Cargando…

Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations

PURPOSE: An age-related decline in anticipatory postural mechanisms has been reported during gait initiation; however, it is unclear whether such decline may jeopardize whole-body stability following unexpected balance perturbations. This study aimed to compare young and older individuals’ ability t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laudani, Luca, Rum, Lorenzo, Valle, Maria Stella, Macaluso, Andrea, Vannozzi, Giuseppe, Casabona, Antonino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33106932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04531-1
_version_ 1783647238156713984
author Laudani, Luca
Rum, Lorenzo
Valle, Maria Stella
Macaluso, Andrea
Vannozzi, Giuseppe
Casabona, Antonino
author_facet Laudani, Luca
Rum, Lorenzo
Valle, Maria Stella
Macaluso, Andrea
Vannozzi, Giuseppe
Casabona, Antonino
author_sort Laudani, Luca
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: An age-related decline in anticipatory postural mechanisms has been reported during gait initiation; however, it is unclear whether such decline may jeopardize whole-body stability following unexpected balance perturbations. This study aimed to compare young and older individuals’ ability to generate postural responses and preserve stability in response to external waist perturbations delivered within gait initiation. METHODS: Ten young and ten older participants performed 10 gait initiation trials followed by 48 unperturbed and 12 perturbed trials in a random order. A stereophotogrammetric system and three force platforms were used to quantify mechanical parameters from the preparatory phase (e.g., timing and amplitude of postural adjustments) and from the stepping phase (e.g., step characteristics and dynamic stability). Activation patterns of lower leg muscles were determined by surface electromyography. RESULTS: Older participants responded to perturbation with lower increase in both magnitude (p < 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.62) and duration (p = 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.39) of preparatory parameters and soleus muscle activity (p < 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.55), causing shorter (p < 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.59) and lower (p < 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.43) stepping, compared to young participants. Interestingly, young participants showed greater correlations between preparatory phase parameters and dynamic stability of the first step than older participants (average r of − 0.40 and − 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that young participants took more time than older to adjust the anticipatory biomechanical response to perturbation attempting to preserve balance during stepping. In contrast, older adults were unable to modify their anticipatory adjustments in response to perturbation and mainly relied on compensatory mechanisms attempting to preserve stability via a more cautious stepping strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7862204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78622042021-02-11 Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations Laudani, Luca Rum, Lorenzo Valle, Maria Stella Macaluso, Andrea Vannozzi, Giuseppe Casabona, Antonino Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: An age-related decline in anticipatory postural mechanisms has been reported during gait initiation; however, it is unclear whether such decline may jeopardize whole-body stability following unexpected balance perturbations. This study aimed to compare young and older individuals’ ability to generate postural responses and preserve stability in response to external waist perturbations delivered within gait initiation. METHODS: Ten young and ten older participants performed 10 gait initiation trials followed by 48 unperturbed and 12 perturbed trials in a random order. A stereophotogrammetric system and three force platforms were used to quantify mechanical parameters from the preparatory phase (e.g., timing and amplitude of postural adjustments) and from the stepping phase (e.g., step characteristics and dynamic stability). Activation patterns of lower leg muscles were determined by surface electromyography. RESULTS: Older participants responded to perturbation with lower increase in both magnitude (p < 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.62) and duration (p = 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.39) of preparatory parameters and soleus muscle activity (p < 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.55), causing shorter (p < 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.59) and lower (p < 0.001; η(2)(p) = 0.43) stepping, compared to young participants. Interestingly, young participants showed greater correlations between preparatory phase parameters and dynamic stability of the first step than older participants (average r of − 0.40 and − 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that young participants took more time than older to adjust the anticipatory biomechanical response to perturbation attempting to preserve balance during stepping. In contrast, older adults were unable to modify their anticipatory adjustments in response to perturbation and mainly relied on compensatory mechanisms attempting to preserve stability via a more cautious stepping strategy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7862204/ /pubmed/33106932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04531-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Laudani, Luca
Rum, Lorenzo
Valle, Maria Stella
Macaluso, Andrea
Vannozzi, Giuseppe
Casabona, Antonino
Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations
title Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations
title_full Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations
title_fullStr Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations
title_full_unstemmed Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations
title_short Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations
title_sort age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33106932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04531-1
work_keys_str_mv AT laudaniluca agedifferencesinanticipatoryandexecutorymechanismsofgaitinitiationfollowingunexpectedbalanceperturbations
AT rumlorenzo agedifferencesinanticipatoryandexecutorymechanismsofgaitinitiationfollowingunexpectedbalanceperturbations
AT vallemariastella agedifferencesinanticipatoryandexecutorymechanismsofgaitinitiationfollowingunexpectedbalanceperturbations
AT macalusoandrea agedifferencesinanticipatoryandexecutorymechanismsofgaitinitiationfollowingunexpectedbalanceperturbations
AT vannozzigiuseppe agedifferencesinanticipatoryandexecutorymechanismsofgaitinitiationfollowingunexpectedbalanceperturbations
AT casabonaantonino agedifferencesinanticipatoryandexecutorymechanismsofgaitinitiationfollowingunexpectedbalanceperturbations