Cargando…

Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes of humeral head replacement in the treatment of patients with comminuted proximal humeral fracture. METHODS: Between February 2013 and September 2016, 56 patients underwent humeral head replacement in our hospital. Of them, 18 cases were diagnosed as comminuted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xinghuo, Zhang, Yakui, Guo, Tao, Liu, Liang, Cheng, Wenhao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12732
_version_ 1783647234317877248
author Zhang, Xinghuo
Zhang, Yakui
Guo, Tao
Liu, Liang
Cheng, Wenhao
author_facet Zhang, Xinghuo
Zhang, Yakui
Guo, Tao
Liu, Liang
Cheng, Wenhao
author_sort Zhang, Xinghuo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes of humeral head replacement in the treatment of patients with comminuted proximal humeral fracture. METHODS: Between February 2013 and September 2016, 56 patients underwent humeral head replacement in our hospital. Of them, 18 cases were diagnosed as comminuted proximal humeral fracture before the operation. The mean age of the patients was 69.5 years old (ranging from 61 to 79 years old). Of them, there were six males and 12 females. All the patients in this group had fresh fractures. They were all treated by artificial humeral head replacements. After the prosthesis was fixed by bone cement reliably, the greater or lesser trochanter and prosthesis handle were sutured and fixed firmly. The interval time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 5 days. The Constant Functional Score, operation time, blood loss, nerve injury, joint dislocation rate, and infection rate were recorded at the final follow‐up. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively studied. All of the data were recorded in average form. RESULTS: In this study, the mean duration of follow‐up was 4 years, ranging from 3 to 6 years. The operation time ranged from 75 to 120 min, with the average of 82 min. The blood loss ranged from 100 to 400 mL, with the average of 210 mL. The mean score of Constant Functional Score was 83.5 ± 3.1. Of them, 14 cases achieved excellent and good (scores of more than 80), and four cases achieved moderate and poor (scores of less than 80). No patient suffered from joint dislocation, unstable joint, or infection after the operation. There were two patients with axillary nerve injury before the operation. However, the function could be recovered within 3–6 weeks after the surgery. CONCLUSION: The artificial humeral head replacement could be applied for the treatment of patients with comminuted proximal humeral fracture. During the surgery process, the stable structure of shoulder joint could be completely restructured, and the rehabilitation plan should be adjusted reasonably and timely after the operation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7862184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78621842021-02-16 Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture Zhang, Xinghuo Zhang, Yakui Guo, Tao Liu, Liang Cheng, Wenhao Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes of humeral head replacement in the treatment of patients with comminuted proximal humeral fracture. METHODS: Between February 2013 and September 2016, 56 patients underwent humeral head replacement in our hospital. Of them, 18 cases were diagnosed as comminuted proximal humeral fracture before the operation. The mean age of the patients was 69.5 years old (ranging from 61 to 79 years old). Of them, there were six males and 12 females. All the patients in this group had fresh fractures. They were all treated by artificial humeral head replacements. After the prosthesis was fixed by bone cement reliably, the greater or lesser trochanter and prosthesis handle were sutured and fixed firmly. The interval time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 5 days. The Constant Functional Score, operation time, blood loss, nerve injury, joint dislocation rate, and infection rate were recorded at the final follow‐up. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively studied. All of the data were recorded in average form. RESULTS: In this study, the mean duration of follow‐up was 4 years, ranging from 3 to 6 years. The operation time ranged from 75 to 120 min, with the average of 82 min. The blood loss ranged from 100 to 400 mL, with the average of 210 mL. The mean score of Constant Functional Score was 83.5 ± 3.1. Of them, 14 cases achieved excellent and good (scores of more than 80), and four cases achieved moderate and poor (scores of less than 80). No patient suffered from joint dislocation, unstable joint, or infection after the operation. There were two patients with axillary nerve injury before the operation. However, the function could be recovered within 3–6 weeks after the surgery. CONCLUSION: The artificial humeral head replacement could be applied for the treatment of patients with comminuted proximal humeral fracture. During the surgery process, the stable structure of shoulder joint could be completely restructured, and the rehabilitation plan should be adjusted reasonably and timely after the operation. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7862184/ /pubmed/33403829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12732 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Zhang, Xinghuo
Zhang, Yakui
Guo, Tao
Liu, Liang
Cheng, Wenhao
Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture
title Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture
title_full Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture
title_fullStr Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture
title_full_unstemmed Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture
title_short Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture
title_sort humeral head replacement in the treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fracture
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12732
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxinghuo humeralheadreplacementinthetreatmentofcomminutedproximalhumeralfracture
AT zhangyakui humeralheadreplacementinthetreatmentofcomminutedproximalhumeralfracture
AT guotao humeralheadreplacementinthetreatmentofcomminutedproximalhumeralfracture
AT liuliang humeralheadreplacementinthetreatmentofcomminutedproximalhumeralfracture
AT chengwenhao humeralheadreplacementinthetreatmentofcomminutedproximalhumeralfracture