Cargando…

The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) is critical procedure in the diagnosis interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The procedure utilizes cryoprobes of different sizes (1.9-mm or 2.4-mm probes). This study aimed to compare the effect of different cryoprobe types on the outcomes of TBCB. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Guowu, Ren, Yanhong, Li, Jun, Yang, Ting, Su, Nan, Zhao, Ling, Wang, Shumeng, Wang, Dan, Li, Ying, Tian, Zheng, Liu, Ruihong, Dai, Huaping, Wang, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553313
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4159
_version_ 1783646804949073920
author Zhou, Guowu
Ren, Yanhong
Li, Jun
Yang, Ting
Su, Nan
Zhao, Ling
Wang, Shumeng
Wang, Dan
Li, Ying
Tian, Zheng
Liu, Ruihong
Dai, Huaping
Wang, Chen
author_facet Zhou, Guowu
Ren, Yanhong
Li, Jun
Yang, Ting
Su, Nan
Zhao, Ling
Wang, Shumeng
Wang, Dan
Li, Ying
Tian, Zheng
Liu, Ruihong
Dai, Huaping
Wang, Chen
author_sort Zhou, Guowu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) is critical procedure in the diagnosis interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The procedure utilizes cryoprobes of different sizes (1.9-mm or 2.4-mm probes). This study aimed to compare the effect of different cryoprobe types on the outcomes of TBCB. METHODS: This study was analyzed from an updated single-center prospective cohort study between September 2018 and January 2020 (NCT04047667). TBCB was performed in patients with ILD using 1.9-mm or 2.4-mm cryoprobes. The size and quality of specimens, complications, and histopathological and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnoses were compared between the cryoprobes. RESULTS: TBCB was performed on 52 and 164 patients with 1.9- and 2.4-mm cryoprobes, respectively. The specimens obtained using the 2.4-mm probe were significantly larger than those obtained with the 1.9-mm probe (surface area: 24.6 vs. 22.0 mm(2), P<0.001). Both percentages of grossly and microscopically qualified specimens acquired with the 2.4-mm probe were significantly higher than those obtained with the 1.9-mm probe (grossly qualified: 80.1% vs. 66.7%, P<0.001; microscopically qualified: 99.4% vs. 90.4%, P=0.003). No significant differences were found in the incidence of pneumothorax (3.7% vs. 0.0%, P=0.360) or the risk of moderate bleeding (9.1% vs. 11.5%, P=0.612) between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the pathological or MDD diagnostic yields. Multivariate analysis indicated that pathological diagnostic yield in patients with microscopically qualified specimens was significantly higher than that with unqualified specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens obtained using the 2.4-mm probe were of significantly better size and quality than those obtained using the 1.9-mm probe. No significant differences were observed between the two probes with respect to the safety profile and diagnostic yield.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78597582021-02-05 The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis Zhou, Guowu Ren, Yanhong Li, Jun Yang, Ting Su, Nan Zhao, Ling Wang, Shumeng Wang, Dan Li, Ying Tian, Zheng Liu, Ruihong Dai, Huaping Wang, Chen Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) is critical procedure in the diagnosis interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The procedure utilizes cryoprobes of different sizes (1.9-mm or 2.4-mm probes). This study aimed to compare the effect of different cryoprobe types on the outcomes of TBCB. METHODS: This study was analyzed from an updated single-center prospective cohort study between September 2018 and January 2020 (NCT04047667). TBCB was performed in patients with ILD using 1.9-mm or 2.4-mm cryoprobes. The size and quality of specimens, complications, and histopathological and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnoses were compared between the cryoprobes. RESULTS: TBCB was performed on 52 and 164 patients with 1.9- and 2.4-mm cryoprobes, respectively. The specimens obtained using the 2.4-mm probe were significantly larger than those obtained with the 1.9-mm probe (surface area: 24.6 vs. 22.0 mm(2), P<0.001). Both percentages of grossly and microscopically qualified specimens acquired with the 2.4-mm probe were significantly higher than those obtained with the 1.9-mm probe (grossly qualified: 80.1% vs. 66.7%, P<0.001; microscopically qualified: 99.4% vs. 90.4%, P=0.003). No significant differences were found in the incidence of pneumothorax (3.7% vs. 0.0%, P=0.360) or the risk of moderate bleeding (9.1% vs. 11.5%, P=0.612) between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the pathological or MDD diagnostic yields. Multivariate analysis indicated that pathological diagnostic yield in patients with microscopically qualified specimens was significantly higher than that with unqualified specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens obtained using the 2.4-mm probe were of significantly better size and quality than those obtained using the 1.9-mm probe. No significant differences were observed between the two probes with respect to the safety profile and diagnostic yield. AME Publishing Company 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7859758/ /pubmed/33553313 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4159 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhou, Guowu
Ren, Yanhong
Li, Jun
Yang, Ting
Su, Nan
Zhao, Ling
Wang, Shumeng
Wang, Dan
Li, Ying
Tian, Zheng
Liu, Ruihong
Dai, Huaping
Wang, Chen
The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis
title The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis
title_full The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis
title_fullStr The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis
title_short The effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis
title_sort effect of 1.9-mm versus 2.4-mm probes in transbronchial cryobiopsies for interstitial lung diseases: a prospective analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553313
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4159
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouguowu theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT renyanhong theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT lijun theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT yangting theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT sunan theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT zhaoling theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT wangshumeng theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT wangdan theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT liying theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT tianzheng theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT liuruihong theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT daihuaping theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT wangchen theeffectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT zhouguowu effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT renyanhong effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT lijun effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT yangting effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT sunan effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT zhaoling effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT wangshumeng effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT wangdan effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT liying effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT tianzheng effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT liuruihong effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT daihuaping effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis
AT wangchen effectof19mmversus24mmprobesintransbronchialcryobiopsiesforinterstitiallungdiseasesaprospectiveanalysis