Cargando…
Population-Based Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Human vs. Machine Intelligence
Incidence and mortality rates of endometrial cancer are increasing, leading to increased interest in endometrial cancer risk prediction and stratification to help in screening and prevention. Previous risk models have had moderate success with the area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.68 to 0.77...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.539879 |
_version_ | 1783647062770843648 |
---|---|
author | Hart, Gregory R. Yan, Vanessa Huang, Gloria S. Liang, Ying Nartowt, Bradley J. Muhammad, Wazir Deng, Jun |
author_facet | Hart, Gregory R. Yan, Vanessa Huang, Gloria S. Liang, Ying Nartowt, Bradley J. Muhammad, Wazir Deng, Jun |
author_sort | Hart, Gregory R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Incidence and mortality rates of endometrial cancer are increasing, leading to increased interest in endometrial cancer risk prediction and stratification to help in screening and prevention. Previous risk models have had moderate success with the area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.68 to 0.77. Here we demonstrate a population-based machine learning model for endometrial cancer screening that achieves a testing AUC of 0.96. We train seven machine learning algorithms based solely on personal health data, without any genomic, imaging, biomarkers, or invasive procedures. The data come from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). We further compare our machine learning model with 15 gynecologic oncologists and primary care physicians in the stratification of endometrial cancer risk for 100 women. We find a random forest model that achieves a testing AUC of 0.96 and a neural network model that achieves a testing AUC of 0.91. We test both models in risk stratification against 15 practicing physicians. Our random forest model is 2.5 times better at identifying above-average risk women with a 2-fold reduction in the false positive rate. Our neural network model is 2 times better at identifying above-average risk women with a 3-fold reduction in the false positive rate. Our machine learning models provide a non-invasive and cost-effective way to identify high-risk sub-populations who may benefit from early screening of endometrial cancer, prior to disease onset. Through statistical biopsy of personal health data, we have identified a new and effective approach for early cancer detection and prevention for individual patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7861326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78613262021-03-16 Population-Based Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Human vs. Machine Intelligence Hart, Gregory R. Yan, Vanessa Huang, Gloria S. Liang, Ying Nartowt, Bradley J. Muhammad, Wazir Deng, Jun Front Artif Intell Original Research Incidence and mortality rates of endometrial cancer are increasing, leading to increased interest in endometrial cancer risk prediction and stratification to help in screening and prevention. Previous risk models have had moderate success with the area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.68 to 0.77. Here we demonstrate a population-based machine learning model for endometrial cancer screening that achieves a testing AUC of 0.96. We train seven machine learning algorithms based solely on personal health data, without any genomic, imaging, biomarkers, or invasive procedures. The data come from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). We further compare our machine learning model with 15 gynecologic oncologists and primary care physicians in the stratification of endometrial cancer risk for 100 women. We find a random forest model that achieves a testing AUC of 0.96 and a neural network model that achieves a testing AUC of 0.91. We test both models in risk stratification against 15 practicing physicians. Our random forest model is 2.5 times better at identifying above-average risk women with a 2-fold reduction in the false positive rate. Our neural network model is 2 times better at identifying above-average risk women with a 3-fold reduction in the false positive rate. Our machine learning models provide a non-invasive and cost-effective way to identify high-risk sub-populations who may benefit from early screening of endometrial cancer, prior to disease onset. Through statistical biopsy of personal health data, we have identified a new and effective approach for early cancer detection and prevention for individual patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7861326/ /pubmed/33733200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.539879 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hart, Yan, Huang, Liang, Nartowt, Muhammad and Deng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hart, Gregory R. Yan, Vanessa Huang, Gloria S. Liang, Ying Nartowt, Bradley J. Muhammad, Wazir Deng, Jun Population-Based Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Human vs. Machine Intelligence |
title | Population-Based Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Human vs. Machine Intelligence |
title_full | Population-Based Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Human vs. Machine Intelligence |
title_fullStr | Population-Based Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Human vs. Machine Intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | Population-Based Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Human vs. Machine Intelligence |
title_short | Population-Based Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Human vs. Machine Intelligence |
title_sort | population-based screening for endometrial cancer: human vs. machine intelligence |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.539879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartgregoryr populationbasedscreeningforendometrialcancerhumanvsmachineintelligence AT yanvanessa populationbasedscreeningforendometrialcancerhumanvsmachineintelligence AT huangglorias populationbasedscreeningforendometrialcancerhumanvsmachineintelligence AT liangying populationbasedscreeningforendometrialcancerhumanvsmachineintelligence AT nartowtbradleyj populationbasedscreeningforendometrialcancerhumanvsmachineintelligence AT muhammadwazir populationbasedscreeningforendometrialcancerhumanvsmachineintelligence AT dengjun populationbasedscreeningforendometrialcancerhumanvsmachineintelligence |