Cargando…

Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To validate the previously derived Canadian TIA Score to stratify subsequent stroke risk in a new cohort of emergency department patients with transient ischaemic attack. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 13 Canadian emergency departments over five years. PARTICIPANTS: 7607 conse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perry, Jeffrey J, Sivilotti, Marco L A, Émond, Marcel, Stiell, Ian G, Stotts, Grant, Lee, Jacques, Worster, Andrew, Morris, Judy, Cheung, Ka Wai, Jin, Albert Y, Oczkowski, Wieslaw J, Sahlas, Demetrios J, Murray, Heather E, Mackey, Ariane, Verreault, Steve, Camden, Marie-Christine, Yip, Samuel, Teal, Philip, Gladstone, David J, Boulos, Mark I, Chagnon, Nicolas, Shouldice, Elizabeth, Atzema, Clare, Slaoui, Tarik, Teitlebaum, Jeanne, Abdulaziz, Kasim E, Nemnom, Marie-Joe, Wells, George A, Sharma, Mukul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33541890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n49
_version_ 1783646822872383488
author Perry, Jeffrey J
Sivilotti, Marco L A
Émond, Marcel
Stiell, Ian G
Stotts, Grant
Lee, Jacques
Worster, Andrew
Morris, Judy
Cheung, Ka Wai
Jin, Albert Y
Oczkowski, Wieslaw J
Sahlas, Demetrios J
Murray, Heather E
Mackey, Ariane
Verreault, Steve
Camden, Marie-Christine
Yip, Samuel
Teal, Philip
Gladstone, David J
Boulos, Mark I
Chagnon, Nicolas
Shouldice, Elizabeth
Atzema, Clare
Slaoui, Tarik
Teitlebaum, Jeanne
Abdulaziz, Kasim E
Nemnom, Marie-Joe
Wells, George A
Sharma, Mukul
author_facet Perry, Jeffrey J
Sivilotti, Marco L A
Émond, Marcel
Stiell, Ian G
Stotts, Grant
Lee, Jacques
Worster, Andrew
Morris, Judy
Cheung, Ka Wai
Jin, Albert Y
Oczkowski, Wieslaw J
Sahlas, Demetrios J
Murray, Heather E
Mackey, Ariane
Verreault, Steve
Camden, Marie-Christine
Yip, Samuel
Teal, Philip
Gladstone, David J
Boulos, Mark I
Chagnon, Nicolas
Shouldice, Elizabeth
Atzema, Clare
Slaoui, Tarik
Teitlebaum, Jeanne
Abdulaziz, Kasim E
Nemnom, Marie-Joe
Wells, George A
Sharma, Mukul
author_sort Perry, Jeffrey J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate the previously derived Canadian TIA Score to stratify subsequent stroke risk in a new cohort of emergency department patients with transient ischaemic attack. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 13 Canadian emergency departments over five years. PARTICIPANTS: 7607 consecutively enrolled adult patients attending the emergency department with transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was subsequent stroke or carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days. The secondary outcome was subsequent stroke within seven days (with or without carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting). Telephone follow-up used the validated Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke Free Status at seven and 90 days. All outcomes were adjudicated by panels of three stroke experts, blinded to the index emergency department visit. RESULTS: Of the 7607 patients, 108 (1.4%) had a subsequent stroke within seven days, 83 (1.1%) had carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days, and nine had both. The Canadian TIA Score stratified the risk of stroke, carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting, or both within seven days as low (risk ≤0.5%; interval likelihood ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.44), medium (risk 2.3%; interval likelihood ratio 0.94, 0.85 to 1.04), and high (risk 5.9% interval likelihood ratio 2.56, 2.02 to 3.25) more accurately (area under the curve 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.73) than did the ABCD2 (0.60, 0.55 to 0.64) or ABCD2i (0.64, 0.59 to 0.68). Results were similar for subsequent stroke regardless of carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days. CONCLUSION: The Canadian TIA Score stratifies patients’ seven day risk for stroke, with or without carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting, and is now ready for clinical use. Incorporating this validated risk estimate into management plans should improve early decision making at the index emergency visit regarding benefits of hospital admission, timing of investigations, and prioritisation of specialist referral.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7859838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78598382021-02-11 Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study Perry, Jeffrey J Sivilotti, Marco L A Émond, Marcel Stiell, Ian G Stotts, Grant Lee, Jacques Worster, Andrew Morris, Judy Cheung, Ka Wai Jin, Albert Y Oczkowski, Wieslaw J Sahlas, Demetrios J Murray, Heather E Mackey, Ariane Verreault, Steve Camden, Marie-Christine Yip, Samuel Teal, Philip Gladstone, David J Boulos, Mark I Chagnon, Nicolas Shouldice, Elizabeth Atzema, Clare Slaoui, Tarik Teitlebaum, Jeanne Abdulaziz, Kasim E Nemnom, Marie-Joe Wells, George A Sharma, Mukul BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To validate the previously derived Canadian TIA Score to stratify subsequent stroke risk in a new cohort of emergency department patients with transient ischaemic attack. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 13 Canadian emergency departments over five years. PARTICIPANTS: 7607 consecutively enrolled adult patients attending the emergency department with transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was subsequent stroke or carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days. The secondary outcome was subsequent stroke within seven days (with or without carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting). Telephone follow-up used the validated Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke Free Status at seven and 90 days. All outcomes were adjudicated by panels of three stroke experts, blinded to the index emergency department visit. RESULTS: Of the 7607 patients, 108 (1.4%) had a subsequent stroke within seven days, 83 (1.1%) had carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days, and nine had both. The Canadian TIA Score stratified the risk of stroke, carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting, or both within seven days as low (risk ≤0.5%; interval likelihood ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.44), medium (risk 2.3%; interval likelihood ratio 0.94, 0.85 to 1.04), and high (risk 5.9% interval likelihood ratio 2.56, 2.02 to 3.25) more accurately (area under the curve 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.73) than did the ABCD2 (0.60, 0.55 to 0.64) or ABCD2i (0.64, 0.59 to 0.68). Results were similar for subsequent stroke regardless of carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days. CONCLUSION: The Canadian TIA Score stratifies patients’ seven day risk for stroke, with or without carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting, and is now ready for clinical use. Incorporating this validated risk estimate into management plans should improve early decision making at the index emergency visit regarding benefits of hospital admission, timing of investigations, and prioritisation of specialist referral. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7859838/ /pubmed/33541890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n49 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Perry, Jeffrey J
Sivilotti, Marco L A
Émond, Marcel
Stiell, Ian G
Stotts, Grant
Lee, Jacques
Worster, Andrew
Morris, Judy
Cheung, Ka Wai
Jin, Albert Y
Oczkowski, Wieslaw J
Sahlas, Demetrios J
Murray, Heather E
Mackey, Ariane
Verreault, Steve
Camden, Marie-Christine
Yip, Samuel
Teal, Philip
Gladstone, David J
Boulos, Mark I
Chagnon, Nicolas
Shouldice, Elizabeth
Atzema, Clare
Slaoui, Tarik
Teitlebaum, Jeanne
Abdulaziz, Kasim E
Nemnom, Marie-Joe
Wells, George A
Sharma, Mukul
Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study
title Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study
title_full Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study
title_short Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study
title_sort prospective validation of canadian tia score and comparison with abcd2 and abcd2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33541890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n49
work_keys_str_mv AT perryjeffreyj prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT sivilottimarcola prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT emondmarcel prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT stielliang prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT stottsgrant prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT leejacques prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT worsterandrew prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT morrisjudy prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT cheungkawai prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT jinalberty prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT oczkowskiwieslawj prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT sahlasdemetriosj prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT murrayheathere prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT mackeyariane prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT verreaultsteve prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT camdenmariechristine prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT yipsamuel prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT tealphilip prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT gladstonedavidj prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT boulosmarki prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT chagnonnicolas prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT shouldiceelizabeth prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT atzemaclare prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT slaouitarik prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT teitlebaumjeanne prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT abdulazizkasime prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT nemnommariejoe prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT wellsgeorgea prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy
AT sharmamukul prospectivevalidationofcanadiantiascoreandcomparisonwithabcd2andabcd2iforsubsequentstrokeriskaftertransientischaemicattackmulticentreprospectivecohortstudy