Cargando…
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for a one-piece implant (group G1), a nar...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800 |
_version_ | 1783647077988827136 |
---|---|
author | Barbosa, Fabricia Teixeira Zanatta, Luiz Carlos Silveira de Souza Rendohl, Edélcio Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre |
author_facet | Barbosa, Fabricia Teixeira Zanatta, Luiz Carlos Silveira de Souza Rendohl, Edélcio Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre |
author_sort | Barbosa, Fabricia Teixeira |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for a one-piece implant (group G1), a narrow diameter of 3.0 mm for a one-piece implant (group G2) and a narrow diameter of 3.5 mm for a two-piece implant with a Morse taper connection (group G3). A three-dimensional model was designed with cortical and cancellous bone, a crown and an implant/abutment set of each group. Axial and angled (30°) loads of 150 N was applied. The equivalent von Mises stress was used for the implants and peri-implant bone plus the Mohr-Coulomb analysis to confirm the data of the peri-implant bone. RESULTS: In the axial load, the maximum stress value of the cortical bone for the group G1 was 22.35% higher than that the group G2 and 321.23% than the group G3. Whereas in angled load, the groups G1 and G2 showing a similar value (# 3.5%) and a highest difference for the group G3 (391.8%). In the implant structure, the group G1 showed a value of 2188MPa, 93.6% higher than the limit. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that the extra-narrow one-piece implant should be used with great caution, especially in areas of non-axial loads, whereas the one- and two-piece narrow-diameter implants show adequate behavior in both directions of the applied load. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7861395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78613952021-02-12 Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study Barbosa, Fabricia Teixeira Zanatta, Luiz Carlos Silveira de Souza Rendohl, Edélcio Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for a one-piece implant (group G1), a narrow diameter of 3.0 mm for a one-piece implant (group G2) and a narrow diameter of 3.5 mm for a two-piece implant with a Morse taper connection (group G3). A three-dimensional model was designed with cortical and cancellous bone, a crown and an implant/abutment set of each group. Axial and angled (30°) loads of 150 N was applied. The equivalent von Mises stress was used for the implants and peri-implant bone plus the Mohr-Coulomb analysis to confirm the data of the peri-implant bone. RESULTS: In the axial load, the maximum stress value of the cortical bone for the group G1 was 22.35% higher than that the group G2 and 321.23% than the group G3. Whereas in angled load, the groups G1 and G2 showing a similar value (# 3.5%) and a highest difference for the group G3 (391.8%). In the implant structure, the group G1 showed a value of 2188MPa, 93.6% higher than the limit. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that the extra-narrow one-piece implant should be used with great caution, especially in areas of non-axial loads, whereas the one- and two-piece narrow-diameter implants show adequate behavior in both directions of the applied load. Public Library of Science 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7861395/ /pubmed/33539392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800 Text en © 2021 Barbosa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Barbosa, Fabricia Teixeira Zanatta, Luiz Carlos Silveira de Souza Rendohl, Edélcio Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study |
title | Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study |
title_full | Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study |
title_short | Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study |
title_sort | comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: a finite element study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbosafabriciateixeira comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy AT zanattaluizcarlossilveira comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy AT desouzarendohledelcio comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy AT gehrkesergioalexandre comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy |