Cargando…

Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function

BACKGROUND: The effect of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization on survival remains controversial. Furthermore, data regarding outcome differences for CTO revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) are limited. The differential outcomes from CTO revascularization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kook, Hyungdon, Yang, Jeong Hoon, Cho, Jae Young, Jang, Duck Hyun, Kim, Min Sun, Lee, Juneyoung, Lee, Seung Hun, Joo, Hyung Joon, Park, Jae Hyoung, Hong, Soon Jun, Kim, Je Sang, Lee, Hyun Jong, Choi, Rak Kyeong, Choi, Young Jin, Park, Jin Sik, Song, Young Bin, Choi, Jin-Ho, Hahn, Joo-Yong, Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol, Lim, Do-Sun, Choi, Seung-Hyuk, Yu, Cheol Woong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32880002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2
_version_ 1783647299167059968
author Kook, Hyungdon
Yang, Jeong Hoon
Cho, Jae Young
Jang, Duck Hyun
Kim, Min Sun
Lee, Juneyoung
Lee, Seung Hun
Joo, Hyung Joon
Park, Jae Hyoung
Hong, Soon Jun
Kim, Je Sang
Lee, Hyun Jong
Choi, Rak Kyeong
Choi, Young Jin
Park, Jin Sik
Song, Young Bin
Choi, Jin-Ho
Hahn, Joo-Yong
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
Lim, Do-Sun
Choi, Seung-Hyuk
Yu, Cheol Woong
author_facet Kook, Hyungdon
Yang, Jeong Hoon
Cho, Jae Young
Jang, Duck Hyun
Kim, Min Sun
Lee, Juneyoung
Lee, Seung Hun
Joo, Hyung Joon
Park, Jae Hyoung
Hong, Soon Jun
Kim, Je Sang
Lee, Hyun Jong
Choi, Rak Kyeong
Choi, Young Jin
Park, Jin Sik
Song, Young Bin
Choi, Jin-Ho
Hahn, Joo-Yong
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
Lim, Do-Sun
Choi, Seung-Hyuk
Yu, Cheol Woong
author_sort Kook, Hyungdon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization on survival remains controversial. Furthermore, data regarding outcome differences for CTO revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) are limited. The differential outcomes from CTO revascularization in patients with preserved LVSF (PLVSF) versus reduced LVSF (RLVSF) were assessed. METHODS: A total of 2,173 CTO patients were divided into either a PLVSF (n = 1661, Ejection fraction ≥ 50%) or RLVSF (n = 512, < 50%) group. Clinical outcomes were compared between successful CTO revascularization (SCR) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) within each group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for endpoint analysis and a contrast test for comparison of survival probability differences according to LVSF were used. RESULTS: Patients with RLVSF had a mean 37% ejection fraction (EF) and 19% had EF < 30%. The median follow-up duration was 1,138 days. Regardless of LVSF, the primary endpoint incidence was significantly lower in patients treated with SCR [RLVSF: 29.7% vs. 49.7%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.62, p < 0.0001; PLVSF 7.3% vs. 16.9%, HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54–0.93, p = 0.0019], which was mainly driven by a reduction in cardiac death. The difference in survival probability was greater and became more pronounced over time in patients with RLVSF than with PLVSF (1-year, p = 0.197; 3-years, p = 0.048; 5-years, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: SCR was associated with better survival benefit than OMT regardless of LVSF. The benefit was greater and became more significant over time in patients with RLVSF versus PLVSF. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7862506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78625062021-02-16 Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function Kook, Hyungdon Yang, Jeong Hoon Cho, Jae Young Jang, Duck Hyun Kim, Min Sun Lee, Juneyoung Lee, Seung Hun Joo, Hyung Joon Park, Jae Hyoung Hong, Soon Jun Kim, Je Sang Lee, Hyun Jong Choi, Rak Kyeong Choi, Young Jin Park, Jin Sik Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin-Ho Hahn, Joo-Yong Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol Lim, Do-Sun Choi, Seung-Hyuk Yu, Cheol Woong Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: The effect of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization on survival remains controversial. Furthermore, data regarding outcome differences for CTO revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) are limited. The differential outcomes from CTO revascularization in patients with preserved LVSF (PLVSF) versus reduced LVSF (RLVSF) were assessed. METHODS: A total of 2,173 CTO patients were divided into either a PLVSF (n = 1661, Ejection fraction ≥ 50%) or RLVSF (n = 512, < 50%) group. Clinical outcomes were compared between successful CTO revascularization (SCR) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) within each group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for endpoint analysis and a contrast test for comparison of survival probability differences according to LVSF were used. RESULTS: Patients with RLVSF had a mean 37% ejection fraction (EF) and 19% had EF < 30%. The median follow-up duration was 1,138 days. Regardless of LVSF, the primary endpoint incidence was significantly lower in patients treated with SCR [RLVSF: 29.7% vs. 49.7%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.62, p < 0.0001; PLVSF 7.3% vs. 16.9%, HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54–0.93, p = 0.0019], which was mainly driven by a reduction in cardiac death. The difference in survival probability was greater and became more pronounced over time in patients with RLVSF than with PLVSF (1-year, p = 0.197; 3-years, p = 0.048; 5-years, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: SCR was associated with better survival benefit than OMT regardless of LVSF. The benefit was greater and became more significant over time in patients with RLVSF versus PLVSF. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7862506/ /pubmed/32880002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kook, Hyungdon
Yang, Jeong Hoon
Cho, Jae Young
Jang, Duck Hyun
Kim, Min Sun
Lee, Juneyoung
Lee, Seung Hun
Joo, Hyung Joon
Park, Jae Hyoung
Hong, Soon Jun
Kim, Je Sang
Lee, Hyun Jong
Choi, Rak Kyeong
Choi, Young Jin
Park, Jin Sik
Song, Young Bin
Choi, Jin-Ho
Hahn, Joo-Yong
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
Lim, Do-Sun
Choi, Seung-Hyuk
Yu, Cheol Woong
Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
title Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
title_full Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
title_fullStr Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
title_full_unstemmed Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
title_short Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
title_sort differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32880002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01738-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kookhyungdon differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT yangjeonghoon differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT chojaeyoung differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT jangduckhyun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT kimminsun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT leejuneyoung differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT leeseunghun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT joohyungjoon differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT parkjaehyoung differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT hongsoonjun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT kimjesang differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT leehyunjong differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT choirakkyeong differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT choiyoungjin differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT parkjinsik differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT songyoungbin differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT choijinho differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT hahnjooyong differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT gwonhyeoncheol differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT limdosun differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT choiseunghyuk differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction
AT yucheolwoong differentialclinicalimpactofchronictotalocclusionrevascularizationbasedonleftventricularsystolicfunction