Cargando…

Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and pulmonary function tests. METHODS: After conducting an exhaustive literature search, we performed a meta-analysis. We employed the inverse variance method with a random-effects model to calculate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Díez-Manglano, Jesús, Asìn Samper, Uxua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00371-2020
_version_ 1783647001935609856
author Díez-Manglano, Jesús
Asìn Samper, Uxua
author_facet Díez-Manglano, Jesús
Asìn Samper, Uxua
author_sort Díez-Manglano, Jesús
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and pulmonary function tests. METHODS: After conducting an exhaustive literature search, we performed a meta-analysis. We employed the inverse variance method with a random-effects model to calculate the effect estimate as the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We calculated the heterogeneity with the I(2) statistic and performed a meta-regression analysis by sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and geographical region. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis according to the studies’ publication date, size of the T2D group and the study quality, excluding the study with the greatest weight in the effect. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 66 studies (one longitudinal, two case–control and 63 cross-sectional), with 11 134 patients with T2D and 48 377 control participants. The pooled MD (95% CI) for the predicted percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of FVC, peak expiratory flow, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide were −7.15 (95% CI −8.27, −6.03; p<0.001), −9.21 (95% CI −11.15, −7.26; p<0.001), −9.89 (95% CI −14.42, −5.36; p<0.001), −9.79 (95% CI −13.42, −6.15; p<0.001) and −7.13 (95% CI −10.62, −3.64; p<0.001), respectively. There was no difference in the ratio of FEV(1)/FVC (95% CI −0.27; −1.63, 1.08; p=0.69). In all cases, there was considerable heterogeneity. The meta-regression analysis showed that between studies heterogeneity was not explained by patient sex, BMI, smoking or geographical region. The findings were consistent in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: T2D is associated with impaired pulmonary function, independently of sex, smoking, BMI and geographical region. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate outcomes for patients with T2D and impaired pulmonary function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7861023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78610232021-02-09 Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis Díez-Manglano, Jesús Asìn Samper, Uxua ERJ Open Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and pulmonary function tests. METHODS: After conducting an exhaustive literature search, we performed a meta-analysis. We employed the inverse variance method with a random-effects model to calculate the effect estimate as the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We calculated the heterogeneity with the I(2) statistic and performed a meta-regression analysis by sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and geographical region. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis according to the studies’ publication date, size of the T2D group and the study quality, excluding the study with the greatest weight in the effect. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 66 studies (one longitudinal, two case–control and 63 cross-sectional), with 11 134 patients with T2D and 48 377 control participants. The pooled MD (95% CI) for the predicted percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of FVC, peak expiratory flow, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide were −7.15 (95% CI −8.27, −6.03; p<0.001), −9.21 (95% CI −11.15, −7.26; p<0.001), −9.89 (95% CI −14.42, −5.36; p<0.001), −9.79 (95% CI −13.42, −6.15; p<0.001) and −7.13 (95% CI −10.62, −3.64; p<0.001), respectively. There was no difference in the ratio of FEV(1)/FVC (95% CI −0.27; −1.63, 1.08; p=0.69). In all cases, there was considerable heterogeneity. The meta-regression analysis showed that between studies heterogeneity was not explained by patient sex, BMI, smoking or geographical region. The findings were consistent in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: T2D is associated with impaired pulmonary function, independently of sex, smoking, BMI and geographical region. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate outcomes for patients with T2D and impaired pulmonary function. European Respiratory Society 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7861023/ /pubmed/33569495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00371-2020 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Díez-Manglano, Jesús
Asìn Samper, Uxua
Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
title Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
title_full Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
title_short Pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
title_sort pulmonary function tests in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33569495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00371-2020
work_keys_str_mv AT diezmanglanojesus pulmonaryfunctiontestsintype2diabetesametaanalysis
AT asinsamperuxua pulmonaryfunctiontestsintype2diabetesametaanalysis