Cargando…
What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?
BACKGROUND: The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553300 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4289 |
_version_ | 1783646810844168192 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Qichen Li, Xingchen Zhao, Jianjun Bi, Xinyu Li, Zhiyu Huang, Zhen Zhang, Yefan Zhou, Jianguo Zhao, Hong Cai, Jianqiang |
author_facet | Chen, Qichen Li, Xingchen Zhao, Jianjun Bi, Xinyu Li, Zhiyu Huang, Zhen Zhang, Yefan Zhou, Jianguo Zhao, Hong Cai, Jianqiang |
author_sort | Chen, Qichen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study. X-tile analysis was implemented to investigate the optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox risk regression models were used to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles was 5. There were no significant differences in R0 resection, pathological response or postoperative complications between the groups with a low number of NAC cycles group (≤5 cycles, n=80) and high number of NAC cycles (>5 cycles, n=49). Patients with a high number of NAC cycles were more likely to have NAC toxicity than those with a low number of cycles (87.8% vs. 65.0%, P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =1.808, 95% CI: 1.205–2.712, P=0.004) and reduced OS (HR =1.723, 95% CI: 1.041–2.851, P=0.034). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had a better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and better OS (P=0.018, mOS: 57.7 months vs. 41.0 months) than those with a high number of cycles. After 1:1 propensity matching (34 cases vs. 34 cases), multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =2.265, 95% CI: 1.281–4.007, P=0.005) and reduced OS (HR =2.813, 95% CI: 1.359–5.822, P=0.005). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 17.5 vs. 5.6 months) and better OS (P=0.008, mOS: 59.0 vs. 31.8 months) than those with a high number of cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 5 NAC cycles was optimal for biologically resectable CLOM patients. Giving more than 5 NAC cycles was unnecessary because a higher number of NAC cycles has more unfavourable survival and higher NAC toxicities, while leading to similar R0 resection rates and pathological responses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7859783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78597832021-02-05 What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? Chen, Qichen Li, Xingchen Zhao, Jianjun Bi, Xinyu Li, Zhiyu Huang, Zhen Zhang, Yefan Zhou, Jianguo Zhao, Hong Cai, Jianqiang Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study. X-tile analysis was implemented to investigate the optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox risk regression models were used to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles was 5. There were no significant differences in R0 resection, pathological response or postoperative complications between the groups with a low number of NAC cycles group (≤5 cycles, n=80) and high number of NAC cycles (>5 cycles, n=49). Patients with a high number of NAC cycles were more likely to have NAC toxicity than those with a low number of cycles (87.8% vs. 65.0%, P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =1.808, 95% CI: 1.205–2.712, P=0.004) and reduced OS (HR =1.723, 95% CI: 1.041–2.851, P=0.034). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had a better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and better OS (P=0.018, mOS: 57.7 months vs. 41.0 months) than those with a high number of cycles. After 1:1 propensity matching (34 cases vs. 34 cases), multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =2.265, 95% CI: 1.281–4.007, P=0.005) and reduced OS (HR =2.813, 95% CI: 1.359–5.822, P=0.005). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 17.5 vs. 5.6 months) and better OS (P=0.008, mOS: 59.0 vs. 31.8 months) than those with a high number of cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 5 NAC cycles was optimal for biologically resectable CLOM patients. Giving more than 5 NAC cycles was unnecessary because a higher number of NAC cycles has more unfavourable survival and higher NAC toxicities, while leading to similar R0 resection rates and pathological responses. AME Publishing Company 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7859783/ /pubmed/33553300 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4289 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chen, Qichen Li, Xingchen Zhao, Jianjun Bi, Xinyu Li, Zhiyu Huang, Zhen Zhang, Yefan Zhou, Jianguo Zhao, Hong Cai, Jianqiang What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? |
title | What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? |
title_full | What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? |
title_fullStr | What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? |
title_short | What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? |
title_sort | what is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553300 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenqichen whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT lixingchen whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT zhaojianjun whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT bixinyu whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT lizhiyu whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT huangzhen whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT zhangyefan whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT zhoujianguo whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT zhaohong whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases AT caijianqiang whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases |