Cargando…

Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study

BACKGROUND: Interpreting health information and acquiring health knowledge have become more important with the accumulation of scientific medical knowledge and ideals of patient autonomy. Health literacy and its tremendous success as a concept can be considered an admission that not all is well in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulz, Peter Johannes, Pessina, Annalisa, Hartung, Uwe, Petrocchi, Serena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33475519
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20457
_version_ 1783647192068653056
author Schulz, Peter Johannes
Pessina, Annalisa
Hartung, Uwe
Petrocchi, Serena
author_facet Schulz, Peter Johannes
Pessina, Annalisa
Hartung, Uwe
Petrocchi, Serena
author_sort Schulz, Peter Johannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interpreting health information and acquiring health knowledge have become more important with the accumulation of scientific medical knowledge and ideals of patient autonomy. Health literacy and its tremendous success as a concept can be considered an admission that not all is well in the distribution of health knowledge. The internet makes health information much more easily accessible than ever, but it introduces its own problems, of which health disinformation is a major one. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether objective and subjective health literacy are independent concepts and to test which of the two was associated more strongly with accurate judgments of the quality of a medical website and with behavioral intentions beneficial to health. METHODS: A survey on depression and its treatments was conducted online (n=362). The Newest Vital Sign was employed to measure objective, performance-based health literacy, and the eHealth Literacy Scale was used to measure subjective, perception-based health literacy. Correlations, comparisons of means, linear and binary logistic regression, and mediation models were used to determine the associations. RESULTS: Objective and subjective health literacy were weakly associated with one another (r=0.06, P=.24). High objective health literacy levels were associated with an inclination to behave in ways that are beneficial to one’s own or others’ health (Exp[B]=2.068, P=.004) and an ability to recognize low-quality online sources of health information (β=–.4698, P=.005). The recognition also improved participants’ choice of treatment (β=–.3345, P<.001). Objective health literacy helped people to recognize misinformation on health websites and improved their judgment on their treatment for depression. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported, perception-based health literacy should be treated as a separate concept from objective, performance-based health literacy. Only objective health literacy appears to have the potential to prevent people from becoming victims of health disinformation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7861996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78619962021-02-10 Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study Schulz, Peter Johannes Pessina, Annalisa Hartung, Uwe Petrocchi, Serena J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Interpreting health information and acquiring health knowledge have become more important with the accumulation of scientific medical knowledge and ideals of patient autonomy. Health literacy and its tremendous success as a concept can be considered an admission that not all is well in the distribution of health knowledge. The internet makes health information much more easily accessible than ever, but it introduces its own problems, of which health disinformation is a major one. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether objective and subjective health literacy are independent concepts and to test which of the two was associated more strongly with accurate judgments of the quality of a medical website and with behavioral intentions beneficial to health. METHODS: A survey on depression and its treatments was conducted online (n=362). The Newest Vital Sign was employed to measure objective, performance-based health literacy, and the eHealth Literacy Scale was used to measure subjective, perception-based health literacy. Correlations, comparisons of means, linear and binary logistic regression, and mediation models were used to determine the associations. RESULTS: Objective and subjective health literacy were weakly associated with one another (r=0.06, P=.24). High objective health literacy levels were associated with an inclination to behave in ways that are beneficial to one’s own or others’ health (Exp[B]=2.068, P=.004) and an ability to recognize low-quality online sources of health information (β=–.4698, P=.005). The recognition also improved participants’ choice of treatment (β=–.3345, P<.001). Objective health literacy helped people to recognize misinformation on health websites and improved their judgment on their treatment for depression. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported, perception-based health literacy should be treated as a separate concept from objective, performance-based health literacy. Only objective health literacy appears to have the potential to prevent people from becoming victims of health disinformation. JMIR Publications 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7861996/ /pubmed/33475519 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20457 Text en ©Peter Johannes Schulz, Annalisa Pessina, Uwe Hartung, Serena Petrocchi. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.01.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Schulz, Peter Johannes
Pessina, Annalisa
Hartung, Uwe
Petrocchi, Serena
Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study
title Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study
title_full Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study
title_fullStr Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study
title_short Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study
title_sort effects of objective and subjective health literacy on patients’ accurate judgment of health information and decision-making ability: survey study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33475519
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20457
work_keys_str_mv AT schulzpeterjohannes effectsofobjectiveandsubjectivehealthliteracyonpatientsaccuratejudgmentofhealthinformationanddecisionmakingabilitysurveystudy
AT pessinaannalisa effectsofobjectiveandsubjectivehealthliteracyonpatientsaccuratejudgmentofhealthinformationanddecisionmakingabilitysurveystudy
AT hartunguwe effectsofobjectiveandsubjectivehealthliteracyonpatientsaccuratejudgmentofhealthinformationanddecisionmakingabilitysurveystudy
AT petrocchiserena effectsofobjectiveandsubjectivehealthliteracyonpatientsaccuratejudgmentofhealthinformationanddecisionmakingabilitysurveystudy