Cargando…

The Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Tool development, factor structure and validity

Currently health care pathways (the combination and order of services that a patient receives to manage their injury) following a mild traumatic brain injury vary considerably. Some clinicians lack confidence in injury recognition, management and knowing when to refer. A clinical expert group develo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theadom, Alice, Hardaker, Natalie, Bray, Charlotte, Siegert, Richard, Henshall, Kevin, Forch, Katherine, Fernando, Kris, King, Doug, Fulcher, Mark, Jewell, Sam, Shaikh, Nusratnaaz, Bastos Gottgtroy, Renata, Hume, Patria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246512
_version_ 1783647091279527936
author Theadom, Alice
Hardaker, Natalie
Bray, Charlotte
Siegert, Richard
Henshall, Kevin
Forch, Katherine
Fernando, Kris
King, Doug
Fulcher, Mark
Jewell, Sam
Shaikh, Nusratnaaz
Bastos Gottgtroy, Renata
Hume, Patria
author_facet Theadom, Alice
Hardaker, Natalie
Bray, Charlotte
Siegert, Richard
Henshall, Kevin
Forch, Katherine
Fernando, Kris
King, Doug
Fulcher, Mark
Jewell, Sam
Shaikh, Nusratnaaz
Bastos Gottgtroy, Renata
Hume, Patria
author_sort Theadom, Alice
collection PubMed
description Currently health care pathways (the combination and order of services that a patient receives to manage their injury) following a mild traumatic brain injury vary considerably. Some clinicians lack confidence in injury recognition, management and knowing when to refer. A clinical expert group developed the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) to provide guidance on health care pathways based on clinical indicators of poor recovery. The tool aims to facilitate access to specialist services (if required) to improve longer term prognosis. The tool was developed using a three-step process including: 1) domain mapping; 2) item development and 3) item testing and review. An online retrospective survey of 114 adults (>16 years) who had experienced a mild brain injury in the past 10 years was used to determine the initial psychometric properties of the 15-item symptom scale of the BIST. Participants were randomised to complete the BIST and one of two existing symptom scales; the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptom Questionnaire (RPQ) or the Sports Concussion Assessment Test (SCAT-5) symptom scale to determine concurrent validity. Participant responses to the BIST symptom scale items were used to determine scale reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. A principal components analysis explored the underlying factor structure. Spearman’s correlation coefficients determined concurrent validity with the RPQ and SCAT-5 symptom scales. The 15 items were found to require a reading age of 6–8 years old using readability statistics. High concurrent validity was shown against the RPQ (r = 0.91) and SCAT-5 (r = 0.90). The BIST total symptom scale (α = 0.94) and the three factors identified demonstrated excellent internal consistency: physical/emotional (α = 0.90), cognitive (α = 0.92) and vestibular-ocular (α = 0.80). This study provides evidence to support the utility, internal consistency, factor structure and concurrent validity of the BIST. Further research is warranted to determine the utility of the BIST scoring criteria and responsiveness to change in patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7861451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78614512021-02-12 The Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Tool development, factor structure and validity Theadom, Alice Hardaker, Natalie Bray, Charlotte Siegert, Richard Henshall, Kevin Forch, Katherine Fernando, Kris King, Doug Fulcher, Mark Jewell, Sam Shaikh, Nusratnaaz Bastos Gottgtroy, Renata Hume, Patria PLoS One Research Article Currently health care pathways (the combination and order of services that a patient receives to manage their injury) following a mild traumatic brain injury vary considerably. Some clinicians lack confidence in injury recognition, management and knowing when to refer. A clinical expert group developed the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) to provide guidance on health care pathways based on clinical indicators of poor recovery. The tool aims to facilitate access to specialist services (if required) to improve longer term prognosis. The tool was developed using a three-step process including: 1) domain mapping; 2) item development and 3) item testing and review. An online retrospective survey of 114 adults (>16 years) who had experienced a mild brain injury in the past 10 years was used to determine the initial psychometric properties of the 15-item symptom scale of the BIST. Participants were randomised to complete the BIST and one of two existing symptom scales; the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptom Questionnaire (RPQ) or the Sports Concussion Assessment Test (SCAT-5) symptom scale to determine concurrent validity. Participant responses to the BIST symptom scale items were used to determine scale reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. A principal components analysis explored the underlying factor structure. Spearman’s correlation coefficients determined concurrent validity with the RPQ and SCAT-5 symptom scales. The 15 items were found to require a reading age of 6–8 years old using readability statistics. High concurrent validity was shown against the RPQ (r = 0.91) and SCAT-5 (r = 0.90). The BIST total symptom scale (α = 0.94) and the three factors identified demonstrated excellent internal consistency: physical/emotional (α = 0.90), cognitive (α = 0.92) and vestibular-ocular (α = 0.80). This study provides evidence to support the utility, internal consistency, factor structure and concurrent validity of the BIST. Further research is warranted to determine the utility of the BIST scoring criteria and responsiveness to change in patients. Public Library of Science 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7861451/ /pubmed/33539482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246512 Text en © 2021 Theadom et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Theadom, Alice
Hardaker, Natalie
Bray, Charlotte
Siegert, Richard
Henshall, Kevin
Forch, Katherine
Fernando, Kris
King, Doug
Fulcher, Mark
Jewell, Sam
Shaikh, Nusratnaaz
Bastos Gottgtroy, Renata
Hume, Patria
The Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Tool development, factor structure and validity
title The Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Tool development, factor structure and validity
title_full The Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Tool development, factor structure and validity
title_fullStr The Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Tool development, factor structure and validity
title_full_unstemmed The Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Tool development, factor structure and validity
title_short The Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Tool development, factor structure and validity
title_sort brain injury screening tool (bist): tool development, factor structure and validity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246512
work_keys_str_mv AT theadomalice thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT hardakernatalie thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT braycharlotte thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT siegertrichard thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT henshallkevin thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT forchkatherine thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT fernandokris thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT kingdoug thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT fulchermark thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT jewellsam thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT shaikhnusratnaaz thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT bastosgottgtroyrenata thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT humepatria thebraininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT theadomalice braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT hardakernatalie braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT braycharlotte braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT siegertrichard braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT henshallkevin braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT forchkatherine braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT fernandokris braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT kingdoug braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT fulchermark braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT jewellsam braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT shaikhnusratnaaz braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT bastosgottgtroyrenata braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity
AT humepatria braininjuryscreeningtoolbisttooldevelopmentfactorstructureandvalidity