Cargando…
Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication
Inadvertent cues can be refined into signals through coevolution between signalers and receivers, yet the earliest steps in this process remain elusive. In Hawaiian populations of the Pacific field cricket, a new morph producing a novel and incredibly variable song (purring) has spread across island...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33542210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20971-5 |
_version_ | 1783647275197661184 |
---|---|
author | Tinghitella, Robin M. Broder, E. Dale Gallagher, James H. Wikle, Aaron W. Zonana, David M. |
author_facet | Tinghitella, Robin M. Broder, E. Dale Gallagher, James H. Wikle, Aaron W. Zonana, David M. |
author_sort | Tinghitella, Robin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inadvertent cues can be refined into signals through coevolution between signalers and receivers, yet the earliest steps in this process remain elusive. In Hawaiian populations of the Pacific field cricket, a new morph producing a novel and incredibly variable song (purring) has spread across islands. Here we characterize the current sexual and natural selection landscape acting on the novel signal by (1) determining fitness advantages of purring through attraction to mates and protection from a prominent deadly natural enemy, and (2) testing alternative hypotheses about the strength and form of selection acting on the novel signal. In field studies, female crickets respond positively to purrs, but eavesdropping parasitoid flies do not, suggesting purring may allow private communication among crickets. Contrary to the sensory bias and preference for novelty hypotheses, preference functions (selective pressure) are nearly flat, driven by extreme inter-individual variation in function shape. Our study offers a rare empirical test of the roles of natural and sexual selection in the earliest stages of signal evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7862365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78623652021-02-16 Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication Tinghitella, Robin M. Broder, E. Dale Gallagher, James H. Wikle, Aaron W. Zonana, David M. Nat Commun Article Inadvertent cues can be refined into signals through coevolution between signalers and receivers, yet the earliest steps in this process remain elusive. In Hawaiian populations of the Pacific field cricket, a new morph producing a novel and incredibly variable song (purring) has spread across islands. Here we characterize the current sexual and natural selection landscape acting on the novel signal by (1) determining fitness advantages of purring through attraction to mates and protection from a prominent deadly natural enemy, and (2) testing alternative hypotheses about the strength and form of selection acting on the novel signal. In field studies, female crickets respond positively to purrs, but eavesdropping parasitoid flies do not, suggesting purring may allow private communication among crickets. Contrary to the sensory bias and preference for novelty hypotheses, preference functions (selective pressure) are nearly flat, driven by extreme inter-individual variation in function shape. Our study offers a rare empirical test of the roles of natural and sexual selection in the earliest stages of signal evolution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7862365/ /pubmed/33542210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20971-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tinghitella, Robin M. Broder, E. Dale Gallagher, James H. Wikle, Aaron W. Zonana, David M. Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication |
title | Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication |
title_full | Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication |
title_fullStr | Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication |
title_full_unstemmed | Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication |
title_short | Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication |
title_sort | responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33542210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20971-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tinghitellarobinm responsesofintendedandunintendedreceiverstoanovelsexualsignalsuggestclandestinecommunication AT broderedale responsesofintendedandunintendedreceiverstoanovelsexualsignalsuggestclandestinecommunication AT gallagherjamesh responsesofintendedandunintendedreceiverstoanovelsexualsignalsuggestclandestinecommunication AT wikleaaronw responsesofintendedandunintendedreceiverstoanovelsexualsignalsuggestclandestinecommunication AT zonanadavidm responsesofintendedandunintendedreceiverstoanovelsexualsignalsuggestclandestinecommunication |