Cargando…

Per Pedicel‐Ligament Flavum Tunnel Outside‐In Foraminoplasty for T(10)–T(12) Discectomy under a Percutaneous Endoscope

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effectiveness of T(10)–T(12) discectomy and per pedicel‐ligament flavum tunnel outside‐in foraminoplasty protocols under percutaneous endoscope. METHODS: This retrospective study from September 2017 to June 2019 comprised 10 patients (mean age was 64.7 years, with 7 men an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Wei, Liu, Wei, Ma, Wen‐ting, Xue, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12916
_version_ 1783647225721651200
author Lin, Wei
Liu, Wei
Ma, Wen‐ting
Xue, Yuan
author_facet Lin, Wei
Liu, Wei
Ma, Wen‐ting
Xue, Yuan
author_sort Lin, Wei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the effectiveness of T(10)–T(12) discectomy and per pedicel‐ligament flavum tunnel outside‐in foraminoplasty protocols under percutaneous endoscope. METHODS: This retrospective study from September 2017 to June 2019 comprised 10 patients (mean age was 64.7 years, with 7 men and 3 women) with symptomatic thoracic disc herniation. Patients who had 12 months of follow‐up and no cervical and lumbar spine surgery or trauma during the follow up period were included in the study. Patients underwent surgery at different levels: 3 patients for T(10)–T(11) and 7 patients for T(11)–T(12). Percutaneous endoscopic thoracic discectomy was performed following under‐vision foraminoplasty, which was based on lower pedicel‐ligament flavum tunnel detection. Patients who presented with symptomatic soft disc herniation of the thoracic spine and did not respond to conservative treatments were included. Patients with calcified disc herniation or concomitant ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were excluded. The surgery involves four steps: (i) facet joint reaching procedures; (ii) sliding the working sleeve caudally to attach the pedicel, rotating the scope to detect the lower border of the superior articular process, the pedicel, and the lower pedicel‐ligamentum flavum tunnel (PEFT) under vision, respectively; (iii) milling the superior articular process under vision; and (iv) finding and removing the disc protrusion after the posterior longitudinal ligament is resected. Patient outcomes were evaluated using vision analog scale scores, Oswestry disability index scores, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. The VAS scores, Oswestry disability index scores, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores before and after the operation were compared by t‐test for statistical analysis. MRI, CT, and plain X‐rays were performed in of all the patients before and after surgery. RESULTS: The patient was usually able to stand and walk approximately 2 h after the surgery. During the 12‐month follow‐up, all patients showed a significant improvement in pain. Postoperative thoracic MRI examination of all patients showed full decompression of the spinal cord and no residual pressure. Postoperative back pain and nerve root pain were significantly alleviated in all patients, and spinal cord function was significantly restored. The mean visual analog scale scores of patients postoperation were significantly better than those of patients preoperation (6.10 ± 1.37 vs 1.80 ± 0.79, P < 0.05). The mean ODI scores of patients postoperation were better than those of patients preoperation (13% ± 2.36% vs 55% ± 9.20%, P < 0.05). The mean JOA scores increased from 3.2 ± 0.75 to 9.3 ± 0.64. The JOA improvement rate was 79.6% ± 5.1%. There was 1 patient who had transient intercostal neuralgia. CONCLUSION: Following pedicel‐ligament flavum tunnel outside‐in foraminoplasty protocols, T(10)–T(12) discectomy is relatively safe when conducted under percutaneous endoscope.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7862147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78621472021-02-16 Per Pedicel‐Ligament Flavum Tunnel Outside‐In Foraminoplasty for T(10)–T(12) Discectomy under a Percutaneous Endoscope Lin, Wei Liu, Wei Ma, Wen‐ting Xue, Yuan Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To describe the effectiveness of T(10)–T(12) discectomy and per pedicel‐ligament flavum tunnel outside‐in foraminoplasty protocols under percutaneous endoscope. METHODS: This retrospective study from September 2017 to June 2019 comprised 10 patients (mean age was 64.7 years, with 7 men and 3 women) with symptomatic thoracic disc herniation. Patients who had 12 months of follow‐up and no cervical and lumbar spine surgery or trauma during the follow up period were included in the study. Patients underwent surgery at different levels: 3 patients for T(10)–T(11) and 7 patients for T(11)–T(12). Percutaneous endoscopic thoracic discectomy was performed following under‐vision foraminoplasty, which was based on lower pedicel‐ligament flavum tunnel detection. Patients who presented with symptomatic soft disc herniation of the thoracic spine and did not respond to conservative treatments were included. Patients with calcified disc herniation or concomitant ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were excluded. The surgery involves four steps: (i) facet joint reaching procedures; (ii) sliding the working sleeve caudally to attach the pedicel, rotating the scope to detect the lower border of the superior articular process, the pedicel, and the lower pedicel‐ligamentum flavum tunnel (PEFT) under vision, respectively; (iii) milling the superior articular process under vision; and (iv) finding and removing the disc protrusion after the posterior longitudinal ligament is resected. Patient outcomes were evaluated using vision analog scale scores, Oswestry disability index scores, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. The VAS scores, Oswestry disability index scores, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores before and after the operation were compared by t‐test for statistical analysis. MRI, CT, and plain X‐rays were performed in of all the patients before and after surgery. RESULTS: The patient was usually able to stand and walk approximately 2 h after the surgery. During the 12‐month follow‐up, all patients showed a significant improvement in pain. Postoperative thoracic MRI examination of all patients showed full decompression of the spinal cord and no residual pressure. Postoperative back pain and nerve root pain were significantly alleviated in all patients, and spinal cord function was significantly restored. The mean visual analog scale scores of patients postoperation were significantly better than those of patients preoperation (6.10 ± 1.37 vs 1.80 ± 0.79, P < 0.05). The mean ODI scores of patients postoperation were better than those of patients preoperation (13% ± 2.36% vs 55% ± 9.20%, P < 0.05). The mean JOA scores increased from 3.2 ± 0.75 to 9.3 ± 0.64. The JOA improvement rate was 79.6% ± 5.1%. There was 1 patient who had transient intercostal neuralgia. CONCLUSION: Following pedicel‐ligament flavum tunnel outside‐in foraminoplasty protocols, T(10)–T(12) discectomy is relatively safe when conducted under percutaneous endoscope. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7862147/ /pubmed/33410235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12916 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Lin, Wei
Liu, Wei
Ma, Wen‐ting
Xue, Yuan
Per Pedicel‐Ligament Flavum Tunnel Outside‐In Foraminoplasty for T(10)–T(12) Discectomy under a Percutaneous Endoscope
title Per Pedicel‐Ligament Flavum Tunnel Outside‐In Foraminoplasty for T(10)–T(12) Discectomy under a Percutaneous Endoscope
title_full Per Pedicel‐Ligament Flavum Tunnel Outside‐In Foraminoplasty for T(10)–T(12) Discectomy under a Percutaneous Endoscope
title_fullStr Per Pedicel‐Ligament Flavum Tunnel Outside‐In Foraminoplasty for T(10)–T(12) Discectomy under a Percutaneous Endoscope
title_full_unstemmed Per Pedicel‐Ligament Flavum Tunnel Outside‐In Foraminoplasty for T(10)–T(12) Discectomy under a Percutaneous Endoscope
title_short Per Pedicel‐Ligament Flavum Tunnel Outside‐In Foraminoplasty for T(10)–T(12) Discectomy under a Percutaneous Endoscope
title_sort per pedicel‐ligament flavum tunnel outside‐in foraminoplasty for t(10)–t(12) discectomy under a percutaneous endoscope
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12916
work_keys_str_mv AT linwei perpedicelligamentflavumtunneloutsideinforaminoplastyfort10t12discectomyunderapercutaneousendoscope
AT liuwei perpedicelligamentflavumtunneloutsideinforaminoplastyfort10t12discectomyunderapercutaneousendoscope
AT mawenting perpedicelligamentflavumtunneloutsideinforaminoplastyfort10t12discectomyunderapercutaneousendoscope
AT xueyuan perpedicelligamentflavumtunneloutsideinforaminoplastyfort10t12discectomyunderapercutaneousendoscope