Cargando…

Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies

Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanyi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Silva, Brian M., Higdon, David M., Brunton, Steven L., Kutz, J. Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733144
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00025
_version_ 1783647067042742272
author de Silva, Brian M.
Higdon, David M.
Brunton, Steven L.
Kutz, J. Nathan
author_facet de Silva, Brian M.
Higdon, David M.
Brunton, Steven L.
Kutz, J. Nathan
author_sort de Silva, Brian M.
collection PubMed
description Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanying discrepancy model to account for the inevitable mismatch between theory and measurements. By revisiting the classic problem of modeling falling objects of different size and mass, we highlight a number of nuanced issues that must be addressed by modern data-driven methods for automated physics discovery. Specifically, we show that measurement noise and complex secondary physical mechanisms, like unsteady fluid drag forces, can obscure the underlying law of gravitation, leading to an erroneous model. We use the sparse identification of non-linear dynamics (SINDy) method to identify governing equations for real-world measurement data and simulated trajectories. Incorporating into SINDy the assumption that each falling object is governed by a similar physical law is shown to improve the robustness of the learned models, but discrepancies between the predictions and observations persist due to subtleties in drag dynamics. This work highlights the fact that the naive application of ML/AI will generally be insufficient to infer universal physical laws without further modification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7861345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78613452021-03-16 Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies de Silva, Brian M. Higdon, David M. Brunton, Steven L. Kutz, J. Nathan Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanying discrepancy model to account for the inevitable mismatch between theory and measurements. By revisiting the classic problem of modeling falling objects of different size and mass, we highlight a number of nuanced issues that must be addressed by modern data-driven methods for automated physics discovery. Specifically, we show that measurement noise and complex secondary physical mechanisms, like unsteady fluid drag forces, can obscure the underlying law of gravitation, leading to an erroneous model. We use the sparse identification of non-linear dynamics (SINDy) method to identify governing equations for real-world measurement data and simulated trajectories. Incorporating into SINDy the assumption that each falling object is governed by a similar physical law is shown to improve the robustness of the learned models, but discrepancies between the predictions and observations persist due to subtleties in drag dynamics. This work highlights the fact that the naive application of ML/AI will generally be insufficient to infer universal physical laws without further modification. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7861345/ /pubmed/33733144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00025 Text en Copyright © 2020 de Silva, Higdon, Brunton and Kutz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
de Silva, Brian M.
Higdon, David M.
Brunton, Steven L.
Kutz, J. Nathan
Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_full Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_fullStr Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_full_unstemmed Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_short Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_sort discovery of physics from data: universal laws and discrepancies
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733144
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00025
work_keys_str_mv AT desilvabrianm discoveryofphysicsfromdatauniversallawsanddiscrepancies
AT higdondavidm discoveryofphysicsfromdatauniversallawsanddiscrepancies
AT bruntonstevenl discoveryofphysicsfromdatauniversallawsanddiscrepancies
AT kutzjnathan discoveryofphysicsfromdatauniversallawsanddiscrepancies