Cargando…
CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor
BACKGROUND: Gastric ectopic pancreas (GEPs) is a rare developmental anomaly which is difficult to differentiate it from submucosal tumor such as gastric stromal tumor (GST) by imaging methods. Since the treatments of the GEPs and GST are totally different, a correct diagnosis is essential. Therefore...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7860050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33541287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01617-8 |
_version_ | 1783646862353367040 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Chang Yang, Fang Zhang, Wenming Ao, Weiqun An, Yongyu Zhang, Cui Dai, Bailing Pu, Cailing Wang, Jian |
author_facet | Liu, Chang Yang, Fang Zhang, Wenming Ao, Weiqun An, Yongyu Zhang, Cui Dai, Bailing Pu, Cailing Wang, Jian |
author_sort | Liu, Chang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastric ectopic pancreas (GEPs) is a rare developmental anomaly which is difficult to differentiate it from submucosal tumor such as gastric stromal tumor (GST) by imaging methods. Since the treatments of the GEPs and GST are totally different, a correct diagnosis is essential. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the CT features of them to help us deepen the understanding of GEPs and GST. METHODS: This study enrolled 17 GEPs and 119 GST, which were proven pathologically. We assessed clinical and CT features to identify significant differential features of GEPs from GST using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, among all clinicoradiologic features, features of age, symptom, tumor marker, location, contour, peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis, calcification, CT attenuation value of unenhancement phase/arterial phase/portal venous phase (CTu/CTa/CTp), the CT attenuation value of arterial phase/portal venous phase minus that of unenhanced phase (DEAP/DEPP), long diameter (LD), short diameter (SD) were considered statistically significant for the differentiation of them. And the multivariate analysis revealed that location, peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis and DEPP were independent factors affecting the identification of them. In addition, ROC analysis showed that the test efficiency of CTp was perfect (AUC = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Location, the presence of peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis and DEPP are useful CT differentiators of GEPs from GST. In addition, the test efficiency of CTp in differentiating them was perfect (AUC = 0.900). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7860050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78600502021-02-05 CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor Liu, Chang Yang, Fang Zhang, Wenming Ao, Weiqun An, Yongyu Zhang, Cui Dai, Bailing Pu, Cailing Wang, Jian BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gastric ectopic pancreas (GEPs) is a rare developmental anomaly which is difficult to differentiate it from submucosal tumor such as gastric stromal tumor (GST) by imaging methods. Since the treatments of the GEPs and GST are totally different, a correct diagnosis is essential. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the CT features of them to help us deepen the understanding of GEPs and GST. METHODS: This study enrolled 17 GEPs and 119 GST, which were proven pathologically. We assessed clinical and CT features to identify significant differential features of GEPs from GST using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, among all clinicoradiologic features, features of age, symptom, tumor marker, location, contour, peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis, calcification, CT attenuation value of unenhancement phase/arterial phase/portal venous phase (CTu/CTa/CTp), the CT attenuation value of arterial phase/portal venous phase minus that of unenhanced phase (DEAP/DEPP), long diameter (LD), short diameter (SD) were considered statistically significant for the differentiation of them. And the multivariate analysis revealed that location, peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis and DEPP were independent factors affecting the identification of them. In addition, ROC analysis showed that the test efficiency of CTp was perfect (AUC = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Location, the presence of peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis and DEPP are useful CT differentiators of GEPs from GST. In addition, the test efficiency of CTp in differentiating them was perfect (AUC = 0.900). BioMed Central 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7860050/ /pubmed/33541287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01617-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Chang Yang, Fang Zhang, Wenming Ao, Weiqun An, Yongyu Zhang, Cui Dai, Bailing Pu, Cailing Wang, Jian CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor |
title | CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor |
title_full | CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor |
title_fullStr | CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor |
title_full_unstemmed | CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor |
title_short | CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor |
title_sort | ct differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7860050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33541287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01617-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuchang ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor AT yangfang ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor AT zhangwenming ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor AT aoweiqun ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor AT anyongyu ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor AT zhangcui ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor AT daibailing ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor AT pucailing ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor AT wangjian ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor |