), P<0.001). Both percentages of grossly and microscopically qualified specimens acquired with the 2.4-mm probe were significantly higher than those obtained with the 1.9-mm probe (grossly qualified: 80.1% vs. 66.7%, P<0.001; microscopically qualified: 99.4% vs. 90.4%, P=0.003). No significant differences were found in the incidence of pneumothorax (3.7% vs. 0.0%, P=0.360) or the risk of moderate bleeding (9.1% vs. 11.5%, P=0.612) between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the pathological or MDD diagnostic yields. Multivariate analysis indicated that pathological diagnostic yield in patients with microscopically qualified specimens was significantly higher than that with unqualified specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens obtained using the 2.4-mm probe were of significantly better size and quality than those obtained using the 1.9-mm probe. No significant differences were observed between the two probes with respect to the safety profile and diagnostic yield. AME Publishing Company 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7859758/ /pubmed/33553313 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4159 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhou, Guowu Ren, Yanhong Li, Jun Yang, Ting Su, Nan Zhao, Ling Wang, Shumeng Wang, Dan Li, Ying Tian, Zheng Liu, Ruihong Dai, Huaping Wang, Chen The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis |
title | The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis |
title_full | The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis |
title_fullStr | The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis |
title_short | The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis |
title_sort | effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553313 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouguowu theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT renyanhong theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT lijun theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT yangting theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT sunan theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT zhaoling theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT wangshumeng theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT wangdan theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT liying theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT tianzheng theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT liuruihong theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT daihuaping theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT wangchen theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT zhouguowu effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT renyanhong effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT lijun effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT yangting effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT sunan effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT zhaoling effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT wangshumeng effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT wangdan effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT liying effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT tianzheng effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT liuruihong effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT daihuaping effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis AT wangchen effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis |