Cargando…
Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications
BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion is a versatile reconstructive technique providing well-vascularized local tissue. The current literature focuses largely on tissue expansion for breast reconstruction and in the context of burn and pediatric skin/soft tissue replacement; however, less traditional applica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003378 |
_version_ | 1783647208818606080 |
---|---|
author | Langdell, Hannah C. Taskindoust, Mahsa Levites, Heather A. Mateas, Catalin Sergesketter, Amanda R. Kaplan, Samantha J. Marcus, Jeffrey R. Erdmann, Detlev |
author_facet | Langdell, Hannah C. Taskindoust, Mahsa Levites, Heather A. Mateas, Catalin Sergesketter, Amanda R. Kaplan, Samantha J. Marcus, Jeffrey R. Erdmann, Detlev |
author_sort | Langdell, Hannah C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion is a versatile reconstructive technique providing well-vascularized local tissue. The current literature focuses largely on tissue expansion for breast reconstruction and in the context of burn and pediatric skin/soft tissue replacement; however, less traditional applications are also prevalent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the utilization of tissue expansion in such less well-characterized circumstances. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of all publications describing non-breast applications of tissue expansion. Variables regarding expander specifications, expansion process, and complications were collected and further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 565 publications were identified. Of these, 166 publications described tissue expansion for “less traditional” indications, which fell into 5 categories: ear reconstruction, cranioplasty, abdominal wall reconstruction, orthopedic procedures, and genital (penile/scrotal and vaginal/vulva) reconstruction. While lower extremity expansion is known to have high complication rates, tissue expander failure, infection, and exposure rates were in fact highest for penile/scrotal (failure: 18.5%; infection: 15.5%; exposure: 12.5%) and vaginal/vulva (failure: 20.6%; infection: 10.3%; exposure: 6.9%) reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue expansion enables index operations by providing additional skin before definitive reconstruction. Tissue expanders are a valuable option along the reconstructive ladder because they obviate the need for free tissue transfer. Although tissue expansion comes with inherent risk, aggregate outcome failures of the final reconstruction are similar to published rates of complications without pre-expansion. Thus, although tissue expansion requires a staged approach, it remains a valuable option in facilitating a variety of reconstructive procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7862073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78620732021-02-08 Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications Langdell, Hannah C. Taskindoust, Mahsa Levites, Heather A. Mateas, Catalin Sergesketter, Amanda R. Kaplan, Samantha J. Marcus, Jeffrey R. Erdmann, Detlev Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion is a versatile reconstructive technique providing well-vascularized local tissue. The current literature focuses largely on tissue expansion for breast reconstruction and in the context of burn and pediatric skin/soft tissue replacement; however, less traditional applications are also prevalent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the utilization of tissue expansion in such less well-characterized circumstances. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of all publications describing non-breast applications of tissue expansion. Variables regarding expander specifications, expansion process, and complications were collected and further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 565 publications were identified. Of these, 166 publications described tissue expansion for “less traditional” indications, which fell into 5 categories: ear reconstruction, cranioplasty, abdominal wall reconstruction, orthopedic procedures, and genital (penile/scrotal and vaginal/vulva) reconstruction. While lower extremity expansion is known to have high complication rates, tissue expander failure, infection, and exposure rates were in fact highest for penile/scrotal (failure: 18.5%; infection: 15.5%; exposure: 12.5%) and vaginal/vulva (failure: 20.6%; infection: 10.3%; exposure: 6.9%) reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue expansion enables index operations by providing additional skin before definitive reconstruction. Tissue expanders are a valuable option along the reconstructive ladder because they obviate the need for free tissue transfer. Although tissue expansion comes with inherent risk, aggregate outcome failures of the final reconstruction are similar to published rates of complications without pre-expansion. Thus, although tissue expansion requires a staged approach, it remains a valuable option in facilitating a variety of reconstructive procedures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7862073/ /pubmed/33564595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003378 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Langdell, Hannah C. Taskindoust, Mahsa Levites, Heather A. Mateas, Catalin Sergesketter, Amanda R. Kaplan, Samantha J. Marcus, Jeffrey R. Erdmann, Detlev Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications |
title | Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications |
title_full | Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications |
title_short | Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications |
title_sort | systematic review of tissue expansion: utilization in non-breast applications |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langdellhannahc systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications AT taskindoustmahsa systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications AT levitesheathera systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications AT mateascatalin systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications AT sergesketteramandar systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications AT kaplansamanthaj systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications AT marcusjeffreyr systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications AT erdmanndetlev systematicreviewoftissueexpansionutilizationinnonbreastapplications |