Cargando…

To evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: In vitro study

AIM: This study was aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Experimental in vitro study. METHODOLOGY: Eighty extracted maxillary central incisors were selected and decoronated keeping 2 mm of crown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dutta, Aparajita, Nadig, Roopa R., Gowda, Yashwanth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551591
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_366_20
_version_ 1783647012103651328
author Dutta, Aparajita
Nadig, Roopa R.
Gowda, Yashwanth
author_facet Dutta, Aparajita
Nadig, Roopa R.
Gowda, Yashwanth
author_sort Dutta, Aparajita
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study was aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Experimental in vitro study. METHODOLOGY: Eighty extracted maxillary central incisors were selected and decoronated keeping 2 mm of crown ferrule and were endodontically treated. Postspace was prepared retaining 5 mm apical gp using peeso 3. Samples were divided into two groups. In Group 1, Wax pattern fabricated to accommodate different core angulations to be casted with Ni-Cr alloy. In Group 2, ever stick posts were angulated and cemented followed by porcelain fused to metal crown cementation for both the groups. Samples were thermocycled and subjected to the universal testing machine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test were used to compare the mean fracture resistance between different angulations in cast post and ever stick posts. Student’s paired t-test was used to compare the mean fracture resistance between cast post and everstick posts for each angulations. P value was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The fracture resistance was the highest at 20° and lowest at 30° core angulations in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Changing core angulation up to 20° can be carried out safely using any of the post systems tested in the study. Core angulations >20°, should be used with caution, especially in patients with abnormal parafunctional habits and occlusal trauma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7861075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78610752021-02-05 To evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: In vitro study Dutta, Aparajita Nadig, Roopa R. Gowda, Yashwanth J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: This study was aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Experimental in vitro study. METHODOLOGY: Eighty extracted maxillary central incisors were selected and decoronated keeping 2 mm of crown ferrule and were endodontically treated. Postspace was prepared retaining 5 mm apical gp using peeso 3. Samples were divided into two groups. In Group 1, Wax pattern fabricated to accommodate different core angulations to be casted with Ni-Cr alloy. In Group 2, ever stick posts were angulated and cemented followed by porcelain fused to metal crown cementation for both the groups. Samples were thermocycled and subjected to the universal testing machine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test were used to compare the mean fracture resistance between different angulations in cast post and ever stick posts. Student’s paired t-test was used to compare the mean fracture resistance between cast post and everstick posts for each angulations. P value was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The fracture resistance was the highest at 20° and lowest at 30° core angulations in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Changing core angulation up to 20° can be carried out safely using any of the post systems tested in the study. Core angulations >20°, should be used with caution, especially in patients with abnormal parafunctional habits and occlusal trauma. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7861075/ /pubmed/33551591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_366_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dutta, Aparajita
Nadig, Roopa R.
Gowda, Yashwanth
To evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: In vitro study
title To evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: In vitro study
title_full To evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: In vitro study
title_fullStr To evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: In vitro study
title_full_unstemmed To evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: In vitro study
title_short To evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: In vitro study
title_sort to evaluate the fracture resistance of proclined endodontically treated teeth with different post and core systems: in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551591
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_366_20
work_keys_str_mv AT duttaaparajita toevaluatethefractureresistanceofproclinedendodonticallytreatedteethwithdifferentpostandcoresystemsinvitrostudy
AT nadigroopar toevaluatethefractureresistanceofproclinedendodonticallytreatedteethwithdifferentpostandcoresystemsinvitrostudy
AT gowdayashwanth toevaluatethefractureresistanceofproclinedendodonticallytreatedteethwithdifferentpostandcoresystemsinvitrostudy