Cargando…

CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor

BACKGROUND: Gastric ectopic pancreas (GEPs) is a rare developmental anomaly which is difficult to differentiate it from submucosal tumor such as gastric stromal tumor (GST) by imaging methods. Since the treatments of the GEPs and GST are totally different, a correct diagnosis is essential. Therefore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chang, Yang, Fang, Zhang, Wenming, Ao, Weiqun, An, Yongyu, Zhang, Cui, Dai, Bailing, Pu, Cailing, Wang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7860050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33541287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01617-8
_version_ 1783646862353367040
author Liu, Chang
Yang, Fang
Zhang, Wenming
Ao, Weiqun
An, Yongyu
Zhang, Cui
Dai, Bailing
Pu, Cailing
Wang, Jian
author_facet Liu, Chang
Yang, Fang
Zhang, Wenming
Ao, Weiqun
An, Yongyu
Zhang, Cui
Dai, Bailing
Pu, Cailing
Wang, Jian
author_sort Liu, Chang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastric ectopic pancreas (GEPs) is a rare developmental anomaly which is difficult to differentiate it from submucosal tumor such as gastric stromal tumor (GST) by imaging methods. Since the treatments of the GEPs and GST are totally different, a correct diagnosis is essential. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the CT features of them to help us deepen the understanding of GEPs and GST. METHODS: This study enrolled 17 GEPs and 119 GST, which were proven pathologically. We assessed clinical and CT features to identify significant differential features of GEPs from GST using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, among all clinicoradiologic features, features of age, symptom, tumor marker, location, contour, peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis, calcification, CT attenuation value of unenhancement phase/arterial phase/portal venous phase (CTu/CTa/CTp), the CT attenuation value of arterial phase/portal venous phase minus that of unenhanced phase (DEAP/DEPP), long diameter (LD), short diameter (SD) were considered statistically significant for the differentiation of them. And the multivariate analysis revealed that location, peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis and DEPP were independent factors affecting the identification of them. In addition, ROC analysis showed that the test efficiency of CTp was perfect (AUC = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Location, the presence of peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis and DEPP are useful CT differentiators of GEPs from GST. In addition, the test efficiency of CTp in differentiating them was perfect (AUC = 0.900).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7860050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78600502021-02-05 CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor Liu, Chang Yang, Fang Zhang, Wenming Ao, Weiqun An, Yongyu Zhang, Cui Dai, Bailing Pu, Cailing Wang, Jian BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gastric ectopic pancreas (GEPs) is a rare developmental anomaly which is difficult to differentiate it from submucosal tumor such as gastric stromal tumor (GST) by imaging methods. Since the treatments of the GEPs and GST are totally different, a correct diagnosis is essential. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the CT features of them to help us deepen the understanding of GEPs and GST. METHODS: This study enrolled 17 GEPs and 119 GST, which were proven pathologically. We assessed clinical and CT features to identify significant differential features of GEPs from GST using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, among all clinicoradiologic features, features of age, symptom, tumor marker, location, contour, peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis, calcification, CT attenuation value of unenhancement phase/arterial phase/portal venous phase (CTu/CTa/CTp), the CT attenuation value of arterial phase/portal venous phase minus that of unenhanced phase (DEAP/DEPP), long diameter (LD), short diameter (SD) were considered statistically significant for the differentiation of them. And the multivariate analysis revealed that location, peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis and DEPP were independent factors affecting the identification of them. In addition, ROC analysis showed that the test efficiency of CTp was perfect (AUC = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Location, the presence of peritumoral infiltration or fat-line of peritumor, necrosis and DEPP are useful CT differentiators of GEPs from GST. In addition, the test efficiency of CTp in differentiating them was perfect (AUC = 0.900). BioMed Central 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7860050/ /pubmed/33541287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01617-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Chang
Yang, Fang
Zhang, Wenming
Ao, Weiqun
An, Yongyu
Zhang, Cui
Dai, Bailing
Pu, Cailing
Wang, Jian
CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor
title CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor
title_full CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor
title_fullStr CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor
title_full_unstemmed CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor
title_short CT differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor
title_sort ct differentiation of gastric ectopic pancreas from gastric stromal tumor
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7860050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33541287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01617-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchang ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor
AT yangfang ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor
AT zhangwenming ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor
AT aoweiqun ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor
AT anyongyu ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor
AT zhangcui ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor
AT daibailing ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor
AT pucailing ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor
AT wangjian ctdifferentiationofgastricectopicpancreasfromgastricstromaltumor