Cargando…
Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
BACKGROUND: The effect of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization on survival remains controversial. Furthermore, data regarding outcome differences for CTO revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) are limited. The differential outcomes from CTO revascularization...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32880002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2 |
_version_ | 1783647299167059968 |
---|---|
author | Kook, Hyungdon Yang, Jeong Hoon Cho, Jae Young Jang, Duck Hyun Kim, Min Sun Lee, Juneyoung Lee, Seung Hun Joo, Hyung Joon Park, Jae Hyoung Hong, Soon Jun Kim, Je Sang Lee, Hyun Jong Choi, Rak Kyeong Choi, Young Jin Park, Jin Sik Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin-Ho Hahn, Joo-Yong Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol Lim, Do-Sun Choi, Seung-Hyuk Yu, Cheol Woong |
author_facet | Kook, Hyungdon Yang, Jeong Hoon Cho, Jae Young Jang, Duck Hyun Kim, Min Sun Lee, Juneyoung Lee, Seung Hun Joo, Hyung Joon Park, Jae Hyoung Hong, Soon Jun Kim, Je Sang Lee, Hyun Jong Choi, Rak Kyeong Choi, Young Jin Park, Jin Sik Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin-Ho Hahn, Joo-Yong Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol Lim, Do-Sun Choi, Seung-Hyuk Yu, Cheol Woong |
author_sort | Kook, Hyungdon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effect of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization on survival remains controversial. Furthermore, data regarding outcome differences for CTO revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) are limited. The differential outcomes from CTO revascularization in patients with preserved LVSF (PLVSF) versus reduced LVSF (RLVSF) were assessed. METHODS: A total of 2,173 CTO patients were divided into either a PLVSF (n = 1661, Ejection fraction ≥ 50%) or RLVSF (n = 512, < 50%) group. Clinical outcomes were compared between successful CTO revascularization (SCR) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) within each group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for endpoint analysis and a contrast test for comparison of survival probability differences according to LVSF were used. RESULTS: Patients with RLVSF had a mean 37% ejection fraction (EF) and 19% had EF < 30%. The median follow-up duration was 1,138 days. Regardless of LVSF, the primary endpoint incidence was significantly lower in patients treated with SCR [RLVSF: 29.7% vs. 49.7%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.62, p < 0.0001; PLVSF 7.3% vs. 16.9%, HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54–0.93, p = 0.0019], which was mainly driven by a reduction in cardiac death. The difference in survival probability was greater and became more pronounced over time in patients with RLVSF than with PLVSF (1-year, p = 0.197; 3-years, p = 0.048; 5-years, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: SCR was associated with better survival benefit than OMT regardless of LVSF. The benefit was greater and became more significant over time in patients with RLVSF versus PLVSF. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7862506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78625062021-02-16 Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function Kook, Hyungdon Yang, Jeong Hoon Cho, Jae Young Jang, Duck Hyun Kim, Min Sun Lee, Juneyoung Lee, Seung Hun Joo, Hyung Joon Park, Jae Hyoung Hong, Soon Jun Kim, Je Sang Lee, Hyun Jong Choi, Rak Kyeong Choi, Young Jin Park, Jin Sik Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin-Ho Hahn, Joo-Yong Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol Lim, Do-Sun Choi, Seung-Hyuk Yu, Cheol Woong Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: The effect of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization on survival remains controversial. Furthermore, data regarding outcome differences for CTO revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) are limited. The differential outcomes from CTO revascularization in patients with preserved LVSF (PLVSF) versus reduced LVSF (RLVSF) were assessed. METHODS: A total of 2,173 CTO patients were divided into either a PLVSF (n = 1661, Ejection fraction ≥ 50%) or RLVSF (n = 512, < 50%) group. Clinical outcomes were compared between successful CTO revascularization (SCR) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) within each group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for endpoint analysis and a contrast test for comparison of survival probability differences according to LVSF were used. RESULTS: Patients with RLVSF had a mean 37% ejection fraction (EF) and 19% had EF < 30%. The median follow-up duration was 1,138 days. Regardless of LVSF, the primary endpoint incidence was significantly lower in patients treated with SCR [RLVSF: 29.7% vs. 49.7%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.62, p < 0.0001; PLVSF 7.3% vs. 16.9%, HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54–0.93, p = 0.0019], which was mainly driven by a reduction in cardiac death. The difference in survival probability was greater and became more pronounced over time in patients with RLVSF than with PLVSF (1-year, p = 0.197; 3-years, p = 0.048; 5-years, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: SCR was associated with better survival benefit than OMT regardless of LVSF. The benefit was greater and became more significant over time in patients with RLVSF versus PLVSF. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7862506/ /pubmed/32880002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kook, Hyungdon Yang, Jeong Hoon Cho, Jae Young Jang, Duck Hyun Kim, Min Sun Lee, Juneyoung Lee, Seung Hun Joo, Hyung Joon Park, Jae Hyoung Hong, Soon Jun Kim, Je Sang Lee, Hyun Jong Choi, Rak Kyeong Choi, Young Jin Park, Jin Sik Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin-Ho Hahn, Joo-Yong Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol Lim, Do-Sun Choi, Seung-Hyuk Yu, Cheol Woong Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function |
title | Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function |
title_full | Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function |
title_fullStr | Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function |
title_short | Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function |
title_sort | differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32880002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kookhyungdon differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT yangjeonghoon differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT chojaeyoung differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT jangduckhyun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT kimminsun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT leejuneyoung differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT leeseunghun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT joohyungjoon differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT parkjaehyoung differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT hongsoonjun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT kimjesang differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT leehyunjong differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT choirakkyeong differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT choiyoungjin differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT parkjinsik differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT songyoungbin differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT choijinho differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT hahnjooyong differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT gwonhyeoncheol differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT limdosun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT choiseunghyuk differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction AT yucheolwoong differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction |