Cargando…

Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia

To evaluate the repeatability of Corvis ST corneal biomechanical, tonometry and pachymetry measurements, and agreement of pachymetry measures with the Pentacam HR and RTVue OCT. Three consecutive measurements of the right eye of 238 myopic subjects were acquired with the Corvis ST, Pentacam HR, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaorui, McAlinden, Colm, Zhang, Hongbing, Yan, Jie, Wang, Dan, Wei, Wei, Mi, Shengjian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33542296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80915-9
_version_ 1783647334058426368
author Wang, Xiaorui
McAlinden, Colm
Zhang, Hongbing
Yan, Jie
Wang, Dan
Wei, Wei
Mi, Shengjian
author_facet Wang, Xiaorui
McAlinden, Colm
Zhang, Hongbing
Yan, Jie
Wang, Dan
Wei, Wei
Mi, Shengjian
author_sort Wang, Xiaorui
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the repeatability of Corvis ST corneal biomechanical, tonometry and pachymetry measurements, and agreement of pachymetry measures with the Pentacam HR and RTVue OCT. Three consecutive measurements of the right eye of 238 myopic subjects were acquired with the Corvis ST, Pentacam HR, and RTVue OCT. Repeatability of Corvis ST was evaluated by within-subject standard deviation [S(w)] and repeatability limit [r]. The agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements were compared among the three instruments using the Bland–Altman limits of agreement. Comparisons were further stratified by CCT (Cornea(thin) ≤ 500 µm; Cornea(normal) = 500–550 µm; Cornea(thick) > 550 µm). S(w) was below 1 mmHg in Cornea(thin), Cornea(normal), and Cornea(thick) groups for IOP and bIOP. S(w) for SP-A1 were 4.880, 6.128, 7.719 mmHg/mm respectively. S(w) for CBI were 0.228, 0.157, 0.076, and correspondingly S(w) for TBI and SSI were 0.094 and 0.056, 0.079 and 0.053, 0.070 and 0.053. The Bland–Altman plots for CCT implied poor agreement with mean differences of 29.49 µm between Corvis and OCT, 9.33 µm between Pentacam and OCT, and 20.16 µm between Corvis and Pentacam. The Corvis ST showed good repeatability with the exception of CBI in the various CCT groups. The CCT measured by Corvis ST was not interchangeable with Pentacam HR and RTVue OCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7862660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78626602021-02-08 Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia Wang, Xiaorui McAlinden, Colm Zhang, Hongbing Yan, Jie Wang, Dan Wei, Wei Mi, Shengjian Sci Rep Article To evaluate the repeatability of Corvis ST corneal biomechanical, tonometry and pachymetry measurements, and agreement of pachymetry measures with the Pentacam HR and RTVue OCT. Three consecutive measurements of the right eye of 238 myopic subjects were acquired with the Corvis ST, Pentacam HR, and RTVue OCT. Repeatability of Corvis ST was evaluated by within-subject standard deviation [S(w)] and repeatability limit [r]. The agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements were compared among the three instruments using the Bland–Altman limits of agreement. Comparisons were further stratified by CCT (Cornea(thin) ≤ 500 µm; Cornea(normal) = 500–550 µm; Cornea(thick) > 550 µm). S(w) was below 1 mmHg in Cornea(thin), Cornea(normal), and Cornea(thick) groups for IOP and bIOP. S(w) for SP-A1 were 4.880, 6.128, 7.719 mmHg/mm respectively. S(w) for CBI were 0.228, 0.157, 0.076, and correspondingly S(w) for TBI and SSI were 0.094 and 0.056, 0.079 and 0.053, 0.070 and 0.053. The Bland–Altman plots for CCT implied poor agreement with mean differences of 29.49 µm between Corvis and OCT, 9.33 µm between Pentacam and OCT, and 20.16 µm between Corvis and Pentacam. The Corvis ST showed good repeatability with the exception of CBI in the various CCT groups. The CCT measured by Corvis ST was not interchangeable with Pentacam HR and RTVue OCT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7862660/ /pubmed/33542296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80915-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Xiaorui
McAlinden, Colm
Zhang, Hongbing
Yan, Jie
Wang, Dan
Wei, Wei
Mi, Shengjian
Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
title Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
title_full Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
title_fullStr Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
title_short Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
title_sort assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the corvis st in myopia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7862660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33542296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80915-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiaorui assessmentofcornealbiomechanicstonometryandpachymetrywiththecorvisstinmyopia
AT mcalindencolm assessmentofcornealbiomechanicstonometryandpachymetrywiththecorvisstinmyopia
AT zhanghongbing assessmentofcornealbiomechanicstonometryandpachymetrywiththecorvisstinmyopia
AT yanjie assessmentofcornealbiomechanicstonometryandpachymetrywiththecorvisstinmyopia
AT wangdan assessmentofcornealbiomechanicstonometryandpachymetrywiththecorvisstinmyopia
AT weiwei assessmentofcornealbiomechanicstonometryandpachymetrywiththecorvisstinmyopia
AT mishengjian assessmentofcornealbiomechanicstonometryandpachymetrywiththecorvisstinmyopia