Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using ProTaper Next, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary systems: An in vitro study

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of intracanal bacteria extruded apically after instrumentation with three different nickel–titanium rotary instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: Forty freshly extracted mandibular premolars were selected, access cavities were prepared, and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Polineni, Swapnika, Damaraju, Bhargavi, Bolla, Nagesh, Sunil, Ch, Krishna, N. Vamsee, Sreeha, K.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551607 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_283_19

Ejemplares similares

Comparison of the fracture resistance of the teeth prepared with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Gold rotary files
por: Salem Milani, Amin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effects of Reciproc, Mtwo and ProTaper Instruments on Formation of Root Fracture
por: Jalali, Sahar, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparative Analysis of Apical Root Crack Propagation after Root Canal Preparation at Different Instrumentation Lengths Using ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Gold Rotary Files: An In vitro Study
por: Nishad, Sonalkumari Vakilram, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The effects of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Gold nickel-titanium instruments
por: Özyürek, Taha, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
por: UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Torsional resistance of three ProTaper rotary systems
por: Alqedairi, Abdullah, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
por: Yılmaz Çırakoglu, Neslihan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems
por: DUQUE, Jussaro Alves, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Analysis of Surface Characteristics of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next Instruments by Scanning Electron Microscopy
por: Bennett, Jeffery, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Mechanical Properties of ProTaper Gold, EdgeTaper Platinum, Flex Gold and Pro-T Rotary Systems
por: Alcalde, Murilo Priori, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems
por: Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Microscopic Assessment of Dentinal Defects Induced by ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and Hyflex Electric Discharge Machining Rotary File Systems – An in vitro Study
por: Devi, Takhellambam Premlata, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
por: Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals
por: Wu, Hui, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparative study of ProTaper gold, reciproc, and ProTaper universal for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals
por: Arslan, Hakan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Root canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals
por: Park, Hyun-Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Failure of ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments used by undergraduate students
por: García-Font, Marc, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study
por: Garlapati, Roopadevi, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems
por: Ozsu, Damla, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Efficacy of ProTaper and Mtwo Retreatment Files in Removal of Gutta-percha and GuttaFlow from Root Canals
por: Khedmat, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The failures of root canal preparation with hand ProTaper
por: Bătăiosu, Marilena, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Comparison of cleaning efficiency and deformation characteristics of Twisted File and ProTaper rotary instruments
por: Li, Hang, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Investigation on the Clinical Lifetime of ProTaper Rotary File System
por: Penta, Virgil, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Stereomicroscopic evaluation of dentinal defects induced by new rotary system: “ProTaper NEXT”
por: Shori, Deepa Deepak, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris with V-Taper, ProTaper Next, and the Self-adjusting File systems
por: Vyavahare, Nishant K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Dentinal Cracks at Different Instrumentation Lengths by Using Different Rotary Files (ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM): An Ex Vivo Study
por: Ashraf, Fauzia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

EVALUATION OF APICAL DEVIATION IN ROOT CANALS INSTRUMENTED WITH K3 AND ProTaper SYSTEMS
por: dos Santos, Mariana Diniz Bisi, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Cyclic Fatigue Comparison of TruNatomy, Twisted File, and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems
por: Riyahi, Abdullah Mahmoud, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Apical Extrusion of Debris during Root Canal Preparation with ProTaper Next, WaveOne Gold and Twisted Files
por: Eliasz, Wojciech, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of Root Dentinal Damage Associated with ProTaper Gold, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Next during Cleaning and Shaping Procedures: An In vitro Analysis
por: Koroth, Sarin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of the incidence of microcracks caused by Mtwo and ProTaper Next rotary file systems versus the self-adjusting file: A scanning electron microscopic study
por: Saha, Suparna Ganguly, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper™, Hyflex™ and Waveone™ rotary systems
por: Surakanti, Jayaprada Reddy, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Apical extrusion of intracanal biofilm using ProTaper Gold, WaveOne Gold,Twisted File Adaptive, OneShape New Generation and K3XF
por: Zan, Recai, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Wizard CD Plus and ProTaper Universal: analysis of apical transportation using new software
por: GIANNASTASIO, Daiana, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study
por: Singh, Abhishek, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Impact of Three Different Canal Lubricants on Fracture, Deformity and Metal Slivering of ProTaper Rotary Instruments
por: Shantiaee, Yazdan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Canal Preparation Pattern of K3 and ProTaper Rotary Files in Curved Resin Blocks
por: Mohammadzade Akhlaghi, Nahid, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The self-adjusting file instrumentation results in less debris extrusion apically when compared to WaveOne and ProTaper NEXT
por: Pawar, Ajinkya M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Effect of RaCe, ProTaper, and V-Taper rotary systems on dentinal crack formation during endodontic treatment: An in vitro study
por: Shahi, Shahriar, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use
por: Fernández-Pazos, Gema, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_m6u2ot5dkuve78d9an1vvvqcn8