Cargando…

Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications

BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion is a versatile reconstructive technique providing well-vascularized local tissue. The current literature focuses largely on tissue expansion for breast reconstruction and in the context of burn and pediatric skin/soft tissue replacement; however, less traditional applica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langdell, Hannah C., Taskindoust, Mahsa, Levites, Heather A., Mateas, Catalin, Sergesketter, Amanda R., Kaplan, Samantha J., Marcus, Jeffrey R., Erdmann, Detlev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003378
_version_ 1783647208818606080
author Langdell, Hannah C.
Taskindoust, Mahsa
Levites, Heather A.
Mateas, Catalin
Sergesketter, Amanda R.
Kaplan, Samantha J.
Marcus, Jeffrey R.
Erdmann, Detlev
author_facet Langdell, Hannah C.
Taskindoust, Mahsa
Levites, Heather A.
Mateas, Catalin
Sergesketter, Amanda R.
Kaplan, Samantha J.
Marcus, Jeffrey R.
Erdmann, Detlev
author_sort Langdell, Hannah C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion is a versatile reconstructive technique providing well-vascularized local tissue. The current literature focuses largely on tissue expansion for breast reconstruction and in the context of burn and pediatric skin/soft tissue replacement; however, less traditional applications are also prevalent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the utilization of tissue expansion in such less well-characterized circumstances. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of all publications describing non-breast applications of tissue expansion. Variables regarding expander specifications, expansion process, and complications were collected and further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 565 publications were identified. Of these, 166 publications described tissue expansion for “less traditional” indications, which fell into 5 categories: ear reconstruction, cranioplasty, abdominal wall reconstruction, orthopedic procedures, and genital (penile/scrotal and vaginal/vulva) reconstruction. While lower extremity expansion is known to have high complication rates, tissue expander failure, infection, and exposure rates were in fact highest for penile/scrotal (failure: 18.5%; infection: 15.5%; exposure: 12.5%) and vaginal/vulva (failure: 20.6%; infection: 10.3%; exposure: 6.9%) reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue expansion enables index operations by providing additional skin before definitive reconstruction. Tissue expanders are a valuable option along the reconstructive ladder because they obviate the need for free tissue transfer. Although tissue expansion comes with inherent risk, aggregate outcome failures of the final reconstruction are similar to published rates of complications without pre-expansion. Thus, although tissue expansion requires a staged approach, it remains a valuable option in facilitating a variety of reconstructive procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7862073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78620732021-02-08 Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications Langdell, Hannah C. Taskindoust, Mahsa Levites, Heather A. Mateas, Catalin Sergesketter, Amanda R. Kaplan, Samantha J. Marcus, Jeffrey R. Erdmann, Detlev Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion is a versatile reconstructive technique providing well-vascularized local tissue. The current literature focuses largely on tissue expansion for breast reconstruction and in the context of burn and pediatric skin/soft tissue replacement; however, less traditional applications are also prevalent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the utilization of tissue expansion in such less well-characterized circumstances. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of all publications describing non-breast applications of tissue expansion. Variables regarding expander specifications, expansion process, and complications were collected and further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 565 publications were identified. Of these, 166 publications described tissue expansion for “less traditional” indications, which fell into 5 categories: ear reconstruction, cranioplasty, abdominal wall reconstruction, orthopedic procedures, and genital (penile/scrotal and vaginal/vulva) reconstruction. While lower extremity expansion is known to have high complication rates, tissue expander failure, infection, and exposure rates were in fact highest for penile/scrotal (failure: 18.5%; infection: 15.5%; exposure: 12.5%) and vaginal/vulva (failure: 20.6%; infection: 10.3%; exposure: 6.9%) reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue expansion enables index operations by providing additional skin before definitive reconstruction. Tissue expanders are a valuable option along the reconstructive ladder because they obviate the need for free tissue transfer. Although tissue expansion comes with inherent risk, aggregate outcome failures of the final reconstruction are similar to published rates of complications without pre-expansion. Thus, although tissue expansion requires a staged approach, it remains a valuable option in facilitating a variety of reconstructive procedures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7862073/ /pubmed/33564595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003378 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Langdell, Hannah C.
Taskindoust, Mahsa
Levites, Heather A.
Mateas, Catalin
Sergesketter, Amanda R.
Kaplan, Samantha J.
Marcus, Jeffrey R.
Erdmann, Detlev
Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications
title Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications
title_full Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications
title_short Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications
title_sort systematic review of tissue expansion: utilization in non-breast applications
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003378
work_keys_str_mv AT langdellhannahc systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications
AT taskindoustmahsa systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications
AT levitesheathera systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications
AT mateascatalin systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications
AT sergesketteramandar systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications
AT kaplansamanthaj systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications
AT marcusjeffreyr systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications
AT erdmanndetlev systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications