Cargando…
Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic
PURPOSE: Catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) were significantly curtailed during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to conserve healthcare resources and limit exposure. There is little data regarding peri-procedural outcomes of medical procedures during th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00952-w |
_version_ | 1783647093914599424 |
---|---|
author | Barbhaiya, Chirag R. Wadhwani, Lalit Manmadhan, Arun Selim, Ahmed Knotts, Robert J. Kushnir, Alexander Spinelli, Michael Jankelson, Lior Bernstein, Scott Park, David Holmes, Douglas Aizer, Anthony Chinitz, Larry A. |
author_facet | Barbhaiya, Chirag R. Wadhwani, Lalit Manmadhan, Arun Selim, Ahmed Knotts, Robert J. Kushnir, Alexander Spinelli, Michael Jankelson, Lior Bernstein, Scott Park, David Holmes, Douglas Aizer, Anthony Chinitz, Larry A. |
author_sort | Barbhaiya, Chirag R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) were significantly curtailed during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to conserve healthcare resources and limit exposure. There is little data regarding peri-procedural outcomes of medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. We enacted protocols to safely reboot AF ablation while limiting healthcare resource utilization. We aimed to evaluate acute and subacute outcomes of protocols instituted for reboot of AF ablation during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Perioperative healthcare utilization and acute procedural outcomes were analyzed for consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation under COVID-19 protocols (2020 cohort; n=111) and compared to those of patients who underwent AF ablation during the same time period in 2019 (2019 cohort; n=200). Newly implemented practices included preoperative COVID-19 testing, selective transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), utilization of venous closure, and same-day discharge when clinically appropriate. RESULTS: Pre-ablation COVID-19 testing was positive in 1 of 111 patients. There were 0 cases ablation-related COVID-19 transmission and 0 major complications in either cohort. Pre-procedure TEE was performed in significantly fewer 2020 cohort patients compared to the 2019 cohort patients (68.4% vs. 97.5%, p <0.001, respectively) despite greater prevalence of persistent arrhythmia in the 2020 cohort. Same-day discharge was achieved in 68% of patients in the 2020 cohort, compared to 0% of patients in the 2019 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of safe resumption of complex electrophysiology procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing healthcare utilization and maintaining quality of care. Protocols instituted may be generalizable to other types of procedures and settings. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7861463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78614632021-02-05 Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic Barbhaiya, Chirag R. Wadhwani, Lalit Manmadhan, Arun Selim, Ahmed Knotts, Robert J. Kushnir, Alexander Spinelli, Michael Jankelson, Lior Bernstein, Scott Park, David Holmes, Douglas Aizer, Anthony Chinitz, Larry A. J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article PURPOSE: Catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) were significantly curtailed during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to conserve healthcare resources and limit exposure. There is little data regarding peri-procedural outcomes of medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. We enacted protocols to safely reboot AF ablation while limiting healthcare resource utilization. We aimed to evaluate acute and subacute outcomes of protocols instituted for reboot of AF ablation during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Perioperative healthcare utilization and acute procedural outcomes were analyzed for consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation under COVID-19 protocols (2020 cohort; n=111) and compared to those of patients who underwent AF ablation during the same time period in 2019 (2019 cohort; n=200). Newly implemented practices included preoperative COVID-19 testing, selective transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), utilization of venous closure, and same-day discharge when clinically appropriate. RESULTS: Pre-ablation COVID-19 testing was positive in 1 of 111 patients. There were 0 cases ablation-related COVID-19 transmission and 0 major complications in either cohort. Pre-procedure TEE was performed in significantly fewer 2020 cohort patients compared to the 2019 cohort patients (68.4% vs. 97.5%, p <0.001, respectively) despite greater prevalence of persistent arrhythmia in the 2020 cohort. Same-day discharge was achieved in 68% of patients in the 2020 cohort, compared to 0% of patients in the 2019 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of safe resumption of complex electrophysiology procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing healthcare utilization and maintaining quality of care. Protocols instituted may be generalizable to other types of procedures and settings. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2021-02-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC7861463/ /pubmed/33543350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00952-w Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Barbhaiya, Chirag R. Wadhwani, Lalit Manmadhan, Arun Selim, Ahmed Knotts, Robert J. Kushnir, Alexander Spinelli, Michael Jankelson, Lior Bernstein, Scott Park, David Holmes, Douglas Aizer, Anthony Chinitz, Larry A. Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00952-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbhaiyachiragr rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT wadhwanilalit rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT manmadhanarun rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT selimahmed rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT knottsrobertj rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT kushniralexander rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT spinellimichael rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT jankelsonlior rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT bernsteinscott rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT parkdavid rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT holmesdouglas rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT aizeranthony rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic AT chinitzlarrya rebootingatrialfibrillationablationinthecovid19pandemic |