Cargando…

What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?

BACKGROUND: The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Qichen, Li, Xingchen, Zhao, Jianjun, Bi, Xinyu, Li, Zhiyu, Huang, Zhen, Zhang, Yefan, Zhou, Jianguo, Zhao, Hong, Cai, Jianqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553300
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4289
_version_ 1783646810844168192
author Chen, Qichen
Li, Xingchen
Zhao, Jianjun
Bi, Xinyu
Li, Zhiyu
Huang, Zhen
Zhang, Yefan
Zhou, Jianguo
Zhao, Hong
Cai, Jianqiang
author_facet Chen, Qichen
Li, Xingchen
Zhao, Jianjun
Bi, Xinyu
Li, Zhiyu
Huang, Zhen
Zhang, Yefan
Zhou, Jianguo
Zhao, Hong
Cai, Jianqiang
author_sort Chen, Qichen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study. X-tile analysis was implemented to investigate the optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox risk regression models were used to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles was 5. There were no significant differences in R0 resection, pathological response or postoperative complications between the groups with a low number of NAC cycles group (≤5 cycles, n=80) and high number of NAC cycles (>5 cycles, n=49). Patients with a high number of NAC cycles were more likely to have NAC toxicity than those with a low number of cycles (87.8% vs. 65.0%, P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =1.808, 95% CI: 1.205–2.712, P=0.004) and reduced OS (HR =1.723, 95% CI: 1.041–2.851, P=0.034). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had a better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and better OS (P=0.018, mOS: 57.7 months vs. 41.0 months) than those with a high number of cycles. After 1:1 propensity matching (34 cases vs. 34 cases), multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =2.265, 95% CI: 1.281–4.007, P=0.005) and reduced OS (HR =2.813, 95% CI: 1.359–5.822, P=0.005). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 17.5 vs. 5.6 months) and better OS (P=0.008, mOS: 59.0 vs. 31.8 months) than those with a high number of cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 5 NAC cycles was optimal for biologically resectable CLOM patients. Giving more than 5 NAC cycles was unnecessary because a higher number of NAC cycles has more unfavourable survival and higher NAC toxicities, while leading to similar R0 resection rates and pathological responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78597832021-02-05 What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? Chen, Qichen Li, Xingchen Zhao, Jianjun Bi, Xinyu Li, Zhiyu Huang, Zhen Zhang, Yefan Zhou, Jianguo Zhao, Hong Cai, Jianqiang Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study. X-tile analysis was implemented to investigate the optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox risk regression models were used to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles was 5. There were no significant differences in R0 resection, pathological response or postoperative complications between the groups with a low number of NAC cycles group (≤5 cycles, n=80) and high number of NAC cycles (>5 cycles, n=49). Patients with a high number of NAC cycles were more likely to have NAC toxicity than those with a low number of cycles (87.8% vs. 65.0%, P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =1.808, 95% CI: 1.205–2.712, P=0.004) and reduced OS (HR =1.723, 95% CI: 1.041–2.851, P=0.034). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had a better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and better OS (P=0.018, mOS: 57.7 months vs. 41.0 months) than those with a high number of cycles. After 1:1 propensity matching (34 cases vs. 34 cases), multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =2.265, 95% CI: 1.281–4.007, P=0.005) and reduced OS (HR =2.813, 95% CI: 1.359–5.822, P=0.005). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 17.5 vs. 5.6 months) and better OS (P=0.008, mOS: 59.0 vs. 31.8 months) than those with a high number of cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 5 NAC cycles was optimal for biologically resectable CLOM patients. Giving more than 5 NAC cycles was unnecessary because a higher number of NAC cycles has more unfavourable survival and higher NAC toxicities, while leading to similar R0 resection rates and pathological responses. AME Publishing Company 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7859783/ /pubmed/33553300 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4289 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Qichen
Li, Xingchen
Zhao, Jianjun
Bi, Xinyu
Li, Zhiyu
Huang, Zhen
Zhang, Yefan
Zhou, Jianguo
Zhao, Hong
Cai, Jianqiang
What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?
title What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?
title_full What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?
title_fullStr What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?
title_full_unstemmed What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?
title_short What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?
title_sort what is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553300
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4289
work_keys_str_mv AT chenqichen whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT lixingchen whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT zhaojianjun whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT bixinyu whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT lizhiyu whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT huangzhen whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT zhangyefan whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT zhoujianguo whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT zhaohong whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases
AT caijianqiang whatistheoptimalnumberofneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesforresectablecolorectalliveroligometastases