Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II Studies

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in treating eccentric calcified coronary lesions. METHODS: Between December 2015 and March 2019, 180 patients were enrolled in the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II studies across 19 sites in 10 co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blachutzik, Florian, Honton, Benjamin, Escaned, Javier, Hill, Jonathan M., Werner, Nikos, Banning, Adrian P., Lansky, Alexandra J., Schlattner, Sophia, De Bruyne, Bernard, Di Mario, Carlo, Dörr, Oliver, Hamm, Christian, Nef, Holger M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01737-3
_version_ 1783647298670034944
author Blachutzik, Florian
Honton, Benjamin
Escaned, Javier
Hill, Jonathan M.
Werner, Nikos
Banning, Adrian P.
Lansky, Alexandra J.
Schlattner, Sophia
De Bruyne, Bernard
Di Mario, Carlo
Dörr, Oliver
Hamm, Christian
Nef, Holger M.
author_facet Blachutzik, Florian
Honton, Benjamin
Escaned, Javier
Hill, Jonathan M.
Werner, Nikos
Banning, Adrian P.
Lansky, Alexandra J.
Schlattner, Sophia
De Bruyne, Bernard
Di Mario, Carlo
Dörr, Oliver
Hamm, Christian
Nef, Holger M.
author_sort Blachutzik, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in treating eccentric calcified coronary lesions. METHODS: Between December 2015 and March 2019, 180 patients were enrolled in the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II studies across 19 sites in 10 countries. Patient-level data were pooled from these two studies (n = 180), within which 47 eccentric lesions (26%) and 133 concentric lesions were identified. RESULTS: Clinical success, defined as residual stenosis < 50% after stenting and no in-hospital MACE, was similar between the eccentric and concentric cohorts (93.6% vs. 93.2%, p = 1.0). There were no perforations, abrupt closure, slow flow or no reflow events observed in either group, and there were low rates of flow-limiting dissections (Grade D–F: 0% eccentric, 1.7% concentric; p = 0.54). Final acute gain and percent residual stenosis were similar between the two groups. Final residual stenosis of 8.6 ± 9.8% in eccentric and 10.0 ± 9.0% (p = 0.56) in concentric stenosis confirms the significant effect of IVL in calcified coronary lesions. CONCLUSION: In this first report from a pooled patient-level analysis of coronary IVL from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II studies, IVL use was associated with consistent improvement in procedural and clinical outcomes in both eccentric and concentric calcified lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7862504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78625042021-02-16 Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II Studies Blachutzik, Florian Honton, Benjamin Escaned, Javier Hill, Jonathan M. Werner, Nikos Banning, Adrian P. Lansky, Alexandra J. Schlattner, Sophia De Bruyne, Bernard Di Mario, Carlo Dörr, Oliver Hamm, Christian Nef, Holger M. Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in treating eccentric calcified coronary lesions. METHODS: Between December 2015 and March 2019, 180 patients were enrolled in the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II studies across 19 sites in 10 countries. Patient-level data were pooled from these two studies (n = 180), within which 47 eccentric lesions (26%) and 133 concentric lesions were identified. RESULTS: Clinical success, defined as residual stenosis < 50% after stenting and no in-hospital MACE, was similar between the eccentric and concentric cohorts (93.6% vs. 93.2%, p = 1.0). There were no perforations, abrupt closure, slow flow or no reflow events observed in either group, and there were low rates of flow-limiting dissections (Grade D–F: 0% eccentric, 1.7% concentric; p = 0.54). Final acute gain and percent residual stenosis were similar between the two groups. Final residual stenosis of 8.6 ± 9.8% in eccentric and 10.0 ± 9.0% (p = 0.56) in concentric stenosis confirms the significant effect of IVL in calcified coronary lesions. CONCLUSION: In this first report from a pooled patient-level analysis of coronary IVL from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II studies, IVL use was associated with consistent improvement in procedural and clinical outcomes in both eccentric and concentric calcified lesions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7862504/ /pubmed/32948882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01737-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Blachutzik, Florian
Honton, Benjamin
Escaned, Javier
Hill, Jonathan M.
Werner, Nikos
Banning, Adrian P.
Lansky, Alexandra J.
Schlattner, Sophia
De Bruyne, Bernard
Di Mario, Carlo
Dörr, Oliver
Hamm, Christian
Nef, Holger M.
Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II Studies
title Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II Studies
title_full Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II Studies
title_fullStr Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II Studies
title_full_unstemmed Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II Studies
title_short Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the Disrupt CAD I and CAD II Studies
title_sort safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the disrupt cad i and cad ii studies
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01737-3
work_keys_str_mv AT blachutzikflorian safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT hontonbenjamin safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT escanedjavier safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT hilljonathanm safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT wernernikos safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT banningadrianp safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT lanskyalexandraj safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT schlattnersophia safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT debruynebernard safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT dimariocarlo safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT dorroliver safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT hammchristian safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies
AT nefholgerm safetyandeffectivenessofcoronaryintravascularlithotripsyineccentriccalcifiedcoronarylesionsapatientlevelpooledanalysisfromthedisruptcadiandcadiistudies