Cargando…
Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Prolotherapy, which stimulates the healing of loosened ligaments and tendons, is a cost-effective and safe treatment modality for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Its benefits may be affected by injection protocols, comparative regimens, and evaluation scales. The aim of this study was to d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348947 http://dx.doi.org/10.17085/apm.20078 |
_version_ | 1783647169791655936 |
---|---|
author | Bae, Geonhyeong Kim, Suyeon Lee, Sangseok Lee, Woo Yong Lim, Yunhee |
author_facet | Bae, Geonhyeong Kim, Suyeon Lee, Sangseok Lee, Woo Yong Lim, Yunhee |
author_sort | Bae, Geonhyeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prolotherapy, which stimulates the healing of loosened ligaments and tendons, is a cost-effective and safe treatment modality for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Its benefits may be affected by injection protocols, comparative regimens, and evaluation scales. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy as a long-term treatment for chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, KoreaMed, and KMbase databases were searched for studies published up to March 2019. We included randomized controlled trials which compared the effect of dextrose prolotherapy with that of other therapies such as exercise, saline, platelet-rich plasma, and steroid injection. The primary outcome was pain score change during daily life. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 750 participants were included in the final analysis. Pain scores from 6 months to 1 year after dextrose prolotherapy were significantly reduced compared to saline injection (standardized mean difference [SMD] –0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.76 to –0.11, P = 0.008) and exercise (SMD –0.42; 95% CI –0.77 to –0.07, P = 0.02). Prolotherapy yielded results similar to platelet-rich plasma or steroid injection, that it showed no significant difference in pain score. CONCLUSIONS: Dextrose prolotherapy is more effective in the treatment of chronic pain compared to saline injection or exercise. Its effect was comparable to that of platelet-rich plasma or steroid injection. Adequately powered, homogeneous, and longer-term trials are needed to better elucidate the efficacy of prolotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7861898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78618982021-02-10 Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis Bae, Geonhyeong Kim, Suyeon Lee, Sangseok Lee, Woo Yong Lim, Yunhee Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) Spinal Pain BACKGROUND: Prolotherapy, which stimulates the healing of loosened ligaments and tendons, is a cost-effective and safe treatment modality for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Its benefits may be affected by injection protocols, comparative regimens, and evaluation scales. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy as a long-term treatment for chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, KoreaMed, and KMbase databases were searched for studies published up to March 2019. We included randomized controlled trials which compared the effect of dextrose prolotherapy with that of other therapies such as exercise, saline, platelet-rich plasma, and steroid injection. The primary outcome was pain score change during daily life. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 750 participants were included in the final analysis. Pain scores from 6 months to 1 year after dextrose prolotherapy were significantly reduced compared to saline injection (standardized mean difference [SMD] –0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.76 to –0.11, P = 0.008) and exercise (SMD –0.42; 95% CI –0.77 to –0.07, P = 0.02). Prolotherapy yielded results similar to platelet-rich plasma or steroid injection, that it showed no significant difference in pain score. CONCLUSIONS: Dextrose prolotherapy is more effective in the treatment of chronic pain compared to saline injection or exercise. Its effect was comparable to that of platelet-rich plasma or steroid injection. Adequately powered, homogeneous, and longer-term trials are needed to better elucidate the efficacy of prolotherapy. Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2021-01-31 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7861898/ /pubmed/33348947 http://dx.doi.org/10.17085/apm.20078 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2021 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Spinal Pain Bae, Geonhyeong Kim, Suyeon Lee, Sangseok Lee, Woo Yong Lim, Yunhee Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Spinal Pain |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348947 http://dx.doi.org/10.17085/apm.20078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baegeonhyeong prolotherapyforthepatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimsuyeon prolotherapyforthepatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leesangseok prolotherapyforthepatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leewooyong prolotherapyforthepatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limyunhee prolotherapyforthepatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |