Cargando…

Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal

BACKGROUND: The isthmus and irregularities present in the root canal system are potential areas for debris accumulation areas and therefore the seach for devices and solutions to improve cleaning of these areas is of utmust importance. This study evaluated, by micro–computed tomography, the efficien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortigara, Giovani Antonio, Prado, Maíra, Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu, dos Santos, Bernardo Camargo, Gusman, Heloisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551594
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_293_20
_version_ 1783647012337483776
author Ortigara, Giovani Antonio
Prado, Maíra
Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu
dos Santos, Bernardo Camargo
Gusman, Heloisa
author_facet Ortigara, Giovani Antonio
Prado, Maíra
Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu
dos Santos, Bernardo Camargo
Gusman, Heloisa
author_sort Ortigara, Giovani Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The isthmus and irregularities present in the root canal system are potential areas for debris accumulation areas and therefore the seach for devices and solutions to improve cleaning of these areas is of utmust importance. This study evaluated, by micro–computed tomography, the efficiency of 37% phosphoric acid solution with that of 17% EDTA in the removal of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD) after canal preparation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-six mesial roots of mandibular molars were subjected to microtomographic scanning using the SkyScan 1173 X-ray microtomograph at a resolution of 14,97 µm. The canals were prepared using Reciproc R40 instruments, 6% NaOCl and EndoVac System® to irrigation/aspiration. After instrumentation, the specimens were divided into two groups: 37% phosphoric acid solution or 17% EDTA. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that 37% phosphoric acid was significantly more effective in removing smear layer and AHTD than 17% EDTA (Mann-Whitney, P <0.05). It was shown that both 37% phosphoric acid and 17% EDTA are effective agents in the removal of smear layer and debris, but better results were obtained with the use of 37% phosphoric acid. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that this solution can be a potential alternative to remove smear layer after root canal preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7861076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78610762021-02-05 Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal Ortigara, Giovani Antonio Prado, Maíra Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu dos Santos, Bernardo Camargo Gusman, Heloisa J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The isthmus and irregularities present in the root canal system are potential areas for debris accumulation areas and therefore the seach for devices and solutions to improve cleaning of these areas is of utmust importance. This study evaluated, by micro–computed tomography, the efficiency of 37% phosphoric acid solution with that of 17% EDTA in the removal of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD) after canal preparation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-six mesial roots of mandibular molars were subjected to microtomographic scanning using the SkyScan 1173 X-ray microtomograph at a resolution of 14,97 µm. The canals were prepared using Reciproc R40 instruments, 6% NaOCl and EndoVac System® to irrigation/aspiration. After instrumentation, the specimens were divided into two groups: 37% phosphoric acid solution or 17% EDTA. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that 37% phosphoric acid was significantly more effective in removing smear layer and AHTD than 17% EDTA (Mann-Whitney, P <0.05). It was shown that both 37% phosphoric acid and 17% EDTA are effective agents in the removal of smear layer and debris, but better results were obtained with the use of 37% phosphoric acid. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that this solution can be a potential alternative to remove smear layer after root canal preparation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7861076/ /pubmed/33551594 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_293_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ortigara, Giovani Antonio
Prado, Maíra
Lopes, Ricardo Tadeu
dos Santos, Bernardo Camargo
Gusman, Heloisa
Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal
title Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal
title_full Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal
title_fullStr Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal
title_full_unstemmed Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal
title_short Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal
title_sort micro-computed tomographic evaluation of smear layer and accumulated hard tissue debris removal
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551594
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_293_20
work_keys_str_mv AT ortigaragiovaniantonio microcomputedtomographicevaluationofsmearlayerandaccumulatedhardtissuedebrisremoval
AT pradomaira microcomputedtomographicevaluationofsmearlayerandaccumulatedhardtissuedebrisremoval
AT lopesricardotadeu microcomputedtomographicevaluationofsmearlayerandaccumulatedhardtissuedebrisremoval
AT dossantosbernardocamargo microcomputedtomographicevaluationofsmearlayerandaccumulatedhardtissuedebrisremoval
AT gusmanheloisa microcomputedtomographicevaluationofsmearlayerandaccumulatedhardtissuedebrisremoval